A homologous mapping method for three-dimensional reconstruction of protein networks reveals disease-associated mutations

BackgroundOne of the crucial steps toward understanding the associations among molecular interactions, pathways, and diseases in a cell is to investigate detailed atomic protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in the structural interactome. Despite the availability of large-scale methods for analyzing PPI networks, these methods often focused on PPI networks using genome-scale data and/or known experimental PPIs. However, these methods are unable to provide structurally resolved interaction residues and their conservations in PPI networks.ResultsHere, we reconstructed a human three-dimensional (3D) structural PPI network (hDiSNet) with the detailed atomic binding models and disease-associated mutations by enhancing our PPI families and 3D–domain interologs from 60,618 structural complexes and complete genome database with 6,352,363 protein sequences across 2274 species. hDiSNet is a scale-free network (γ = 2.05), which consists of 5177 proteins and 19,239 PPIs with 5843 mutations. These 19,239 structurally resolved PPIs not only expanded the number of PPIs compared to present structural PPI network, but also achieved higher agreement with gene ontology similarities and higher co-expression correlation than the ones of 181,868 experimental PPIs recorded in public databases. Among 5843 mutations, 1653 and 790 mutations involved in interacting domains and contacting residues, respectively, are highly related to diseases. Our hDiSNet can provide detailed atomic interactions of human disease and their associated proteins with mutations. Our results show that the disease-related mutations are often located at the contacting residues forming the hydrogen bonds or conserved in the PPI family. In addition, hDiSNet provides the insights of the FGFR (EGFR)-MAPK pathway for interpreting the mechanisms of breast cancer and ErbB signaling pathway in brain cancer.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that hDiSNet can explore structural-based interactions insights for understanding the mechanisms of disease-associated proteins and their mutations. We believe that our method is useful to reconstruct structurally resolved PPI networks for interpreting structural genomics and disease associations.

[1]  Armin Ruf,et al.  Molecular switch in the glucocorticoid receptor: active and passive antagonist conformations. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  N. Anderson,et al.  A List of Candidate Cancer Biomarkers for Targeted Proteomics , 2006, Biomarker insights.

[3]  M. Ghosh,et al.  Current Understanding on EGFR and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Glioma and Their Possible Crosstalk. , 2013, Genes & cancer.

[4]  D. Haussler,et al.  The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma , 2013, Cell.

[5]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The Integr8 project - a resource for genomic and proteomic data , 2004, Silico Biol..

[6]  Nathan E Hall,et al.  CR1/CR2 Interactions Modulate the Functions of the Cell Surface Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Gerhard Christofori,et al.  Molecular networks that regulate cancer metastasis. , 2012, Seminars in cancer biology.

[8]  F. Rousseau,et al.  Short polyglutamine tracts in the androgen receptor are protective against breast cancer in the general population. , 2001, Cancer research.

[9]  L. Chin,et al.  Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment. , 2007, Genes & development.

[10]  K. Scheidtmann,et al.  ZIP kinase plays a crucial role in androgen receptor-mediated transcription , 2008, Oncogene.

[11]  P. Pollock,et al.  Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes , 2007, Oncogene.

[12]  Rafael C. Jimenez,et al.  The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012 , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Mark Trifiro,et al.  The androgen receptor gene mutations database: 2012 update , 2012, Human mutation.

[14]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation in Glioblastoma through Novel Missense Mutations in the Extracellular Domain , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[15]  Sandhya Rani,et al.  Human Protein Reference Database—2009 update , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Kuo,et al.  Activation of multiple ERBB family receptors mediates glioblastoma cancer stem-like cell resistance to EGFR-targeted inhibition. , 2012, Neoplasia.

[19]  P. Aloy,et al.  Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks , 2013, Nature Methods.

[20]  Xiaomei Wu,et al.  Prediction of yeast protein–protein interaction network: insights from the Gene Ontology and annotations , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Hiroyuki Ogata,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[23]  Jinn-Moon Yang,et al.  3D-interologs: an evolution database of physical protein- protein interactions across multiple genomes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[24]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Livia Perfetto,et al.  MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  N. Mongan,et al.  Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor: functional characterization. , 2002, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[28]  Jae-Hoon Kim,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Complex of Human Epidermal Growth Factor and Receptor Extracellular Domains , 2002, Cell.

[29]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[30]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  K. Rouschop,et al.  EGFR signaling and autophagy dependence for growth, survival, and therapy resistance , 2014, Cell cycle.

[32]  P. Czernichow,et al.  A novel substitution (Leu707Arg) in exon 4 of the androgen receptor gene causes complete androgen resistance. , 1996, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[33]  Elizabeth M. Smigielski,et al.  dbSNP: a database of single nucleotide polymorphisms , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  E. Domany,et al.  Stem cell-related "self-renewal" signature and high epidermal growth factor receptor expression associated with resistance to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  J. Wesche,et al.  Roles of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors in Carcinogenesis , 2010, Molecular Cancer Research.

[36]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Juan Fernández-Recio,et al.  SKEMPI: a Structural Kinetic and Energetic database of Mutant Protein Interactions and its use in empirical models , 2012, Bioinform..

[38]  Haiyuan Yu,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of protein networks provides insight into human genetic disease , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes , 2012, Nature.

[40]  Kurt S. Thorn,et al.  ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions , 2001, Bioinform..

[41]  M. Lombès,et al.  A new human MR splice variant is a ligand-independent transactivator modulating corticosteroid action. , 2001, Molecular endocrinology.

[42]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  Current and emerging biomarkers in breast cancer: prognosis and prediction. , 2010, Endocrine-related cancer.

[43]  N. Tebbutt,et al.  Targeting the ERBB family in cancer: couples therapy , 2013, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[44]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[45]  Alan F. Scott,et al.  McKusick's Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®) , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[46]  Brian H. Dunford-Shore,et al.  Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma , 2008, Nature.

[47]  T. Hubbard,et al.  A census of human cancer genes , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[48]  O. Rath,et al.  MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[49]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[50]  Ana M Soto,et al.  The somatic mutation theory of cancer: growing problems with the paradigm? , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[51]  D. Epstein,et al.  Old dog, new tricks: extracellular domain arginine methylation regulates EGFR function. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[52]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[53]  D. Busam,et al.  An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2008, Science.

[54]  W. Gerald,et al.  Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain , 2009, Nature.

[55]  M. Borrello,et al.  RET tyrosine kinase signaling in development and cancer. , 2005, Cytokine & growth factor reviews.

[56]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[57]  Jinn-Moon Yang,et al.  3D-partner: a web server to infer interacting partners and binding models , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[58]  M. Vidal,et al.  Edgetic perturbation models of human inherited disorders , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[59]  J. G. Park,et al.  Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 genes associated with human gastric and colorectal cancers. , 2001, Cancer research.

[60]  Forest M White,et al.  Oncogenic EGFR Signaling Networks in Glioma , 2009, Science Signaling.

[61]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[62]  Kai Xu,et al.  Visualization and analysis of the complexome network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[63]  Joseph Schlessinger,et al.  Crystal Structures of Two FGF-FGFR Complexes Reveal the Determinants of Ligand-Receptor Specificity , 2000, Cell.

[64]  Bin Zhang,et al.  PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  A. Munnich,et al.  FGFR2 mutations in Pfeiffer syndrome , 1995, Nature Genetics.