Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm

Currently, there is considerable controversy regarding the degree to which top-down control can affect attentional capture by salient events. According to the contingent capture hypothesis, attentional capture by a salient stimulus is contingent on a match between the properties of the stimulus and top-down attentional control settings. In contrast, bottom-up saliency accounts argue that the initial capture of attention is determined solely by the relative salience of the stimulus, and the effect of top-down attentional control is limited to effects on the duration of attentional engagement on the capturing stimulus. In the present study, we tested these competing accounts by utilizing the N2pc event-related potential component to track the locus of attention during an attentional capture task. The results were completely consistent with the contingent capture hypothesis: An N2pc wave was elicited only by distractors that possessed the target-defining attribute. In a second experiment, we expanded upon this finding by exploring the effect of target-distractor similarity on the duration that attention dwells at the distractor location. In this experiment, only distractors possessing the target-defining attribute (color) captured visuospatial attention to their location and the N2pc increased in duration and in magnitude when the capture distractor also shared a second target attribute (category membership). Finally, in three additional control experiments, we replicated the finding of an N2pc generated by distractors, only if they shared the target-defining attribute. Thus, our results demonstrate that attentional control settings influence both which stimuli attract attention and to what extent they are processed.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.

[6]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: new evidence from the N2pc component. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Attentional and anatomical considerations for the representation of simple stimuli in visual short-term memory: evidence from human electrophysiology , 2009, Psychological research.

[10]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Salience detection and attentional capture , 2009, Psychological research.

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  An electrophysiological assessment of distractor suppression in visual search tasks. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[14]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  R. Leal-Arcas,et al.  Contents: summary of , 2016 .

[17]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing? , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention , 2000 .

[21]  C Alain,et al.  Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[23]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[26]  Nicolas Robitaille,et al.  Effect of cue–target interval on the N2pc , 2006, Neuroreport.

[27]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: the influence of color in S-R corresponding conditions. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[29]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search , 2009, Brain Research.

[30]  Fernando Cadaveira,et al.  N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural Correlates of Attentional Capture in Visual Search , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus is Sensitive to Bottom–Up Attention Driven by Stimulus Salience , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  The N2pc component in ERP and the lateralization effect of language on color perception , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Mental Rotation Requires Visual Short-term Memory: Evidence from Human Electric Cortical Activity , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The time course of the contingent spatial blink. , 2005, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[42]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Troy A W Visser,et al.  Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.