Diatoms image database of India (DIDI): A research tool

Abstract Biogeographical and environmental heterogeneity govern the high algal diversity of India. As of yet, no serious efforts have been made to explore Indian algae for ecological and industrial uses. The scattered nature and discrepancy in taxonomical information, as well as morphological variations in algae are hampering such studies. For example, these morphological variants may lead to ambiguous algae identification that may result in erroneous ecotoxicological assessment and also hinders the bioprospecting aspect of algae for industrial applications. To improve the situation, the Diatoms image database of India (DIDI) ( http://indianalgae.co.in ) is being developed to document the diatom diversity of India. In addition to identification aids and diatom images, the web site also includes data for environmental variables. Our database is the first web-based photographic documentation of diatoms from the sub-tropical region. DIDI is originally based on seven years of rigorous collection, examination and identification of the algal flora from different parts of India. All the diatom images given in the database are validated using Indian monographs, published papers and online image databases.

[1]  E. A. Bergey,et al.  Exploring the status of motility, lipid bodies, deformities and size reduction in periphytic diatom community from chronically metal (Cu, Zn) polluted waterbodies as a biomonitoring tool. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  M. Lürling.  Phenotypic plasticity in the green algae Desmodesmus and Scenedesmus with special reference to the induction of defensive morphology , 2003 .

[3]  L. Ector,et al.  A large-scale stream benthic diatom database , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[4]  Regine Jahn,et al.  Does the Cosmopolitan Diatom Gomphonema parvulum (Kützing) Kützing Have a Biogeography? , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  J. Lakshminarayana.  Studies on the phytoplankton of the River Ganges, Varanasi, India, Part II “The seasonal growth and succession of the plankton algae in the River Ganges” , 1965, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  D. W. Dhar,et al.  Bioprospecting and indexing the microalgal diversity of different ecological habitats of India , 2011, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[7]  Martina Doblin,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity of Southern Ocean Diatoms: Key to Success in the Sea Ice Habitat? , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  J. Gaur,et al.  Response of a phytoplanktonic assemblage to copper and zinc enrichment in microcosm , 2015, Ecotoxicology.

[9]  Koen Sabbe,et al.  Morphological, genetic and mating diversity within the widespread bioindicator Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae) , 2009 .

[10]  B. Şen,et al.  A computerized image database for freshwater algae recorded in Turkey , 2015 .

[11]  R. Olson,et al.  Diatoms favor their younger daughters , 2012 .

[12]  M. Idei.  Three new species of freshwater Diploneis from Japan , 2013 .

[13]  J. Lakshminarayana.  Studies on phytoplankton of the River Ganges, Varanasi, India Part I “The physico-chemical characteristics of River Ganges” , 1965, Hydrobiologia.

[14]  David G. Mann,et al.  Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms , 1996 .

[15]  J. Komárková,et al.  Experimental comparison of phenotypical plasticity and growth demands of two strains from the Anabaena circinalis/A. crassa complex (cyanobacteria) , 2008 .

[16]  Michael D. Guiry,et al.  AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication , 2013 .

[17]  M. Strüder-Kypke,et al.  Development of web-based guides to planktonic protists , 2002 .

[18]  E. F. D. da Silva,et al.  Environmental impact of mining activities in the Lousal area (Portugal): chemical and diatom characterization of metal-contaminated stream sediments and surface water of Corona stream. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  BIOVOLUME CALCULATION FOR PELAGIC AND BENTHIC MICROALGAE , 1999 .

[20]  M. Lürling,et al.  Growth and temperature‐related phenotypic plasticity in the cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii , 2013 .

[21]  R. Patrick,et al.  The diatoms of the United States. , 1966 .

[22]  David G. Mann,et al.  Morphology and identity of some ecologically important small Nitzschia species , 2013 .

[23]  R. Prasanna,et al.  Bioprospecting microalgae as potential sources of “Green Energy”—challenges and perspectives (Review) , 2012, Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology.

[24]  Sybille Wunsam,et al.  Diatom taxonomic and morphological changes as indicators of metal pollution and recovery in Lac Dufault (Québec, Canada) , 2004 .

[25]  M. Guiry,et al.  HOW MANY SPECIES OF ALGAE ARE THERE? , 2012, Journal of phycology.

[26]  K. Manoylov.  Taxonomic identification of algae (morphological and molecular): species concepts, methodologies, and their implications for ecological bioassessment , 2014, Journal of phycology.

[27]  Algal Database—Bioprospecting indigenous algae for industrial application , 2013 .

[28]  Lalit K. Pandey,et al.  Morphological abnormalities in periphytic diatoms as a tool for biomonitoring of heavy metal pollution in a river , 2014 .