Policy-Based Grooming in Optical Networks

This work presents a discussion about policies and architecture to aggregate Internet Protocol/Multiprotocol Label Switching (IP/MPLS) traffics within lightpaths. The scenario is that of IP/MPLS client networks over an optical network. It is well known that aggregating lower traffic flows (e.g., packet-based LSPs—Label Switched Path) within higher traffic flows (e.g., lambda-based LSPs) is considered an effective way to maximize the use of the optical network resources. In this work, the policies are divided into two groups. The first one, which solely considers the class of the flow (High Priority—HP or Low Priority—LP), consists of simple policies meant to aggregate packet-based LSPs within lightpaths. In this group, the policies we have defined intend to reduce the optical network overhead to remove and reroute LP LSPs. The second group presents more sophisticated policies taking into account the possibility of having to deal with further transport faults. In this case, the grooming is better planned and the defined policies tend to reduce the negative impact when a failure is detected in the optical transport network. Our approach has been implemented to validate the policies and the results for each group are showed and discussed.

[1]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  A review of fault management in WDM mesh networks: basic concepts and research challenges , 2004, IEEE Netw..

[2]  Paola Iovanna,et al.  A traffic engineering system for multilayer networks based on the GMPLS paradigm , 2003, IEEE Netw..

[3]  Arthi Ayyangar Inter domain MPLS Traffic Engineering - RSVP-TE extensions , 2005 .

[4]  Edmundo Roberto Mauro Madeira,et al.  Policy-Based Fault Management for Integrating IP over Optical Networks , 2005, IPOM.

[5]  Guy Pujolle,et al.  Service level agreement and provisioning in optical networks , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Dimitri Papadimitriou,et al.  Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) , 2006, RFC.

[7]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Traffic grooming for survivable WDM networks: dedicated protection [Invited] , 2004 .

[8]  Gianpaolo Oriolo,et al.  A multilayer solution for path provisioning in new-generation optical/MPLS networks , 2003 .

[9]  Lou Berger,et al.  Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions , 2003, RFC.

[10]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  Traffic grooming in WDM networks: past and future , 2002, IEEE Netw..

[11]  Edmundo Roberto Mauro Madeira,et al.  Policy-based admission control in GMPLS optical networks , 2004, First International Conference on Broadband Networks.

[12]  F. Verdi,et al.  Web Services-based Provisioning of Connections in GMPLS Optical Networks , 2022 .

[13]  Eric Mannie,et al.  Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture , 2004, RFC.

[14]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  Dynamic Traffic Grooming using Fixed-Alternate Routing in WDM Mesh Optical Networks , 2004 .

[15]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Survivable WDM mesh networks , 2003 .

[16]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Traffic engineering in multigranularity heterogeneous optical WDM mesh networks through dynamic traffic grooming , 2003, IEEE Netw..