Quantum machine learning in high energy physics
暂无分享,去创建一个
Arthur Pesah | Gabriel Perdue | Jean-Roch Vlimant | Maria Schuld | Sofia Vallecorsa | Wen Guan | Koji Terashi | K. Terashi | S. Vallecorsa | M. Schuld | J. Vlimant | W. Guan | G. Perdue | Arthur Pesah
[1] R. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers , 1999 .
[2] C. D. Gelatt,et al. Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.
[3] D. Deutsch. Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[4] Bernhard E. Boser,et al. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.
[5] M. Powell. A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation , 1994 .
[6] Lov K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.
[7] Seth Lloyd,et al. Universal Quantum Simulators , 1996, Science.
[8] James C. Spall,et al. A one-measurement form of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation , 1997, Autom..
[9] H. Nishimori,et al. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model , 1998, cond-mat/9804280.
[10] J. Spall. Adaptive stochastic approximation by the simultaneous perturbation method , 1998, Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171).
[11] Peter W. Shor,et al. Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..
[12] M. Sipser,et al. Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution , 2000, quant-ph/0001106.
[13] James C. Spall,et al. Adaptive stochastic approximation by the simultaneous perturbation method , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..
[14] N. Cerf,et al. Quantum search by local adiabatic evolution , 2001, quant-ph/0107015.
[15] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence , 2002, Neural Computation.
[16] 今井 浩. 20世紀の名著名論:Peter Shor : Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 2004 .
[17] Matthias Troyer,et al. Feedback-optimized parallel tempering Monte Carlo , 2006, cond-mat/0602085.
[18] Vasil S. Denchev,et al. Training a Binary Classifier with the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm , 2008, 0811.0416.
[19] Hartmut Neven,et al. NIPS 2009 Demonstration: Binary Classification using Hardware Implementation of Quantum Annealing , 2009 .
[20] A. Harrow,et al. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. , 2008, Physical review letters.
[21] A. Trzupek,et al. Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , 2012 .
[22] Ryszard S. Romaniuk,et al. Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , 2012 .
[23] Daniel A. Lidar,et al. Quantum adiabatic machine learning , 2011, Quantum Inf. Process..
[24] F. Nori,et al. Quantum Simulation , 2013, Quantum Atom Optics.
[25] Gerardo Adesso,et al. Quantum learning of coherent states , 2014, 1410.8700.
[26] Masoud Mohseni,et al. Quantum support vector machine for big feature and big data classification , 2013, Physical review letters.
[27] Peter Wittek,et al. Quantum Machine Learning: What Quantum Computing Means to Data Mining , 2014 .
[28] E. Farhi,et al. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2014, 1411.4028.
[29] S. Lloyd,et al. Quantum principal component analysis , 2013, Nature Physics.
[30] Ryan Babbush,et al. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms , 2015, 1509.04279.
[31] Steven H. Adachi,et al. Application of Quantum Annealing to Training of Deep Neural Networks , 2015, ArXiv.
[32] S. Aaronson. Read the fine print , 2015, Nature Physics.
[33] L. Rossi,et al. Chapter 1: High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC , 2016, 1705.08830.
[34] T. Monz,et al. Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer , 2016, Nature.
[35] M. Benedetti,et al. Estimation of effective temperatures in quantum annealers for sampling applications: A case study with possible applications in deep learning , 2015, 1510.07611.
[36] Roger Melko,et al. Quantum Boltzmann Machine , 2016, 1601.02036.
[37] Rupak Biswas,et al. Quantum-Assisted Learning of Hardware-Embedded Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2016, 1609.02542.
[38] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms , 2015, 1509.04279.
[39] A. Rezakhani,et al. Binary classification of quantum states: Supervised and unsupervised learning , 2017, 1704.01965.
[40] Steven P. Reinhardt,et al. Partitioning Optimization Problems for Hybrid Classical/Quantum Execution TECHNICAL REPORT , 2017 .
[41] Kristan Temme,et al. Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits. , 2016, Physical review letters.
[42] Prabhat,et al. The HEP.TrkX Project: deep neural networks for HL-LHC online and offline tracking , 2017 .
[43] Ronald de Wolf,et al. Guest Column: A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory , 2017, SIGA.
[44] Maria Schuld,et al. Implementing a distance-based classifier with a quantum interference circuit , 2017, 1703.10793.
[45] Daniel A. Lidar,et al. Solving a Higgs optimization problem with quantum annealing for machine learning , 2017, Nature.
[46] Iordanis Kerenidis,et al. Quantum Recommendation Systems , 2016, ITCS.
[47] Krysta Marie Svore,et al. Quantum Speed-Ups for Solving Semidefinite Programs , 2017, 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
[48] Andreas Salzburger,et al. ACTS: from ATLAS software towards a common track reconstruction software , 2017 .
[49] Nathan Killoran,et al. Quantum generative adversarial networks , 2018, Physical Review A.
[50] D. Whiteson,et al. Deep Learning and Its Application to LHC Physics , 2018, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science.
[51] Nathan Killoran,et al. PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations , 2018, ArXiv.
[52] R. Pooser,et al. Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus. , 2018, Physical Review Letters.
[53] P. Rebentrost,et al. Quantum machine learning for quantum anomaly detection , 2017, 1710.07405.
[54] Keisuke Fujii,et al. Quantum circuit learning , 2018, Physical Review A.
[55] Hartmut Neven,et al. Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors , 2018, 1802.06002.
[56] Rupak Biswas,et al. Opportunities and challenges for quantum-assisted machine learning in near-term quantum computers , 2017, Quantum Science and Technology.
