ROVERS: Incentive-Based Recruitment of Connected Vehicles for Urban Big Data Collection

The growth in mobile devices results in constant generation and consumption of a large amount of data by mobile users on the go which is unbearable by the current mobile networks in terms of cost and bandwidth. At the same time, the technological advancements in modern vehicles allow us to harness their computing, caching, and communication capabilities to support various smart city applications. It is now possible to recruit a set of connected vehicles to collect, store, and share heterogeneous information regarding urban streets and facilitate citizens with different location-aware services. However, for a user to find and retrieve relevant content among the fleet of hundreds of vehicles on urban roads is challenging due to high mobility and intermittent connectivity. To address this, in this paper we propose ROVERS for a service provider to recruit the best set of vehicles to facilitate users on urban streets with different location-based applications. To identify the best vehicles, we first use a distributed ranking scheme CarRank, where the vehicle autonomously classifies itself as important with respect to urban users’ interest. Then, we present a centralized recruitment scheme, exploiting game-theory for the service provider to fairly and optimally select the best vehicles under desired coverage, redundancy, and quality requirements. Comparative analysis after in-depth simulations using realistic mobility traces of 2986 vehicles shows that the set of vehicles selected using ROVERS yield better results compared to other selection approaches.

[1]  Hongji Chen,et al.  GoSense: Efficient Vehicle Selection for User Defined Vehicular Crowdsensing , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[2]  Zhangdui Zhong,et al.  Duration-Variable Participant Recruitment for Urban Crowdsourcing With Indeterministic Trajectories , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  George Pavlou,et al.  Information-Centric Connectivity , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Zheng Yang,et al.  Vehicle-Based Bi-Objective Crowdsourcing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Qi Zhang,et al.  An Autonomous Information Collection and Dissemination Model for Large-Scale Urban Road Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Reputation-Aware, Trajectory-Based Recruitment of Smart Vehicles for Public Sensing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Yacine Ghamri-Doudane,et al.  Car Rank: An Information-Centric Identification of Important Smart Vehicles for Urban Sensing , 2015, 2015 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications.

[8]  Qi Li,et al.  Sustainable Incentive Mechanisms for Mobile Crowdsensing: Part 1 , 2017, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[9]  Jianwei Niu,et al.  Comprehensive tempo-spatial data collection in crowd sensing using a heterogeneous sensing vehicle selection method , 2016, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[10]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Opportunistic coverage for urban vehicular sensing , 2015, Comput. Commun..

[11]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  High quality participant recruitment in vehicle-based crowdsourcing using predictable mobility , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[12]  Alexander Afanasyev,et al.  On the Evolution of ndnSIM , 2017, Comput. Commun. Rev..

[13]  Shu Yang,et al.  Multi-Task Oriented Participant Recruitment for Vehicular Crowdsensing , 2017, IOV.

[14]  Raffaele Bruno,et al.  Efficient data collection in multimedia vehicular sensing platforms , 2013, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[15]  Zhongcheng Li,et al.  A Truthful Incentive Mechanism for Online Recruitment in Mobile Crowd Sensing System , 2017, Sensors.

[16]  Xin-Ping Guan,et al.  Trajectory-based node selection scheme in vehicular crowdsensing , 2015, 2015 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC).

[17]  Xiumin Wang,et al.  Mobility-Aware Participant Recruitment for Vehicle-Based Mobile Crowdsensing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Marco Fiore,et al.  Generation and Analysis of a Large-Scale Urban Vehicular Mobility Dataset , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[19]  En Wang,et al.  User Recruitment for Optimizing Requester’s Profit in Self-Organized Mobile Crowdsensing , 2018, IEEE Access.

[20]  Antonio Capone,et al.  Bandwidth and Cache Leasing in Wireless Information-Centric Networks: A Game-Theoretic Study , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[21]  He Chen,et al.  Pricing and Resource Allocation via Game Theory for a Small-Cell Video Caching System , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  Yacine Ghamri-Doudane,et al.  SAVING: socially aware vehicular information-centric networking , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[23]  Bengt Ahlgren,et al.  A survey of information-centric networking , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.