A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE To develop an ultrasonographic (US) synovitis scoring system suitable for evaluation of finger joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare semiquantitative US scoring with quantitative US measurements. METHODS US was performed at the palmar and dorsal sides of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in 10 healthy subjects and in the clinically more affected hand in 46 RA patients. Ten patients additionally underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Synovitis was measured, standardized, and scored according to a semiquantitative method. The 2 methods (semiquantitative US scoring, quantitative US) were compared and statistical cutoffs were identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. MRI results were compared with semiquantitative US scoring and quantitative US results. The optimal US scoring method from 6 joint combinations was identified (ROC curve analysis). RESULTS Synovitis was most frequently detected in the palmar proximal area (86% of affected joints). We found no significant differences between individual PIP joints or between individual MCP joints, indicating that all fingers within each of these joint groups should be treated equally for statistical calculations, although each joint group as a whole should be treated separately. The optimal cutoff point to distinguish between "health" and "pathology" was 0.6 mm both for MCP joints (sensitivity 94%, specificity 89%) and for PIP joints (sensitivity 90%, specificity 88%). There was no significant difference between semiquantitative US scores and quantitative US measurements. The best results for joint combinations were achieved using the "sum of 4 fingers" (second through fifth MCP and PIP joints) and "sum of 3 fingers" (second through fourth MCP and PIP joints) methods. Comparison of MRI results with semiquantitative US scores revealed high concordance. CONCLUSION US evaluation of finger joint synovitis can be considerably simplified by focusing on the palmar side and by applying semiquantitative grading instead of quantitative measurements. For evaluation of treatment efficacy based on synovitis in RA patients, we recommend using the "sum of 3 fingers" method in longitudinal trials.

[1]  J. Edmonds,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  P. Emery,et al.  Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in Europe: results of a rheumatologist-based survey at a EULAR meeting. , 2003, Rheumatology.

[3]  W. Grassi,et al.  Synovitis of small joints: sonographic guided diagnostic and therapeutic approach , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  C. Metz.  Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[5]  A. Scheel,et al.  Ultrasonographic assessment of finger and toe joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by Szkudlarek et al. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: comparison with the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the synovium. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Quantification of synovistis by MRI: correlation between dynamic and static gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and microscopic and macroscopic signs of synovial inflammation. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  F. Arnett.  Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[10]  P. Emery,et al.  The role of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[11]  K J Wolf,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. , 1990, Radiology.

[12]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Radiographic damage of large joints in long-term rheumatoid arthritis and its relation to function. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[14]  H K Genant,et al.  How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis? , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  F. van Leuven,et al.  The use of Achilles tendon ultrasonography for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. , 2001, Atherosclerosis.

[16]  Neal Stewart,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Summary of OMERACT 6 MR Imaging Module. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  D. Kane,et al.  Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[19]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis – why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored , 2003, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[20]  Paul Bird,et al.  Computerized measurement of magnetic resonance imaging erosion volumes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with existing magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems and standard clinical outcome measures. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  G. Stucki,et al.  A new method of scoring radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments , 2012 .

[23]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis , 2002, European Radiology.

[24]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[25]  W. Grassi,et al.  Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  F. Strutz,et al.  Impact of chronic LDL-apheresis treatment on Achilles tendon affection in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia: a clinical and ultrasonographic 3-year follow-up study. , 2004, Atherosclerosis.

[27]  John D. Isaacs,et al.  The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  Neal Stewart,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI Score. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[29]  Paul Bird,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[30]  H. Genant,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Studies Module. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[31]  E. Gromnica-ihle,et al.  Standard reference values for musculoskeletal ultrasonography , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[32]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[33]  U. Mödder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and miniarthroscopy of metacarpophalangeal joints: sensitive detection of morphologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[34]  W. Schmidt.  Value of sonography in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis , 2001, The Lancet.

[35]  Carola Werner,et al.  Nonparametric methods for analysing the accuracy of diagnostic tests with multiple readers , 2005, Statistical methods in medical research.

[36]  O. Tervonen,et al.  Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[37]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[38]  Tania Schink,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder joint: comparison of conventional radiography, ultrasound, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[39]  M. Kauppi,et al.  US assessment of hip joint synovitis in rheumatic diseases: A comparison with MR imaging , 2003 .

[40]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[41]  W. Grassi,et al.  Finger tendon involvement in rheumatoid arthritis , 1995 .

[42]  H. Bliddal,et al.  Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of synovial inflammation of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[43]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: a very promising method still needing more validation , 2004, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[44]  A. Becker,et al.  MR-morphologische Veränderungen der Metacarpophalangealgelenke bei Rheumatoider Arthritis: Vergleich früher und später Stadien , 2001 .

[45]  C. Peterfy.  New developments in imaging in rheumatoid arthritis , 2003, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[46]  D Loreck,et al.  Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints , 2002, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.