Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration.

Gravity driven ultrafiltration was operated in dead-end mode without any flushing or cleaning. In contrary to general expectations, the flux value stabilized after about one week of operation and remained constant during an extended period of time (several months). Different surface water types and diluted wastewater were used as feed water and, depending on the feed water composition, stable flux values were in the range of 4-10 L h(-1) m(-2). When sodium azide was added to the feed water to diminish the biological activity, no stabilization of flux occurred, indicating that biological processes play an important role in the flux stabilization process. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed the presence of a biofouling layer, of which the structure changed over time, leading to relatively heterogeneous structures. It is assumed that the stabilization of flux is related to the development of heterogeneous structures in the fouling layer, due to biological processes in the layer. The phenomenon of flux stabilization opens interesting possibilities for application, for instance in simple and low-cost ultrafiltration systems for decentralized drinking water treatment in developing and transition countries, independent of energy supply, chemicals, or complex process control.

[1]  T. Egli,et al.  Isolation and characterization of low nucleic acid (LNA)-content bacteria , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[2]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem. , 2009, Water research.

[3]  J. Lai,et al.  Membrane biofouling by extracellular polymeric substances or soluble microbial products from membrane bioreactor sludge , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  D P Saroj,et al.  Impact of chemical cleaning and air-sparging on the critical and sustainable flux in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  P. Stewart,et al.  Quantitative analysis of biofilm thickness variability , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Richard A. Snyder,et al.  Feeding behaviour and grazing impacts of a Euplotes sp. on attached bacteria , 1998 .

[7]  Kyung-Min Yeon,et al.  Correlating TMP increases with microbial characteristics in the bio-cake on the membrane surface in a membrane bioreactor. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  S. Schiewer,et al.  Long-term flux improvement by air sparging and backflushing for a membrane bioreactor, and modeling permeability decline , 2008 .

[9]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration , 2006 .

[10]  F. Frimmel,et al.  A new method for the characterization of organic carbon in aquatic systems , 1992 .

[11]  S. Kjelleberg,et al.  Microbial landscapes: new paths to biofilm research. , 2007, Nature reviews. Microbiology.

[12]  J. Hofman,et al.  Biofouling of membranes for drinking water production , 1998 .

[13]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Bacterial community composition and structure of biofilms developing on nanofiltration membranes applied to wastewater treatment. , 2007, Water research.

[14]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[15]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Rapid and direct estimation of active biomass on granular activated carbon through adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) determination. , 2007, Water research.

[16]  Albert S Kim,et al.  EPS biofouling in membrane filtration: an analytic modeling study. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  Sunny Wang,et al.  Direct observation of microbial adhesion to membranes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Intra-layer flow in fouling layer on membranes , 2007 .

[19]  S. Kjelleberg,et al.  Cell Death in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Development , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  G. Amy,et al.  Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. , 2006, Water research.

[21]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[22]  J. Costerton,et al.  Microbial Biofilms , 2011 .

[23]  K. Kimura,et al.  Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. , 2004, Water research.

[24]  Hans-Curt Flemming,et al.  Biofouling—the Achilles heel of membrane processes☆ , 1997 .

[25]  T. Egli,et al.  Rapid, cultivation-independent assessment of microbial viability in drinking water. , 2008, Water research.

[26]  Guven Ozdemir,et al.  Extracellular polysaccharides produced by cooling water tower biofilm bacteria and their possible degradation , 2008, Biofouling.

[27]  S. Kjelleberg,et al.  Opinion: Microbial landscapes: new paths to biofilm research , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[28]  Z. Lewandowski,et al.  Liquid Flow in Biofilm Systems , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[29]  Wouter Pronk,et al.  Decentralized systems for potable water and the potential of membrane technology. , 2009, Water research.

[30]  I. Chang,et al.  Correlation of biofouling with the bio-cake architecture in an MBR , 2008 .

[31]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[32]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  A critical flux to avoid biofouling of spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Fact or fiction? , 2009 .

[33]  Kyung-Min Yeon,et al.  Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[34]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Fouling mechanisms of deflocculated sludge, normal sludge, and bulking sludge in membrane bioreactor , 2007 .

[35]  Mark D. Sobsey,et al.  Managing Water in the Home: Accelerated Health Gains from Improved Water Supply , 2002 .

[36]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Characterization of membrane biofouling in nanofiltration processes of wastewater treatment , 2005 .

[37]  A. Karabelas,et al.  An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery , 2008 .

[38]  W. Pronk,et al.  Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. , 2007, Water research.

[39]  Charles Gerba,et al.  Laboratory assessment of a gravity-fed ultrafiltration water treatment device designed for household use in low-income settings. , 2009, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[40]  A. Bjørkøy,et al.  Characterization of biofouling on hollow fiber membranes using confocal laser scanning microcscopy and image analysis , 2009 .

[41]  I. Sutherland,et al.  The biofilm matrix--an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. , 2001, Trends in microbiology.

[42]  F. Frimmel,et al.  A liquid chromatographic system with multi-detection for the direct analysis of hydrophilic organic compounds in natural waters , 1992 .

[43]  Yoshimasa Watanabe,et al.  Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  W. J. Ng,et al.  Engineering design approaches for minimum fouling in submerged MBR , 2004 .

[45]  H. Yamamura,et al.  Mechanism involved in the evolution of physically irreversible fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes used for drinking water treatment. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  J. Costerton,et al.  Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[47]  Wen-Tso Liu,et al.  Biofilm formation characteristics of bacterial isolates retrieved from a reverse osmosis membrane. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.