[57] Prabhat,et al. Novel deep learning methods for track reconstruction , 2018, 1810.06111.
[58] Ewin Tang,et al. A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..
[59] Simone Severini,et al. Hierarchical quantum classifiers , 2018, npj Quantum Information.
[60] Patrick J. Coles,et al. Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap , 2018, New Journal of Physics.
[61] Maria Schuld,et al. Supervised Learning with Quantum Computers , 2018 .
[62] Lei Wang,et al. Differentiable Learning of Quantum Circuit Born Machine , 2018, Physical Review A.
[63] Kazuhiro Terao,et al. Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics , 2018, Nature.
[64] L-M Duan,et al. A quantum machine learning algorithm based on generative models , 2018, Science Advances.
[65] Eli Upfal,et al. Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Paper , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[66] J. Cirac,et al. Neural-Network Quantum States, String-Bond States, and Chiral Topological States , 2017, 1710.04045.
[67] Simone Severini,et al. Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[68] Seth Lloyd,et al. Quantum Generative Adversarial Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[69] John Preskill,et al. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.
[70] Kristan Temme,et al. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces , 2018, Nature.
[71] Cécile Germain,et al. The Tracking Machine Learning Challenge: Accuracy Phase , 2019, The NeurIPS '18 Competition.
[72] Paolo Calafiura,et al. Quantum Associative Memory in Hep Track Pattern Recognition , 2019, EPJ Web of Conferences.
[73] R. Sipio,et al. Unfolding measurement distributions via quantum annealing , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[74] Joshua Job,et al. Restricted Boltzmann Machines for galaxy morphology classification with a quantum annealer , 2019, ArXiv.
[75] A. Roggero,et al. Dynamic linear response quantum algorithm , 2018, Physical Review C.
[76] John Preskill,et al. Simulating quantum field theory with a quantum computer , 2018, Proceedings of The 36th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2018).
[77] Miron Livny,et al. Application of Quantum Machine Learning to High Energy Physics Analysis at LHC using IBM Quantum Computer Simulators and IBM Quantum Computer Hardware , 2019, Proceedings of 40th International Conference on High Energy physics — PoS(ICHEP2020).
[78] K. Bibber,et al. Putting the squeeze on axions , 2019, Physics Today.
[79] Sioni Summers,et al. Kalman Filter track reconstruction on FPGAs for acceleration of the High Level Trigger of the CMS experiment at the HL-LHC , 2019, EPJ Web of Conferences.
[80] Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz,et al. A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits , 2018, npj Quantum Information.
[81] Alex Monras,et al. Unsupervised Classification of Quantum Data , 2019, Physical Review X.
[82] Daniel A. Lidar,et al. Quantum adiabatic machine learning with zooming , 2019, ArXiv.
[83] Arthur Pesah. Learning quantum state properties with quantum and classical neural networks , 2019 .
[84] Chad Rigetti,et al. Automated quantum programming via reinforcement learning for combinatorial optimization , 2019, ArXiv.
[85] Heather Gray,et al. A Pattern Recognition Algorithm for Quantum Annealers , 2019, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[86] Andrew M. Weiner,et al. Simulations of subatomic many-body physics on a quantum frequency processor , 2018, Physical Review A.
[87] C. Gogolin,et al. Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware , 2018, Physical Review A.
[88] Soonwon Choi,et al. Quantum convolutional neural networks , 2018, Nature Physics.
[89] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing. , 2018, Chemical reviews.
[90] Tobias J. Osborne,et al. No Free Lunch for Quantum Machine Learning , 2020, 2003.14103.
[91] Seth Lloyd,et al. Quantum-inspired algorithms in practice , 2019, Quantum.
[92] Andrea Rocchetto,et al. Fast quantum learning with statistical guarantees , 2020, ArXiv.
[93] J. Tanaka,et al. Event Classification with Quantum Machine Learning in High-Energy Physics , 2020, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[94] Shouvanik Chakrabarti,et al. Quantum algorithms and lower bounds for convex optimization , 2018, Quantum.
[95] Quantum embeddings for machine learning , 2020, 2001.03622.
[96] B. Demirkoz,et al. Particle Track Reconstruction with Quantum Algorithms , 2020, EPJ Web of Conferences.
[97] Ievgeniia Oshurko. Quantum Machine Learning , 2020, Quantum Computing.
[98] M. Schuld,et al. Circuit-centric quantum classifiers , 2018, Physical Review A.
[99] C. Scheuerlein,et al. Metallographic analysis of 11 T dipole coils for High Luminosity-Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) , 2020 .
[100] David Von Dollen,et al. TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learning , 2020, ArXiv.
[101] Quantum computing for neutrino-nucleus scattering , 2019, Physical Review D.
[102] Andrew W. Cross,et al. Challenges and Opportunities of Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[103] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Quantum computational chemistry , 2018, Reviews of Modern Physics.
[104] Patrick J. Coles,et al. Variational Quantum Fidelity Estimation , 2019, Quantum.
[105] Jesse R. Stryker,et al. SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers , 2019, Physical Review D.
[106] David Gosset,et al. Classical algorithms for quantum mean values , 2019, Nature Physics.
[107] John Napp,et al. Low-Depth Gradient Measurements Can Improve Convergence in Variational Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms. , 2019, Physical review letters.
[108] B. Nachman,et al. Quantum Algorithm for High Energy Physics Simulations. , 2019, Physical review letters.
[109] Daniel A. Lidar,et al. Charged particle tracking with quantum annealing optimization , 2019, Quantum Machine Intelligence.