Forging a link between mentoring and collaboration: a new training model for implementation science

BackgroundTraining investigators for the rapidly developing field of implementation science requires both mentoring and scientific collaboration. Using social network descriptive analyses, visualization, and modeling, this paper presents results of an evaluation of the mentoring and collaborations fostered over time through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) supported by Implementation Research Institute (IRI).MethodsData were comprised of IRI participant self-reported collaborations and mentoring relationships, measured in three annual surveys from 2012 to 2014. Network descriptive statistics, visualizations, and network statistical modeling were conducted to examine patterns of mentoring and collaboration among IRI participants and to model the relationship between mentoring and subsequent collaboration.ResultsFindings suggest that IRI is successful in forming mentoring relationships among its participants, and that these mentoring relationships are related to future scientific collaborations. Exponential random graph network models demonstrated that mentoring received in 2012 was positively and significantly related to the likelihood of having a scientific collaboration 2 years later in 2014 (p = 0.001). More specifically, mentoring was significantly related to future collaborations focusing on new research (p = 0.009), grant submissions (p = 0.003), and publications (p = 0.017). Predictions based on the network model suggest that for every additional mentoring relationships established in 2012, the likelihood of a scientific collaboration 2 years later is increased by almost 7 %.ConclusionsThese results support the importance of mentoring in implementation science specifically and team science more generally. Mentoring relationships were established quickly and early by the IRI core faculty. IRI fellows reported increasing scientific collaboration of all types over time, including starting new research, submitting new grants, presenting research results, and publishing peer-reviewed papers. Statistical network models demonstrated that mentoring was strongly and significantly related to subsequent scientific collaboration, which supported a core design principle of the IRI. Future work should establish the link between mentoring and scientific productivity. These results may be of interest to team science, as they suggest the importance of mentoring for future team collaborations, as well as illustrate the utility of network analysis for studying team characteristics and activities.

[1]  Jenine K. Harris,et al.  Systems analysis of collaboration in 5 national tobacco control networks. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[2]  Timothy R. Huerta,et al.  Transdisciplinarity among tobacco harm-reduction researchers: a network analytic approach. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Kara L Hall,et al.  Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Kasisomayajula Viswanath,et al.  The role of transdisciplinary collaboration in translating and disseminating health research: lessons learned and exemplars of success. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  David A. Chambers,et al.  Research and services partnerships: partnership: a fundamental component of dissemination and implementation research. , 2013, Psychiatric Services.

[6]  T. Marrelli.  Mental health: A report of the surgeon general , 2000 .

[7]  L. Kohn,et al.  COMMITTEE ON QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE IN AMERICA , 2000 .

[8]  Bernard C. K. Choi,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. , 2006, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[9]  Steven M. Goodreau,et al.  Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models applied to a large social network , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[10]  D. Luke,et al.  Breaking Down Silos: Mapping Growth of Cross‐Disciplinary Collaboration in a Translational Science Initiative , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[11]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.

[12]  Jenine K. Harris,et al.  Network Influences on Dissemination of Evidence-Based Guidelines in State Tobacco Control Programs , 2013, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[13]  S. Straus,et al.  Designing a knowledge translation mentorship program to support the implementation of evidence-based innovations , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.

[14]  G. Kuperminc,et al.  Mentoring Programs: A Framework to Inform Program Development, Research, and Evaluation. , 2006 .

[15]  Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski,et al.  Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science. , 2011, Research Evaluation.

[16]  Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood,et al.  A literature review of learning collaboratives in mental health care: used but untested. , 2014, Psychiatric services.

[17]  Bradley A. Evanoff,et al.  Academic Cross-Pollination: The Role of Disciplinary Affiliation in Research Collaboration , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Mark L. Poteet,et al.  Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégeé: a meta-analysis. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  Dissemination and implementation research in health : translating science to practice , 2012 .

[20]  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan,et al.  Social Network Analysis to Assess the Impact of the CTSA on Biomedical Research Grant Collaboration , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[21]  Jenine K. Harris.  An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph Modeling , 2013 .

[22]  Nicole M. Moore,et al.  Measuring the evolution and output of cross-disciplinary collaborations within the NCI Physical Sciences–Oncology Centers Network , 2013, Research Evaluation.

[23]  Douglas A. Luke,et al.  Viewing Dissemination and Implementation Research through a Network Lens , 2012 .

[24]  Enola K Proctor,et al.  The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States , 2013, Implementation Science.

[25]  Bryan J Weiner,et al.  The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health , 2013, Implementation Science.

[26]  Michael Fleming,et al.  Mentoring K Scholars: Strategies to Support Research Mentors , 2011, Clinical and Translational Science.

[27]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Jenine K. Harris,et al.  Network Analysis in Public Health: History, Methods, and Applications , 2022 .

[29]  Navneet K. Dhand,et al.  Q Fever Knowledge, Attitudes and Vaccination Status of Australia’s Veterinary Workforce in 2014 , 2016, PloS one.

[30]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[31]  G. Colditz,et al.  Developing educational competencies for dissemination and implementation research training programs: an exploratory analysis using card sorts , 2015, Implementation Science.

[32]  Graham A. Colditz,et al.  The Promise and Challenges of Dissemination and Implementation Research , 2012 .

[33]  Ross C Brownson,et al.  A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. , 2008, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.