The effects of predator presence and shoal size on foraging in bluntnose minnows,Pimephales notatus

SynopsisShoals of 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 bluntnose minnows,Pimephales notatus, were allowed to forage in the absence and presence of a fish predator, which was separated from the shoal by a clear plexiglass partition. A typical dilution effect was observed in that individual fish in larger shoals were approached less frequently by the predator. In the absence of a predator, foraging latency decreased significantly and the rate of foraging increased with increasing shoal size. Foraging latency for each shoal size tended to increase in the presence of a predator and foraging rate decreased, significantly for shoals of 7, 15, and 20 fish. Members of larger shoals were safer and enjoyed a greater level of food consumption, perhaps due to decreased individual vigilance for predators and social facilitation. However, foraging effort decreased when a predator was present, as more time was allocated to predator avoidance.

[1]  B. Bertram,et al.  Vigilance and group size in ostriches , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Constraints Placed by Predators on Feeding Behaviour , 1986 .

[3]  B. Seghers.  Facultative schooling behavior in the spottail shiner (Notropis hudsonius): possible costs and benefits , 1981, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[4]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Osamu Ohguchi,et al.  Prey density and selection against oddity by three-spined sticklebacks , 1981 .

[6]  The effects of increasing shoal size on handling time in Goldfish, Carassius auratus L. , 1984 .

[7]  J. Crook.  The adaptive significance of avian social organisations , 1964 .

[8]  W. Foster,et al.  The effects of group size on predator avoidance in a marine insect , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  K. R. Mckaye,et al.  Comments on the breeding biology of Gobiomorus dormitor (Osteichthyes : Eleotridae) and the advantage of schooling behavior to its fry , 1979 .

[10]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Fish in larger shoals find food faster , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  W. B. Scott,et al.  Freshwater fishes of Canada , 1974 .

[12]  D. Lendrem.  Predation risk and vigilance in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  G. Turner,et al.  Attack Abatement: A Model for Group Protection by Combined Avoidance and Dilution , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[14]  W. Foster,et al.  Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect , 1981, Nature.

[15]  J. Lazarus.  Flock Size and Behaviour in Captive Red-Billed Weaverbirds (Quelea Quelea): Implications for Social Facilitation and the Functions of Flocking , 1979 .

[16]  W. G. Holmes.  Predation risk and foraging behavior of the hoary marmot in Alaska , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio) I. The stimulus for escape , 1974 .

[18]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Group Foraging: The Skill Pool Effect and Frequency-Dependent Learning , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[19]  T. Pitcher.  Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts , 1986 .

[20]  D. Eggers.  Theoretical Effect of Schooling by Planktivorous Fish Predators on Rate of Prey Consumption , 1976 .

[21]  J. Godin,et al.  Predator avoidance and school size in a cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus Lesueur) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  T. J. Pitcher,et al.  Foraging, timidity and shoal size in minnows and goldfish , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  J. Godin,et al.  Antipredator benefits of schooling behaviour in a cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) , 1985 .