Meeting the radiative forcing targets of the representative concentration pathways in a world with agricultural climate impacts

This study assesses how climate impacts on agriculture may change the evolution of the agricultural and energy systems in meeting the end‐of‐century radiative forcing targets of the representative concentration pathways (RCPs). We build on the recently completed Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI‐MIP) exercise that has produced global gridded estimates of future crop yields for major agricultural crops using climate model projections of the RCPs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). For this study we use the bias‐corrected outputs of the HadGEM2‐ES climate model as inputs to the LPJmL crop growth model, and the outputs of LPJmL to modify inputs to the GCAM integrated assessment model. Our results indicate that agricultural climate impacts generally lead to an increase in global cropland, as compared with corresponding emissions scenarios that do not consider climate impacts on agricultural productivity. This is driven mostly by negative impacts on wheat, rice, other grains, and oil crops. Still, including agricultural climate impacts does not significantly increase the costs or change the technological strategies of global, whole‐system emissions mitigation. In fact, to meet the most aggressive climate change mitigation target (2.6 W/m2 in 2100), the net mitigation costs are slightly lower when agricultural climate impacts are considered. Key contributing factors to these results are (a) low levels of climate change in the low‐forcing scenarios, (b) adaptation to climate impacts simulated in GCAM through inter‐regional shifting in the production of agricultural goods, and (c) positive average climate impacts on bioenergy crop yields.

[1]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Global Energy: Assessing the Future , 1985 .

[2]  R. Houghton The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990* , 1999 .

[3]  Climate Change Impacts for the Conterminous USA: An Integrated Assessment , 2005 .

[4]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry , 2007 .

[5]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas W. Hertel,et al.  Global Agricultural Land Use Data for Climate Change Analysis , 2008, GTAP Working Paper.

[7]  David M. Lapola,et al.  Modeling the land requirements and potential productivity of sugarcane and jatropha in Brazil and India using the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model , 2009 .

[8]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy , 2009, Science.

[9]  How to Feed the World in 2050 , 2009 .

[10]  A. Rogers,et al.  Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[11]  C. Müller,et al.  Climate‐driven simulation of global crop sowing dates , 2012 .

[12]  P. Döll,et al.  MIRCA2000—Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high‐resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling , 2010 .

[13]  C. Müller,et al.  Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: Present and potential future patterns , 2010 .

[14]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[15]  M. Kainuma,et al.  An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 Wm−2 radiative forcing , 2011 .

[16]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[17]  Kees Klein Goldewijk,et al.  The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human‐induced global land‐use change over the past 12,000 years , 2011 .

[18]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations , 2011 .

[19]  E. Stehfest,et al.  RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C , 2011 .

[20]  J. Edmonds,et al.  RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100 , 2011 .

[21]  Håkan Pleijel,et al.  Yield vs. Quality trade‐offs for wheat in response to carbon dioxide and ozone , 2011 .

[22]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[23]  K. Calvin,et al.  GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land Use: Data Sources and Methods , 2011 .

[24]  T. Beringer,et al.  Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints , 2011 .

[25]  K. Calvin,et al.  GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land Use: Technical Description of Modeling Approach , 2011 .

[26]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[27]  Page Kyle,et al.  Implications of simultaneously mitigating and adapting to climate change: initial experiments using GCAM , 2013, Climatic Change.

[28]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget , 2013 .

[29]  F. Piontek,et al.  A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach , 2013 .

[30]  James W. Jones,et al.  Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  C. Müller,et al.  Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling , 2014 .