Diffusion of E-government innovations in the Dutch public sector: The case of digital community policing

This article examines the diffusion of an e-government innovation - called SMS-alert - among Dutch police forces. A conceptual framework for the diffusion of e-government innovations in the public sector is developed which combines a functional and a constructivist (or cultural) approach of diffusion. The framework focuses on diffusion as a mutual process of communication, learning and sense making. Based on this framework and by using data from documentation, websites and interviews, the process of diffusion and adoption of SMS-alert is reconstructed and the factors and mechanisms explaining this process are identified. The case study demonstrates that although SMS-alert has diffused rather rapidly until now, the diffusion process is currently facing some difficulties, mainly due to the existence of competing innovations. By demonstrating the importance of both the functional, political and institutional meaning of the innovation, the article confirms the value of combining different approaches in studying the diffusion of e-government innovations.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[3]  Lyndsay Rashman,et al.  Leading and learning? Knowledge transfer in the Beacon Council Scheme , 2002 .

[4]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  CLARIFYING CONVERGENCE. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform , 2001 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[6]  James G. March,et al.  A primer on decision making : how decisions happen , 1994 .

[7]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[8]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Transfer of Technologies: A Cross-Disciplinary Taxonomy , 2005 .

[9]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[10]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[13]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[14]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[15]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[16]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[17]  T. Rickards Sense making in organizations , 1997 .

[18]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  James Daniel Downe,et al.  Evaluating the extent of inter-organizational learning and change in local authorities through the english beacon council scheme , 2004 .

[20]  A. L. Bertrand,et al.  The Theory of Organizations. , 1972 .

[21]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[22]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .