Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether counts of pixels with subzero attenuation on CT scans can aid in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat. MATERIALS AND METHODS Of 33 angiomyolipomas identified among 719 renal masses resected from 702 patients over 4 years, 15 masses in 15 patients were prospectively diagnosed on the basis of the presence of fat at MDCT. The 18 patients with minimal-fat angiomyolipoma and a matched (age, sex, tumor size) cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma were included in this study. Three radiologists independently counted the number of pixels with attenuation less than -10, -20, and -30 HU. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the number of pixels at each cutoff was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value with the following criteria: 1, more than 10 pixels less than -20 HU; 2, more than 20 pixels less than -20 HU; 3, more than 5 pixels less than -30 HU. RESULTS Using criterion 1, reader A identified six angiomyolipomas; reader B, five; and reader C, two. The combined sensitivity was 24%; specificity, 98%; and positive predictive value, 69%. Using criterion 2, reader A identified three angiomyolipomas; reader B, four; and reader C, two. The combined sensitivity was 17%; specificity, 100%; and positive predictive value, 100%. Using criterion 3, reader A identified four angiomyolipomas; reader B, four; and reader C, two. The combined sensitivity was 18%; specificity, 100%; and positive predictive value, 100%. CONCLUSION CT findings of more than 20 pixels with attenuation less than -20 HU and more than 5 pixels with attenuation less than -30 HU have a positive predictive value of 100% in detection of angiomyolipoma, but most angiomyolipomas with minimal fat cannot be reliably identified on the basis of an absolute pixel count.

[1]  N. Lawrentschuk,et al.  Imaging renal cell carcinoma with ultrasonography, CT and MRI , 2010, Nature Reviews Urology.

[2]  A. Megibow,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detection. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  G. Sant,et al.  Computed tomographic findings in renal angiomyolipoma: an histologic correlation. , 1984, Urology.

[4]  S. Silverman,et al.  Hyperattenuating renal masses: etiologies, pathogenesis, and imaging evaluation. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  Y. Itai,et al.  Improved CT Fat Detection in Small Kidney Angiomyolipomas using Thin Sections and Single Voxel Measurements , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  R. Ghavamian,et al.  Imaging characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologic correlations. , 2005, Urology.

[7]  S. Herrell,et al.  Second prize: frequency of benign renal cortical tumors and histologic subtypes based on size in a contemporary series: what to tell our patients. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[8]  K. Becker,et al.  Detection of fat in a renal cell carcinoma mimicking angiomyolipoma. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  J. Epstein,et al.  Renal Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma With Atypia: A Series of 40 Cases With Emphasis on Clinicopathologic Prognostic Indicators of Malignancy , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[10]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  S. Schabel,et al.  Small renal neoplasms: diagnostic imaging, pathologic features, and clinical course. , 1986, Radiology.

[12]  Anthony E. Samir,et al.  Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? , 2008, Radiology.

[13]  M. Bosniak Angiomyolipoma (hamartoma) of the kidney: A preoperative diagnosis is possible in virtually every case , 1981, Urologic radiology.

[14]  O. Hélénon,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma containing fat: demonstration with CT. , 1993, Radiology.

[15]  S. Schabel,et al.  Intratumoral fat in a renal oncocytoma mimicking angiomyolipoma. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  F. W. Foote,et al.  Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: report of 27 cases and review of the literature. , 1969, The Journal of urology.

[17]  O. Hélénon,et al.  Unusual fat-containing tumors of the kidney: a diagnostic dilemma. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  P. Ramchandani,et al.  Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. , 2006, Urology.

[19]  U. Patel,et al.  Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or =-10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or =-10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[20]  Jeong Kon Kim,et al.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[21]  A. Megibow,et al.  CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  A. Prando Intratumoral fat in a renal cell carcinoma. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Namkug Kim,et al.  CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  T. Ohsawa,et al.  CT Pixel Mapping in the Diagnosis of Small Angiomyolipomas of the Kidneys , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.