Understanding Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry: A Framework Based on Biased Competition

Starting from early scientific explorations of binocular rivalry, researchers have wondered about the degree to which an observer can exert voluntary attentional control over rivalry dynamics. The answer to this question would not only reveal the extent to which we may determine our own conscious visual experience, but also advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying binocular rivalry. Classic studies, intriguingly, reached contradictory conclusions, ranging from an absence of attentional control, as advocated by Breese, to nearly complete control of rivalry dynamics, as reported by Helmholtz. Recent investigations have revisited this question, but the results have continued to echo the conflicting findings of earlier studies, seemingly precluding a comprehensive understanding of attentional effects on rivalry. Here, we review both classic and modern studies, and propose a unifying framework derived from the biased competition theory of attention. The key assumption of this theory is that the nature of stimulus conflict determines the limits of attentional modulation. For example, a condition in which unresolved stimulus conflict transpires through many levels of visual processing should be very susceptible to attentional control. When applied to binocular rivalry, this framework predicts strong attentional modulations under conditions of unresolved stimulus conflict (e.g., initial selection) and conditions where conflict is resolved at higher levels of visual processing (e.g., stimulus rivalry). Additionally, the efficacy of attentional control over rivalry can be increased by utilization of demanding, behaviorally relevant tasks, and likely through perceptual training paradigms. We show that this framework can help facilitate the understanding and synthesis of a diverse set of results on attentional control over rivalry, and we propose several directions for future research on this interesting topic.

[1]  J. Braun,et al.  Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[2]  D. Alais,et al.  On Binocular Alternation , 2000, Perception.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  Binocular rivalry: a time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[5]  Joel Pearson,et al.  Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[6]  L. Lack.  Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry , 1978 .

[7]  R. Peckham.  Eye-movements during "retinal rivalry" , 1936 .

[8]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Parietal cortex and attention , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  M. Peterson,et al.  Multiplicative Effects of Intention on the Perception of Bistable Apparent Motion , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[13]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[14]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry , 2004, Nature.

[15]  R. Blake.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[16]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Onset Rivalry: Brief Presentation Isolates an Early Independent Phase of Perceptual Competition , 2007, PloS one.

[18]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  D. Alais,et al.  Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry , 2010, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  The time course of interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Shifting spatial attention makes you flip: Exogenous visual attention triggers perceptual alternations during binocular rivalry , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  A. Karni,et al.  A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence , 2001, Vision Research.

[23]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry , 1998, Vision Research.

[24]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Task Usefulness Affects Perception of Rivalrous Images , 2010, Psychological science.

[25]  Robert E. Bannon,et al.  SPATIAL SENSE AND MOVEMENTS OF THE EYE , 1948 .

[26]  David Alais,et al.  Multisensory Congruency as a Mechanism for Attentional Control over Perceptual Selection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  N. Logothetis.  Single units and conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[29]  Arash Sahraie,et al.  Influence of emotional facial expressions on binocular rivalry , 2008, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[30]  Kurt Simons,et al.  Amblyopia characterization, treatment, and prophylaxis. , 2005, Survey of ophthalmology.

[31]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks , 2005, Current Biology.

[32]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[33]  G. J. Brouwer,et al.  Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability , 2005, Vision Research.

[34]  Ignace T C Hooge,et al.  The effect of set size on the dynamics of binocular rivalry. , 2011, Seeing and perceiving.

[35]  A. Tsoi,et al.  Improving the Performance of the , 2007 .

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry , 1990, Vision Research.

[37]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Modulates Orientation-Selective Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[38]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  David Whitney,et al.  Attention Narrows Position Tuning of Population Responses in V1 , 2009, Current Biology.

[40]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[41]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness: The Role of Attention , 1999, Perception.

[44]  R. van Ee,et al.  Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. , 2003, Journal of Vision.

[45]  S. Yantis,et al.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  R. Blake,et al.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. , 2007, Emotion.

[47]  M. Carrasco.  Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[48]  S. Kastner,et al.  Interactions of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  N. Moray.  Attention: selective processes in vision and hearing , 1970 .

