How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education

The present study addresses the effectiveness of an educational mathematics game for improving proportional reasoning in students from prevocational education. Though in theory game-based learning is promising, research shows that results are ambiguous and that we should look into ways to support game-based learning. The current study explored two factors (i.e., collaboration and competition) that have been associated with motivational and cognitive effects, and have potential to optimize game-based learning. In a fully crossed design, four conditions were examined: collaboration and competition, collaboration control, competition control, and control. It was found that, over all, gameplay did improve students' proportional reasoning skills but that learning effects did not differ between conditions. However, when students' ability levels were taken into account, an interaction between collaboration and competition was found. For below-average students, the effect of collaboration was modified by competition, showing a negative effect of competition on domain knowledge gains in a collaborative learning situation. In contrast, for above-average students, the data demonstrated a trend that suggests a positive effect of competition on domain knowledge gain in a collaborative learning situation. This study explored game-based mathematics learning for prevocational education (age 11-15).Two factors were investigated: competition and collaboration.An interaction between collaboration and competition, modified by ability level was found.For below-average students competition negatively affected collaborative learning.For above average students competition positively affected collaborative learning.

[1]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Adaptive Advice in Learning With a Computer-Based Knowledge Management Simulation Game , 2012 .

[2]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls , 1995, CSCL.

[3]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Interaction between tool and talk: how instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Steven Pulos,et al.  Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature , 1985 .

[5]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive consequences of making computer-based learning activities more game-like , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Video games in education , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Games Simul..

[7]  Yavuz Samur,et al.  Differential effects of learning games on mathematics proficiency , 2015 .

[8]  Hercy N. H. Cheng,et al.  Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. , 2007 .

[10]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Can performance feedback during instruction boost knowledge acquisition? Contrasting criterion-based and social comparison feedback , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[11]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Stability of Small Group Interaction and Achievement Over Time. , 1984 .

[12]  Jean Écalle,et al.  Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  Ton de Jong,et al.  When a game supports prevocational math education but integrated reflection does not , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Competition and students’ perceptions in a game-based language learning environment , 2013 .

[15]  A. Schoenfeld Making Mathematics Work for All Children: Issues of Standards, Testing, and Equity , 2002 .

[16]  Jere Confrey,et al.  The Development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics , 1995 .

[17]  F. Paas,et al.  How to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load , 2008 .

[18]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Proportion: Learning Proportional Reasoning Together , 2012, EC-TEL.

[19]  Ton de Jong,et al.  KM QUEST: A collaborative Internet-based simulation game , 2003 .

[20]  Raija Hämäläinen,et al.  Designing and evaluating collaboration in a virtual game environment for vocational learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Bracha Kramarski Stimulating Self-Regulated Learning in Hypermedia to Support Mathematical Literacy of Lower-Achieving Students , 2012 .

[22]  Atsusi Hirumi,et al.  The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Victor Law,et al.  Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Marina Papastergiou,et al.  Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Michael K. Thomas,et al.  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns , 2005 .

[26]  Jim Bizzocchi,et al.  Game, Motivation, and Effective Learning: An Integrated Model for Educational Game Design , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[27]  LeeAnn M. Sutherland,et al.  Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Elizabeth O. Hayward,et al.  The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation , 2013 .

[29]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[30]  Diana Lambdin Kroll,et al.  An Overview of Research on Cooperative Learning Related to Mathematics. , 1991 .

[31]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Learning from games: Does collaboration help? , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[32]  F. Dochy,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? , 2013 .

[33]  Richard N. Van Eck,et al.  The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills a computer-based instructional simulation game , 2002 .

[34]  C. Lawton,et al.  Contextual Factors Affecting Errors in Proportional Reasoning. , 1993 .

[35]  Barbara L. Grabowski,et al.  Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not? , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[36]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[37]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Students' overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems: how numbers may change solutions , 2009 .

[38]  James C. Lester,et al.  Enhancing 5th graders' science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Our Princess Is in Another Castle , 2012 .

[40]  H. O'Neil,et al.  Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature , 2005 .

[41]  M. P. Jacob Habgood,et al.  Motivating Children to Learn Effectively: Exploring the Value of Intrinsic Integration in Educational Games , 2011 .

[42]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[43]  Kuan-Chieh Wang,et al.  The Comparison of Solitary and Collaborative Modes of Game-based Learning on Students' Science Learning and Motivation , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[44]  Kristina M. Whicker,et al.  Cooperative Learning in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom , 1997 .

[45]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .