Bi-centenary of successes of Fourier theorem: its power and limitations in optical system designs

We celebrate the two hundred years of successful use of the Fourier theorem in optics. However, there is a great enigma associated with the Fourier transform integral. It is one of the most pervasively productive and useful tool of physics and optics because its foundation is based on the superposition of harmonic functions and yet we have never declared it as a principle of physics for valid reasons. And, yet there are a good number of situations where we pretend it to be equivalent to the superposition principle of physics, creating epistemological problems of enormous magnitude. The purpose of the paper is to elucidate the problems while underscoring the successes and the elegance of the Fourier theorem, which are not explicitly discussed in the literature. We will make our point by taking six major engineering fields of optics and show in each case why it works and under what restricted conditions by bringing in the relevant physics principles. The fields are (i) optical signal processing, (ii) Fourier transform spectrometry, (iii) classical spectrometry of pulsed light, (iv) coherence theory, (v) laser mode locking and (vi) pulse broadening. We underscore that mathematical Fourier frequencies, not being physical frequencies, cannot generate real physical effects on our detectors. Appreciation of this fundamental issue will open up ways to be innovative in many new optical instrument designs. We underscore the importance of always validating our design platforms based on valid physics principles (actual processes undergoing in nature) captured by an appropriate hypothesis based on diverse observations. This paper is a comprehensive view of the power and limitations of Fourier Transform by summarizing a series of SPIE conference papers presented during 2003-2007.

[1]  Emil Wolf,et al.  Principles of Optics: Contents , 1999 .

[2]  Narasimha S. Prasad,et al.  Can the hypothesis 'photon interferes only with itself' be reconciled with superposition of light from multiple beams or sources? , 2007 .

[3]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Passive Pulse Shaping Using Delayed Superposition , 1977 .

[4]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  A critical look at the source characteristics used for time varying fringe interferometry , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  Yongyuan Jiang,et al.  Limits of DWDM with gratings and Fabry-Perots and alternate solutions , 2003, SPIE ITCom.

[6]  Colin Kelley,et al.  If EM fields do not operate on each other, why do we need many modes and large gain bandwidth to generate short pulses? , 2007, SPIE OPTO.

[7]  R. R. Rice,et al.  TWO CAVITY MODE‐LOCKING OF A He–Ne LASER , 1969 .

[8]  W. Steen,et al.  Principles of Optics M. Born and E. Wolf, 7th (expanded) edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, 952pp. £37.50/US $59.95, ISBN 0-521-64222-1 , 2000 .

[9]  A. Leggett A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down , 2005 .

[10]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri The nature of light: what are photons? , 2006 .

[11]  Peter Poulos,et al.  Can we get any better information about the nature of light by comparing radio and light wave detection processes? , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[12]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[13]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri Reality of superposition principle and autocorrelation function for short pulses , 2006, SPIE LASE.

[14]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Shall We Climb on the Shoulders of the Giants to Extend the Reality Horizon of Physics , 2007 .

[15]  Peter Poulos,et al.  If EM fields do not operate on each other, how do we generate and manipulate laser pulses? , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[16]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  If superposed light beams do not re-distribute each others energy in the absence of detectors (material dipoles), can an indivisible single photon interfere by/with itself? , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[17]  C. Roychoudhuri,et al.  Various ambiguities in re-constructing laser pulse parameters , 2006, LEOS 2006 - 19th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society.

[18]  C. Roychoudhuri The Locality of the Superposition Principle Is Dictated by Detection Processes , 2006 .

[19]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Do we count indivisible photons or discrete quantum events experienced by detectors? , 2006, SPIE Optics East.

[20]  Herbert G. Winful The meaning of group delay in barrier tunneling: A reexamination of superluminal group velocities , 2006 .

[21]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Response of Fabry–Perot interferometers to light pulses of very short duration , 1975 .

[22]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Multiple‐Beam Interferometers , 2006 .

[23]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Measuring properties of superposed light beams carrying different frequencies. , 2003, Optics express.

[24]  Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Role of the retinal detector array in perceiving the superposition effects of light , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[25]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,et al.  Are dark fringe locations devoid of energy of superposed fields? , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[26]  Katherine Creath,et al.  The nature of light: what is a photon? , 2003 .

[27]  Robert R. Alfano,et al.  Picosecond characteristics of a spectrograph measured by a streak camera/video readout system , 1980 .

[28]  Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri Can a deeper understanding of the measured behavior of light remove wave-particle duality? , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.