Regulation-Structured Dynamic Metabolic Model Provides a Potential Mechanism for Delayed Enzyme Response in Denitrification Process

In a recent study of denitrification dynamics in hyporheic zone sediments, we observed a significant time lag (up to several days) in enzymatic response to the changes in substrate concentration. To explore an underlying mechanism and understand the interactive dynamics between enzymes and nutrients, we developed a trait-based model that associates a community's traits with functional enzymes, instead of typically used species guilds (or functional guilds). This enzyme-based formulation allows to collectively describe biogeochemical functions of microbial communities without directly parameterizing the dynamics of species guilds, therefore being scalable to complex communities. As a key component of modeling, we accounted for microbial regulation occurring through transcriptional and translational processes, the dynamics of which was parameterized based on the temporal profiles of enzyme concentrations measured using a new signature peptide-based method. The simulation results using the resulting model showed several days of a time lag in enzymatic responses as observed in experiments. Further, the model showed that the delayed enzymatic reactions could be primarily controlled by transcriptional responses and that the dynamics of transcripts and enzymes are closely correlated. The developed model can serve as a useful tool for predicting biogeochemical processes in natural environments, either independently or through integration with hydrologic flow simulators.

[1]  Uwe Sauer,et al.  The importance of post-translational modifications in regulating Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[2]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Unveiling steady‐state multiplicity in hybridoma cultures: The cybernetic approach , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  G. Stephanopoulos CHAPTER 1 – The Essence of Metabolic Engineering , 1998 .

[4]  C. Thompson,et al.  Nitrate bioreduction in redox-variable low permeability sediments. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Reed L. Taffs,et al.  In silico approaches to study mass and energy flows in microbial consortia: a syntrophic case study , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[6]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Dynamic modeling of aerobic growth of Shewanella oneidensis. Predicting triauxic growth, flux distributions, and energy requirement for growth. , 2013, Metabolic engineering.

[7]  F. Crick Central Dogma of Molecular Biology , 1970, Nature.

[8]  Dennis Eichmann,et al.  Metabolic Engineering Principles And Methodologies , 2016 .

[9]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Cybernetic models based on lumped elementary modes accurately predict strain‐specific metabolic function , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Dynamic models of metabolism: Review of the cybernetic approach , 2012 .

[11]  E. Roden,et al.  Microbial physiology-based model of ethanol metabolism in subsurface sediments. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[12]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Scientific method in practice , 2002 .

[13]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Exacting predictions by cybernetic model confirmed experimentally: Steady state multiplicity in the chemostat , 2012, Biotechnology progress.

[14]  Joanna M. Clark,et al.  The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems , 2014, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[15]  Chris Whidden,et al.  Interactions in the microbiome: communities of organisms and communities of genes , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[16]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Prediction of dynamic behavior of mutant strains from limited wild-type data. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.

[17]  J. P. Malone,et al.  Soil pH affects the processes reducing nitrate to nitrous oxide and di-nitrogen , 1998 .

[18]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Systematic development of hybrid cybernetic models: Application to recombinant yeast co‐consuming glucose and xylose , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  W. Riley,et al.  A total quasi-steady-state formulation of substrate uptake kinetics in complex networks and an example application to microbial litter decomposition , 2013 .

[20]  M. Strous,et al.  Microbial nitrate respiration--genes, enzymes and environmental distribution. , 2011, Journal of biotechnology.

[21]  G. T. Tsao,et al.  A cybernetic view of microbial growth: Modeling of cells as optimal strategists , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Jamey D. Young,et al.  Integrating cybernetic modeling with pathway analysis provides a dynamic, systems‐level description of metabolic control , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Didier L. Baho,et al.  Fundamentals of Microbial Community Resistance and Resilience , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[24]  Wolfram Liebermeister,et al.  The Protein Cost of Metabolic Fluxes: Prediction from Enzymatic Rate Laws and Cost Minimization , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  J. Varner,et al.  Large-scale prediction of phenotype: concept. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Cybernetic modeling of bacterial cultures at low growth rates: Mixed‐substrate systems , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  J. Fredrickson,et al.  Integrating Ecological and Engineering Concepts of Resilience in Microbial Communities , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[28]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine, 2nd ed. , 1961 .

[29]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  A hybrid model of anaerobic E. coli GJT001: Combination of elementary flux modes and cybernetic variables , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[30]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  On the Matching and Proportional Laws of Cybernetic Models , 2007, Biotechnology progress.

[31]  Jamey D. Young Learning from the Steersman: A Natural History of Cybernetic Models , 2015 .

[32]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Complex growth dynamics in batch cultures: Experiments and cybernetic models , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[33]  Katharina Nöh,et al.  Current state and challenges for dynamic metabolic modeling. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[34]  Axel Bender,et al.  Networked buffering: a basic mechanism for distributed robustness in complex adaptive systems , 2009, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[35]  G. T. Tsao,et al.  Are Microbes Optimal Strategists? , 1987 .

[36]  D. Ramkrishna A Cybernetic Perspective of Microbial Growth , 1983 .

[37]  Allan Konopka,et al.  Dynamics in microbial communities: unraveling mechanisms to identify principles , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[38]  C. Dawson,et al.  Effects of Microbial Metabolic Lag in Contaminant Transport and Biodegradation Modeling , 1995 .

[39]  A. Zimmerman,et al.  Organo-Mineral-Enzyme Interaction and Soil Enzyme Activity , 2010 .

[40]  Nicholas J. Bouskill,et al.  Trait-Based Representation of Biological Nitrification: Model Development, Testing, and Predicted Community Composition , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[41]  Reinhard Guthke,et al.  Optimal regulatory strategies for metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli depending on protein costs , 2011, Molecular Systems Biology.

[42]  G. T. Tsao,et al.  Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[43]  A. Konopka,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Microbial Community Dynamics: A Methodological Review , 2014 .

[44]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Metabolic regulation in bacterial continuous cultures: I. , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[46]  May C. Chen Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist , 1990, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[47]  W. Nelson,et al.  Targeted quantification of functional enzyme dynamics in environmental samples for microbially mediated biogeochemical processes , 2017, Environmental microbiology reports.

[48]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Prediction of metabolic function from limited data: Lumped hybrid cybernetic modeling (L‐HCM) , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[49]  W. Nelson,et al.  Groundwater–surface water mixing shifts ecological assembly processes and stimulates organic carbon turnover , 2015, Nature Communications.

[50]  A. Kienle,et al.  Experimental and theoretical analysis of poly (β-hydroxybutyrate) formation and consumption in Ralstonia eutropha , 2011 .

[51]  S D Allison,et al.  A trait-based approach for modelling microbial litter decomposition. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[52]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Modeling metabolic systems: the need for dynamics , 2013 .

[53]  F. H. Adler Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[54]  Hyun-Seob Song,et al.  Dynamic Metabolic Modeling of Denitrifying Bacterial Growth: The Cybernetic Approach , 2015 .

[55]  J. Wyller,et al.  Efficient incorporation of microbial metabolic lag in subsurface transport modeling , 2012 .

[56]  M L Alexander,et al.  Cybernetic modeling of iron‐limited growth and siderophore production , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.