Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: a weak relationship in adult humans

Abstract This paper investigates the relationship between formant frequencies and body size in human adults. In Experiment I, correlation coefficients were obtained between acoustic correlates of the five Spanish vowels uttered by 82 speakers as a function of speakers’ heights and weights. In Experiment II correlations were calculated from formant parameters obtained by means of a long-term average analysis of connected speech from 91 speakers. Results of both experiments showed that, in contrast to Fitch's (J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 (1997) 1213) findings in macaque vocalizations, the relationship within sex between formant parameters and body size is very weak in human adults. At the same time, it is evident that correlations within the female group are greater than in male group. These results imply that the pattern of individual vocal tract development is relatively free from skeletal size constraints, due to the human descent of larynx from standard mammal position. This disassociation of vocal tract-body size is more important in human males.

[1]  N J Lass,et al.  An investigation of speaker height and weight identification. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[3]  R. Mosteller.  Simplified calculation of body-surface area. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[5]  H. Hollien,et al.  Longitudinal research on adolescent voice change in males. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H. D. Steklis,et al.  Neurobiology of Social Communication in Primates: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1981 .

[8]  K. Scherer,et al.  Social Markers in Speech , 1980 .

[9]  H J Künzel,et al.  How Well Does Average Fundamental Frequency Correlate with Speaker Height and Weight? , 1989, Phonetica.

[10]  A. Quilis.  Fonética acústica de la lengua española , 1981 .

[11]  Harry Hollien,et al.  Speaker identification by long‐term spectra under normal and distorted speech conditions , 1977 .

[12]  E. Morton.  On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[13]  P. Boersma.  ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[14]  P A Busby,et al.  Formant frequency values of vowels produced by preadolescent boys and girls. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[16]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W. V. van Dommelen,et al.  Acoustic Parameters in Speaker Height and Weight Identification: Sex-Specific Behaviour , 1995, Language and speech.

[18]  S. Collins,et al.  Men's voices and women's choices , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Takeshi Nishimura.  Comparative morphology of the hyo-laryngeal complex in anthropoids: two steps in the evolution of the descent of the larynx , 2002, Primates.

[20]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[21]  Mosteller Rd.  Simplified Calculation of Body-Surface Area , 1987 .

[22]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  U. Jürgens.  2 – Neural Control of Vocalization in Nonhuman Primates , 1979 .

[24]  P. Trudgill,et al.  Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech , 1979 .

[25]  W. Fitch.  The evolution of speech: a comparative review , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  K. Johnson,et al.  Formants of children, women, and men: the effects of vocal intensity variation. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Wim A. van Dommelen,et al.  Speaker height and weight identification: a re-evaluation of some old data , 1993 .

[28]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[29]  Robert Brazy.  The Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Larynx , 1952 .

[30]  N J Lass,et al.  Correlational study of speakers' heights, weights, body surface areas, and speaking fundamental frequencies. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[32]  W. Tecumseh,et al.  Vocal Tract Length Perception and the Evolution of Language , 1994 .

[33]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Development of speech sounds in children. , 1969, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[34]  W. Fitch,et al.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[36]  S. Linville,et al.  Vocal tract resonance analysis of aging voice using long-term average spectra. , 2001, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[37]  J. González,et al.  Percepción a través de la voz de las características físicas del hablante: identificación de la estatura a partir de una frase o una vocal , 2004 .

[38]  W. Fitch.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .