Perspective - The Flaring of Intellectual Outliers: An Organizational Interpretation of the Generation of Novelty in the RAND Corporation

Much of intellectual history is punctuated by the flaring of intellectual outliers, small groups of thinkers who briefly, but decisively, influence the development of ideas, technologies, policies, or worldviews. To understand the flaring of intellectual outliers, we use archival and interview data from the RAND Corporation after the Second World War. We focus on five factors important to the RAND experience: 1 a belief in fundamental research as a source of practical ideas, 2 a culture of optimistic urgency, 3 the solicitation of renegade ambition, 4 the recruitment of intellectual cronies, and 5 the facilitation of the combinatorics of variety. To understand the subsequent decline of intellectual outliers at RAND, we note that success yields a sense of competence, endurance in a competitive world, and the opportunity and inclination to grow. Self-confidence, endurance, and growth produce numerous positive consequences for an organization; but for the most part, they undermine variety. Outliers and the conditions that produce them are not favored by their environments. Engineering solutions to this problem involve extending time and space horizons, providing false information about the likelihoods of positive returns from exploration, buffering exploratory activities from the pressures of efficiency, and protecting exploration from analysis by connecting it to dictates of identities.

[1]  Thinking about War and Peace: Andrew Marshall and the Early Development of the Intellectual Foundations for Net Assessment , 2013 .

[2]  John F. Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Organizations and Markets , 2012 .

[3]  Harold Brown,et al.  Star Spangled Security: Applying Lessons Learned over Six Decades Safeguarding America , 2012 .

[4]  K. Starkey BOOK REVIEW MIE AUGIER AND JAMES G. MARCH. (2011). THE ROOTS, RITUALS, AND RHETORICS OF CHANGE : NORTH AMERICAN BUSINESS SCHOOLS AFTER SECOND WORLD WAR. STANDFORD, CA : STANFORD BUSINESS BOOKS. , 2011 .

[5]  James G. March,et al.  The Ambiguities of Experience , 2010 .

[6]  P. Shapira,et al.  Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research , 2009 .

[7]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective , 2007, Scientometrics.

[8]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics , 2007, Scientometrics.

[9]  Cynthia C. Kelly Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project: Insights Into J. Robert Oppenheimer, "Father of the Atomic Bomb" , 2005 .

[10]  J. McCoy,et al.  Linking the Physical Work Environment to Creative Context , 2005 .

[11]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  The medium is the message , 2005 .

[12]  Robert M. Siegmann Review of "Bell labs: Life in the Crown Jewel" by Narain Gehani, Silicon Press , 2003, UBIQ.

[13]  K. Nelson,et al.  Technology, institutions, and innovation systems , 2002 .

[14]  P. Tetlock Heuristics and Biases: Theory-Driven Reasoning about Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics , 2002 .

[15]  Philip Mirowski Machine Dreams Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science , 2001 .

[16]  J. March,et al.  Adaptation as Information Restriction: The Hot Stove Effect , 2001 .

[17]  M. Augier,et al.  Simon Says: Bounded Rationality Matters , 2001 .

[18]  J. Digby Early Rand: Personalities and Projects as Recalled in the Alumni Bulletin , 2001 .

[19]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  Chemical Engineering as a General Purpose Technology , 2000 .

[20]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[21]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Theory-Driven Reasoning About Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics: Are We Prisoners of Our Preconceptions? , 1999 .

[22]  Michael A. Hiltzik,et al.  Dealers of lightning : Xerox PARC and the dawn of the computer age , 1999 .

[23]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[24]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[26]  G. Zachary,et al.  Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century , 1998 .

[27]  L. E. Kay Rethinking Institutions: Philanthropy as an Historiographic Problem of Knowledge and Power , 1997 .

[28]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  The Cold War, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946-1962 , 1997 .

[29]  Harold J. Leavitt,et al.  The Old Days, Hot Groups, and Managers' Lib. , 1996 .

[30]  Charles J. Hitch Management Problems of Large Organizations , 1996, Oper. Res..

[31]  M. Dennis "Our First Line of Defense": Two University Laboratories in the Postwar American State , 1994, Isis.

[32]  Lily E. Kay,et al.  The molecular vision of life : Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the rise of the new biology , 1994 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[34]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[35]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation , 1992 .

[36]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of My Life , 1991 .

[37]  S. Kostof America by Design , 1987 .

[38]  G. R. Feiwel Arrow and the ascent of modern economic theory , 1987 .

[39]  P. Forman Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Basis for Physical Research in the United States, 1940-1960 , 1987 .

[40]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications , 1986 .

[41]  Lillian Hoddeson The entry of the quantum theory of solids into the Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1925–40: A case-study of the industrial application of fundamental science , 1980 .

[42]  W. A. Wallis The Statistical Research Group, 1942–1945 , 1980 .

[43]  H. Rowen Assessing the Role of Systematic Decision Making in the Public Sector , 1970 .

[44]  H. White,et al.  Chains of Opportunity , 2014 .

[45]  A. George The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making , 1969 .

[46]  Bruce L. R. Smith,et al.  The Rand Corporation: Case Study of a Nonprofit Advisory Corporation. , 1966 .

[47]  Robert S. McNamara,et al.  A modern design for defense decision : a McNamara-Hitch-Enthoven anthology , 1966 .

[48]  R. Cargill Hall,et al.  Early U. S. Satellite Proposals , 1963 .

[49]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[50]  R. D. Specht Rand---A Personal View of its History , 1960 .

[51]  C. Hitch THE USES OF ECONOMICS , 1960 .

[52]  B. O. Koopman Fallacies in Operations Research , 1956 .

[53]  Charles J. Hitch,et al.  An Appreciation of Systems Analysis , 1955, Oper. Res..

[54]  H. Kahn,et al.  Methods of Reducing Sample Size in Monte Carlo Computations , 1953, Oper. Res..

[55]  Charles J. Hitch,et al.  Sub-Optimization in Operations Problems , 1953, Oper. Res..

[56]  A FLEXNER,et al.  [The usefulness of useless knowledge]. , 1952, Medicina del deporte y del trabajo.

[57]  R. L. Hall,et al.  PRICE THEORY AND BUSINESS BEHAVIOUR , 1939 .

[58]  R. Merton Social Structure and Anomie , 1938 .

[59]  Abraham Flexner,et al.  Universities: American English German , 1931 .

[60]  A. Fleming,et al.  A History of Engineering , 1926, Nature.