Motivating Intelligent E-mail in Business: An Investigation into Current Trends for E-mail Processing and Communication Research

According to recent surveys, information workerssend and receive an average of 133 messages per day, andusers talk about “living” in email, spending an average of21 percent of their time on it, as well as reporting generalproblems with overload. Information created by a business can represent either an asset or a liability, depending largely on how well it is managed. Email is no different in this respect: it can be a highly efficient and useful tool for communication, but only if the information it contains can be managed effectively. One of the main drawbacks of email usage today is its insufficient integration into the collective workspace environment. We believe that by integrating it with other external information (both onthe desktop and on distributed servers), one can migrate some of this information to more appropriate storage environments, thereby partly addressing the problem of overload and offering users an integrated access to data and functionality. Currently, there is much research in the area of both personalised and business information management, but very little research that focuses on email as the primary information source, despite its ubiquity. In this paper we survey the current state of the art in email processing and communication research, focusing onthe current and potential roles played by email in information management, and commercial and research efforts to integrate a semantic-based approach to email.

[1]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  ReMail: a reinvented email prototype , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[2]  Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.  MailCat: an intelligent assistant for organizing e-mail , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[3]  William W. Cohen,et al.  Activity-centred Search in Email , 2008, CEAS.

[4]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[5]  Fernando Pereira,et al.  Generating summary keywords for emails using topics , 2008, IUI '08.

[6]  Ladislav Hluchý,et al.  Supporting Collaboration by Large Scale Email Analysis , 2008 .

[7]  Ian Smith,et al.  Taking email to task: the design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool , 2003, CHI '03.

[8]  Michael Gertz,et al.  Mining email social networks , 2006, MSR '06.

[9]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Relationship Identification for Social Network Discovery , 2007, AAAI.

[10]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Semantic email , 2004, WWW '04.

[11]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Understanding sequence and reply relationships within email conversations: a mixed-model visualization , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  Giuseppe Carenini,et al.  Summarizing Emails with Conversational Cohesion and Subjectivity , 2008, ACL.

[13]  Yiming Yang,et al.  The Enron Corpus: A New Dataset for Email Classi(cid:12)cation Research , 2004 .

[14]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the Web , 2004, CEAS.

[15]  Peter Loos,et al.  Commius - An email based interoperability solution tailored for SMEs , 2008, J. Digit. Inf. Manag..

[16]  Cécile Paris,et al.  The nature of requests and commitments in email messages , 2008, AAAI 2008.

[17]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  ContactMap: Organizing communication in a social desktop , 2004, TCHI.

[18]  Ladislav Hluchý Network Enterprise Interoperability and Collaboration using E-mail Communication , 2007 .

[19]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  TeleNotes: managing lightweight interactions in the desktop , 1997, TCHI.

[20]  William W. Cohen,et al.  On the collective classification of email "speech acts" , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[21]  A. J. Bernheim Brush,et al.  Revisiting Whittaker & Sidner's "email overload" ten years later , 2006, CSCW '06.

[22]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  E-mail research: targeting the enterprise , 2005 .

[23]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Does the Use of E-Mail Change Over Time? , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[25]  Mark Dredze,et al.  Activity-Centric Email: A Machine Learning Approach , 2006, AAAI.

[26]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Attention-Sensitive Alerting , 1999, UAI.

[27]  David G. Schwartz,et al.  Tying Knowledge to Action with kMail , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..