A Simplified Approach to Risk Assessment Based on System Dynamics: An Industrial Case Study

Seveso plants are complex sociotechnical systems, which makes it appropriate to support any risk assessment with a model of the system. However, more often than not, this step is only partially addressed, simplified, or avoided in safety reports. At the same time, investigations have shown that the complexity of industrial systems is frequently a factor in accidents, due to interactions between their technical, human, and organizational dimensions. In order to handle both this complexity and changes in the system over time, this article proposes an original and simplified qualitative risk evaluation method based on the system dynamics theory developed by Forrester in the early 1960s. The methodology supports the development of a dynamic risk assessment framework dedicated to industrial activities. It consists of 10 complementary steps grouped into two main activities: system dynamics modeling of the sociotechnical system and risk analysis. This system dynamics risk analysis is applied to a case study of a chemical plant and provides a way to assess the technological and organizational components of safety.

[1]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Learning from disaster : risk management after Bhopal , 1994 .

[2]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[3]  Franck Guarnieri,et al.  Modélisation dynamique des systèmes industriels à risques , 2010 .

[4]  John Andrews,et al.  Reliability and Risk Assessment , 1994 .

[5]  G Dusserre,et al.  The use of water sprays for mitigating chlorine gaseous releases escaping from a storage shed , 2003 .

[6]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries , 2016 .

[7]  Bernard Walliser,et al.  Systèmes et modèles : introduction critique à l'analyse de systèmes : essai , 1977 .

[8]  M. Paté-Cornell.  Learning from the Piper Alpha Accident: A Postmortem Analysis of Technical and Organizational Factors , 1993 .

[9]  Franck Guarnieri,et al.  Modéliser les Accidents et les Catastrophes Industrielles: La Méthode STAMP , 2012 .

[10]  Franck Guarnieri,et al.  A system dynamics model for behavioral analysis of safety conditions in a chemical storage unit , 2013 .

[11]  Daniel H. Kim.  Introduction to Systems Thinking , 1999 .

[12]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[13]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Applying STAMP in Accident Analysis , 2003 .

[14]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Emergence of Risks: Contributing Factors , 2010 .

[15]  David L. Cooke,et al.  A system dynamics analysis of the Westray mine disaster , 2003 .

[16]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Safety and Risk -Driven Design in Complex Systems -of - Systems , 2005 .

[17]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  n-Compartment mathematical model for transient evaluation of fluid curtains in mitigating chlorine releases , 2007 .

[18]  Moosung Jae,et al.  A quantitative assessment of LCOs for operations using system dynamics , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Moosung Jae,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of Organizational Factors Affecting Safety Using System Dynamics Model , 2004 .

[20]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[21]  Franck Guarnieri,et al.  DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MODELLING TO IMPROVE RISK ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF SEVESO INDUSTRIES , 2009 .

[22]  Jaime Santos-Reyes,et al.  A systemic approach to managing safety , 2008 .

[23]  Franck Guarnieri,et al.  Modelling and Hazard Analysis for Contaminated Sediments Using STAMP Model and STPA Tool , 2011 .