CHARACTERIZATION OF TRUCK-MOUNTED ATOMIZATION EQUIPMENT TYPICALLY USED IN VECTOR CONTROL1

ABSTRACT The control of medically important arthropod vectors of human and animal disease is a high priority for both public health and military officials. Because droplet size of pesticide spray material is a critical factor affecting vector control applications, the droplet-size spectra produced by 11 sprayers and 3 spray formulations were evaluated. Droplet-size spectra were measured by a laser diffraction instrument, a hot-wire system, and rotating slides. There were considerable differences in the droplet-size spectra produced by the different sprayers tested. The volume median diameter (DV0.5) for the water-based sprays ranged from 4.7 to 211 µm, depending on the sprayer, and the percent of spray volume contained in droplets less than 20 µm (%vol <20 µm) ranged between 0.5% and 98.9%. The DV0.5 measurements for the oil-based sprays ranged from 9.4 to 125.3 µm and the %vol <20 µm ranged between 2.4% and 97.9%. The correlations between the DV0.5 measured by the laser system (DV0.5-laser) and the mass median diameter, Sauter diameter, and DV0.5 measured by the AIMS probe were all significant. Generally, the slide DV0.5s were numerically similar to the DV0.5 from the laser system and the Sauter diameter from the Army Insecticide Measuring System probe. There was less consistent agreement between the % <32 µm values obtained from the slides and those from the other 2 samplers. The information presented can be used by applicators to select the sprayer that produces the droplet-size spectra needed for their particular application situation.

[1]  J. Dukes,et al.  A comparison of Teflon slides and the Army Insecticide Measuring System for sampling aerosol clouds. , 1993, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[2]  C. Himel,et al.  The Optimum Size for Insecticide Spray Droplets , 1969 .

[3]  Max V Meisch,et al.  AERIAL ULTRA-LOW–VOLUME ASSESSMENT OF ANVIL 10+10® AGAINST ANOPHELES QUADRIMACULATUS , 2005, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[4]  Daniel E. Martin,et al.  DROPLET-SIZE CHARACTERIZATION OF HANDHELD ATOMIZATION EQUIPMENT TYPICALLY USED IN VECTOR CONTROL1 , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[5]  Wesley Clint Hoffmann,et al.  COMPARISON OF THREE IMAGING SYSTEMS FOR WATER-SENSITIVE PAPERS , 2005 .

[6]  Crockett Rj,et al.  Efficacy of Biomist 30:30 and Aqua Reslin against Anopheles quadrimaculatus in Arkansas. , 2002 .

[7]  Curtis Ga,et al.  Influence of ground ULV droplet spectra on adulticide efficacy for Aedes taeniorhynchus. , 1996 .

[8]  R J Crockett,et al.  Efficacy of Biomist 30:30 and Aqua Reslin against Anopheles quadrimaculatus in Arkansas. , 2002, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[9]  T. Younglove,et al.  Droplet size characterization of three aerial malathion spray programs , 1994, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[10]  Rathburn Methods of assessing droplet size of insecticidal sprays and fogs. , 1970 .

[11]  C. S. Lofgren,et al.  Size of aerosol droplets impinging on mosquitoes as determined with a scanning electron microscope. , 1973, Journal of economic entomology.

[12]  C. Tuck,et al.  How surface tension of surfactant solutions influences the characteristics of sprays produced by hydraulic nozzles used for pesticide application , 2001 .