Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate

The promise of tremendous computational power, coupled with the development of robust error-correcting schemes, has fuelled extensive efforts to build a quantum computer. The requirements for realizing such a device are confounding: scalable quantum bits (two-level quantum systems, or qubits) that can be well isolated from the environment, but also initialized, measured and made to undergo controllable interactions to implement a universal set of quantum logic gates. The usual set consists of single qubit rotations and a controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate, which flips the state of a target qubit conditional on the control qubit being in the state 1. Here we report an unambiguous experimental demonstration and comprehensive characterization of quantum CNOT operation in an optical system. We produce all four entangled Bell states as a function of only the input qubits' logical values, for a single operating condition of the gate. The gate is probabilistic (the qubits are destroyed upon failure), but with the addition of linear optical quantum non-demolition measurements, it is equivalent to the CNOT gate required for scalable all-optical quantum computation.

[1]  Mark R. Morris,et al.  MECHANISMS FOR MASS LOSS FROM COOL STARS. , 1987 .

[2]  Hong,et al.  Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[3]  N. Soker Jet formation in the transition from the asymptotic giant branch to planetary nebulae , 1992 .

[4]  Hood,et al.  Measurement of conditional phase shifts for quantum logic. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[5]  M. Morris,et al.  Evidence for Rapid Rotation of the Carbon Star V Hydrae , 1995 .

[6]  B. E. Kane A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer , 1998, Nature.

[7]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  Quantum information is physical , 1997, cond-mat/9710259.

[8]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations , 1999, Nature.

[9]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[10]  S. Rappaport,et al.  The Formation of Very Narrow Waist Bipolar Planetary Nebulae , 1999, astro-ph/9911140.

[11]  E. Knill,et al.  A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[12]  THE X-RAY SYSTEM R AQUARII: A TWO-SIDED JET AND CENTRAL SOURCE , 2001, astro-ph/0111386.

[13]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Entanglement purification for quantum communication , 2000, Nature.

[14]  Masato Koashi,et al.  Probabilistic manipulation of entangled photons , 2001 .

[15]  W. Munro,et al.  The bell inequality: A measure of entanglementa? , 2001, quant-ph/0102119.

[16]  S. Takeuchi,et al.  Beamlike twin-photon generation by use of type II parametric downconversion. , 2001, Optics letters.

[17]  I. Chuang,et al.  Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance , 2001, Nature.

[18]  Christian Kurtsiefer,et al.  High efficiency entangled photon pair collection in type II parametric fluorescence , 2001, quant-ph/0101074.

[19]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Measurement of qubits , 2001, quant-ph/0103121.

[20]  J. D. Franson,et al.  Probabilistic quantum logic operations using polarizing beam splitters , 2001, quant-ph/0107091.

[21]  J. Franson,et al.  Demonstration of nondeterministic quantum logic operations using linear optical elements. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[22]  Shigeki Takeuchi,et al.  Quantum phase gate for photonic qubits using only beam splitters and postselection , 2001, quant-ph/0111092.

[23]  Jon A. Morse,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope Images of the HH 34 Jet and Bow Shock: Structure and Proper Motions , 2002 .

[24]  D. James,et al.  Atomic-vapor-based high efficiency optical detectors with photon number resolution. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[25]  H. Imai,et al.  A collimated jet of molecular gas from a star on the asymptotic giant branch , 2002, Nature.

[26]  A. Imamoğlu High efficiency photon counting using stored light. , 2002, Physical Review Letters.

[27]  Axel Kuhn,et al.  Deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[28]  N. K. Langford,et al.  Linear optical controlled- NOT gate in the coincidence basis , 2002 .

[29]  Jonathan P. Dowling,et al.  Single-photon quantum-nondemolition detectors constructed with linear optics and projective measurements , 2002 .

[30]  F. Schmidt-Kaler,et al.  Realisation of the Cirac-Zoller controlled-NOT quantum gate , 2003, 2003 European Quantum Electronics Conference. EQEC 2003 (IEEE Cat No.03TH8665).

[31]  Yu. A. Pashkin,et al.  Quantum oscillations in two coupled charge qubits , 2002, Nature.

[32]  M. J. Fitch,et al.  Experimental controlled-NOT logic gate for single photons in the coincidence basis , 2003, quant-ph/0303095.

[33]  N. Soker Pairs of Bubbles in Planetary Nebulae and Clusters of Galaxies , 2003, astro-ph/0306616.

[34]  D. Leibfried,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate , 2003, Nature.

[35]  Yoshihisa Yamamoto,et al.  Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device , 2002, Nature.

[36]  F. Schmidt-Kaler,et al.  Realization of the Cirac–Zoller controlled-NOT quantum gate , 2003, Nature.

[37]  A. D. Boozer,et al.  Generation of nonclassical photon pairs for scalable quantum communication with atomic ensembles , 2003, Nature.

[38]  G. Milburn,et al.  Experimental requirements for Grover’s algorithm in optical quantum computation , 2003, quant-ph/0306081.

[39]  R. Sahai,et al.  Shaping Proto-Planetary and Young Planetary Nebulae with Collimated Fast Winds , 2002, astro-ph/0211510.

[40]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum Cryptography , 2005, Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security.