Detailed quantitative assessment of colonic morphology at CT colonography using novel software: a feasibility and reproducibility study

The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of quantitative assessment of colonic morphology on CT colonography (CTC). CTC datasets from 60 patients with optimal colonic distension were assessed using prototype software. Metrics potentially associated with poor endoscopic performance were calculated for the total colon and each segment including: length, volume, tortuosity (number of high curvature points <90°), and compactness (volume of box containing centerline divided by centerline length). Sigmoid apex height relative to the lumbosacral junction was also measured. Datasets were quantified twice each, and intra-reader reliability was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman plot. Complete quantitative datasets including the five proposed metrics were generated from 58 of 60 (97 %) CTC examinations. The sigmoid and transverse segments were the longest (55.9 and 51.4 cm), had the largest volumes (0.410 and 0.609 L), and were the most tortuous (3.39 and 2.75 high curvature points) and least compact (3347 and 3595 mm2), noting high inter-patient variability for all metrics. Mean height of the sigmoid apex was 6.7 cm, also with high inter-patient variability (SD 6.8 cm). Intra-reader reliability was high for total and segmental lengths and sigmoid apex height (CCC = 0.9991) with excellent repeatability coefficient (CR = 3.0–3.3). There was low percent variance of metrics dependent upon length (median 5 %). Detailed automated quantitative assessment of colonic morphology on routine CTC datasets is feasible and reproducible, requiring minimal reader interaction.

[1]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. , 2005, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[2]  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  W. Atkin,et al.  Effect of hysterectomy status on polyp detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  C. Messina,et al.  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[5]  M. Leader,et al.  Quality of colonoscopy performance among gastroenterology and surgical trainees: a need for common training standards for all trainees? , 2011, Endoscopy.

[6]  S. Dogramadzi,et al.  Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: is the technique sufficiently sensitive to detect differences between men and women? , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[7]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: The role of waist circumference , 2008, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[8]  A. Lev-Toaff,et al.  CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  S. Sadahiro,et al.  Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex and physique , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[10]  F. Radaelli,et al.  Technical Performance of Colonoscopy: The Key Role of Sedation/Analgesia and Other Quality Indicators , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[11]  Syed G. Shah,et al.  Patient Pain During Colonoscopy: An Analysis Using Real-Time Magnetic Endoscope Imaging , 2002, Endoscopy.

[12]  T. Arcadi,et al.  Role of virtual colonoscopy following incomplete optical colonoscopy: our experience. , 2011, Il Giornale di chirurgia.

[13]  Torbjörn Falkmer,et al.  The Case for Using the Repeatability Coefficient When Calculating Test–Retest Reliability , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Colorectal anatomy in adults at computed tomography colonography: normal distribution and the effect of age, sex, and body mass index. , 2009, Endoscopy.

[15]  S Halligan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  J. Church,et al.  Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? , 1994, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[17]  S. Sadahiro,et al.  Relationship between length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine and the incidence of colorectal cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[18]  David H. Kim,et al.  Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Dirk Hartmann,et al.  Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy. , 2010, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[20]  Yuuichi Takahashi,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Factors Predicting Difficulty and Pain During Sedation-Free Colonoscopy , 2005, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[21]  C. Williams,et al.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? , 2004, Gut.

[22]  S. Halligan,et al.  Can barium enema indicate when colonoscopy will be difficult? , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[23]  J. Waye Completing colonoscopy , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[24]  W. Cohn,et al.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[25]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[26]  S Halligan,et al.  Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.