[50]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Sensitivity Underlying Changes in Visual Consciousness , 2010, Current Biology.

[52]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Long-Term Speeding in Perceptual Switches Mediated by Attention-Dependent Plasticity in Cortical Visual Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[53]  Sheng He,et al.  Local Factors Determine the Stabilization of Monocular Ambiguous and Binocular Rivalry Stimuli , 2004, Current Biology.

[54]  S. Treue.  Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[55]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  M. Washburn,et al.  Motor Factors in Voluntary Control of Cube Perspective Fluctuations and Retinal Rivalry Fluctuations , 1933 .

[57]  B. C. Motter.  Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[59]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[60]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry , 2007, Vision Research.

[62]  R. Blake,et al.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Control of object-based attention in human cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  R. Blake,et al.  Rival ideas about binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[66]  A. B. Nutt.  Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[67]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[68]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Effectively Reducing Sensory Eye Dominance with a Push-Pull Perceptual Learning Protocol , 2010, Current Biology.

[69]  Roger W. Li,et al.  Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[70]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[71]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[72]  Erich Schröger,et al.  On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2011, PloS one.

[73]  R. van Ee,et al.  Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[74]  Zijiang J He,et al.  The Monocular-Boundary-Contour Mechanism in Binocular Surface Representation and Suppression , 2008, Perception.

[75]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceptual learning to reduce sensory eye dominance beyond the focus of top-down visual attention , 2012, Vision Research.

[77]  O. Carter,et al.  Color and Luminance Influence, but Can Not Explain, Binocular Rivalry Onset Bias , 2011, PloS one.

[78]  R. Blake,et al.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[79]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[80]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Requires Visual Attention , 2011, Neuron.

[81]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The Role of Frontal and Parietal Brain Areas in Bistable Perception , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[82]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The Visual Impact of Gossip , 2011, Science.

[83]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[84]  M. Clarke,et al.  Amblyopia , 2006, The Lancet.

[85]  W. Mcdougall,et al.  III.—THE PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF THE ATTENTION-PROCESS (III.) , 1903 .

[86]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[87]  G. Alpers,et al.  Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry , 2006 .

[88]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Disrupting Parietal Function Prolongs Dominance Durations in Binocular Rivalry , 2010, Current Biology.

[89]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Push–pull training reduces foveal sensory eye dominance within the early visual channels , 2012, Vision Research.

[90]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[91]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Fusion and Rivalry Are Dependent on the Perceptual Meaning of Visual Stimuli , 2004, Current Biology.

[92]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention Speeds Binocular Rivalry , 2006, Psychological science.

[93]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry , 2001, Vision Research.

[94]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Binocular battles on multiple fronts , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[95]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  A Distributed Intercortical Processing of Binocular Rivalry: Psychophysical Evidence , 2003, Perception.

[96]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Influence of Spatial Frequency, Luminance, and Duration on Binocular Rivalry and Abnormal Fusion of Briefly Presented Dichoptic Stimuli , 1983, Perception.

[97]  Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry , 2007, Vision Research.

[98]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[99]  R. Desimone.  Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[100]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[101]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[102]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Report Experience-Driven Plasticity in Binocular Vision , 2010 .

[103]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  The Role of Voluntary and Involuntary Attention in Selecting Perceptual Dominance during Binocular Rivalry , 2007, Perception.

[104]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  ERP evidence that surface-based attention biases interocular competition during rivalry. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[105]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  John H Reynolds,et al.  Object-based attention to one of two superimposed surfaces alters responses in human early visual cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[107]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[108]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing , 2009, Vision Research.

[109]  A. Thiele,et al.  Attention alters spatial integration in macaque V1 in an eccentricity-dependent manner , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[110]  C. Bellone,et al.  ON A ROLE , 1996 .

[111]  M. Wertheimer.  Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[112]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[113]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[114]  R. Wilfred George,et al.  The Significance of the Fluctuations Experienced in Observing Ambiguous Figures and in Binocular Rivalry , 1936 .

[115]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry , 2011, Vision Research.

[116]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Interacting competitive selection in attention and binocular rivalry. , 2005, Progress in brain research.