False Negative Cell-Free DNA Screening Result in a Newborn with Trisomy 13

Background. Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is revolutionizing prenatal screening as a result of its increased sensitivity, specificity. NIPS analyzes cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) circulating in maternal plasma to detect fetal chromosome abnormalities. However, cffDNA originates from apoptotic placental trophoblast; therefore cffDNA is not always representative of the fetus. Although the published data for NIPS testing states that the current technique ensures high sensitivity and specificity for aneuploidy detection, false positives are possible due to isolated placental mosaicism, vanishing twin or cotwin demise, and maternal chromosome abnormalities or malignancy. Results. We report a case of false negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening due to fetoplacental mosaicism. An infant male with negative cfDNA screening result was born with multiple congenital abnormalities. Postnatal chromosome and FISH studies on a blood specimen revealed trisomy 13 in 20/20 metaphases and 100% interphase nuclei, respectively. FISH analysis on tissues collected after delivery revealed extraembryonic mosaicism. Conclusions. Extraembryonic tissue mosaicism is likely responsible for the false negative cfDNA screening result. This case illustrates that a negative result does not rule out the possibility of a fetus affected with a trisomy, as cffDNA is derived from the placenta and therefore may not accurately represent the fetal genetic information.

[1]  R. Hochstenbach,et al.  Unexplained False Negative Results in Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Two Cases Involving Trisomies 13 and 18 , 2015, Case reports in genetics.

[2]  Y. Gao,et al.  Non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146 958 pregnancies , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  C. Strom,et al.  Discordant noninvasive prenatal testing and cytogenetic results: a study of 109 consecutive cases , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  F. Grati,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18, 13 and the common sex chromosome aneuploidies from maternal blood using massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Hailiang Liu,et al.  A prenatal case with discrepant findings between non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal genetic testings , 2014, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[6]  Y. Gao,et al.  False‐negative trisomy 18 non‐invasive prenatal test result due to 48,XXX,+18 placental mosaicism , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  S. Cheung,et al.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center , 2014 .

[8]  J. Visootsak,et al.  A Case of False Negative NIPT for Down Syndrome-Lessons Learned , 2014, Case reports in genetics.

[9]  P. Willems,et al.  The first 3,000 Non-Invasive Prenatal Tests (NIPT) with the Harmony test in Belgium and the Netherlands , 2014, Facts, views & vision in ObGyn.

[10]  D. Cram,et al.  Two cases of placental T21 mosaicism: challenging the detection limits of non‐invasive prenatal testing , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[11]  J. Canick,et al.  The impact of maternal plasma DNA fetal fraction on next generation sequencing tests for common fetal aneuploidies , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  E. Hardisty,et al.  Discordant noninvasive prenatal testing results in a patient subsequently diagnosed with metastatic disease , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[13]  C. Liao,et al.  Discordant results between fetal karyotyping and non‐invasive prenatal testing by maternal plasma sequencing in a case of uniparental disomy 21 due to trisomic rescue , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[14]  R. Rava,et al.  Initial clinical laboratory experience in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma DNA samples , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[15]  D. Weaver,et al.  Positive cell-free fetal DNA testing for trisomy 13 reveals confined placental mosaicism , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  H. Zhang,et al.  Fetal aneuploidy screening by maternal plasma DNA sequencing: ‘False positive’ due to confined placental mosaicism , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[17]  Hui Jiang,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing for fetal aneuploidy detects maternal trisomy X , 2012, Prenatal diagnosis.

[18]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[19]  Yama W. L. Zheng,et al.  Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  J. M. Costa,et al.  Circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal serum appears to originate from cyto- and syncytio-trophoblastic cells. Case report. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[21]  D. Kalousek,et al.  Chromosomal mosaicism confined to the placenta in human conceptions. , 1983, Science.