Reappraisal of fetal abdominal circumference in an Asian population: analysis of 50,131 records.

OBJECTIVE Fetuses from different populations may show different growth patterns. In obstetrics, fetal abdominal circumference (AC) is a very useful index for assessing fetal growth. In this study, we attempted to establish the normal fetal growth curves of AC in an Asian population in South Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed our computer ultrasound database of fetal AC records from January 1991 to December 2006. During the study period of 16 years, only the fetuses examined by ultrasonography with gestational age between 14 and 41 weeks were included. We excluded extreme bilateral records after initial analysis. Eventually, 50,131 records of AC were included for final analysis. RESULTS The observed gestation-specific AC values and the predicted AC values were calculated. The best-fit regression equation of AC versus gestational age is a second-order polynomial equation. In general, fetal AC values in our population showed similar patterns to those in Western populations. Besides, we established a table of the predicted AC values based on specific gestational age, including the 5 th , 10 th , 50 th , 90 th and 95 th centiles, for clinical reference. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, our series is the largest sample of AC reported in the medical literature. We believe that the gestational age-specific nomogram of fetal AC is important for further clinical assessment of fetal growth.

[1]  M. Duyme,et al.  French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  D. Bruzzese,et al.  Fetal size charts for the Italian population. Normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones , 2005, Prenatal diagnosis.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  J E Fleming,et al.  The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: findings in 3512 pregnancies , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  E. Guzman,et al.  Revisiting sonographic abdominal circumference measurements: a comparison of outer centiles with established nomograms , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  T. Moore,et al.  A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  A. Hofman,et al.  Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  R. Tamura,et al.  Percentile ranks of sonar fetal abdominal circumference measurements. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Jeong Yeon Cho,et al.  Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry , 2007, Prenatal diagnosis.