Ups and downs in the theory of temporal reference

This paper proposes a method for computing the temporal aspects of the interpretations of a variety of Germa sentences. The method is strictly modular in the sense that it allows each meaning-bearing sentence constituent to make its own, separate, contribution to the semantic representation of any sentence containing it. The semantic representation of a sentence is reached in several stages. First, an ‘initial semantic representation’ is constructed, using a syntactic analysis of the sentence as input. This initial representation is then transformed into the definitive representation by a series of transformations which reflect the ways in which the contributions from different constituents of the sentence interact. Since the different constituents which make their respective contributions to the meaning of the sentence are in most instances ambiguous, the initial representations are typically of a high degree of underspecification.

[1]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Negation and the Temporal Structure of Narrative Discourse , 1999, J. Semant..

[2]  Michel Aurnague,et al.  Semantics of Time, Space, Movement and spatio-temporal reasoning , 1993 .

[3]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of Philosophical Logic , 2002 .

[4]  HANS KAMP,et al.  REMARKS ON LEXICAL STRUCTURE AND DRS CONSTRUCTION , 1994 .

[5]  Kees van Deemter.  On the Composition of Meaning , 1991 .

[7]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Temporal Prepositional Phrases with Quantifiers: Some Additions to Pratt and Francez (2001) , 2002 .

[8]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Time in language. , 2000 .

[9]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Eine erweiterte Extended Now-Theorie für Perfekt und Futur , 1999 .

[10]  H. D. Swart,et al.  Adverbs of quantification : a generalized quantifier approach , 1993 .

[11]  H. Savin,et al.  The projection problem for presuppositions , 1971 .

[12]  Hans Kamp,et al.  Linguistic form and its computation , 2001 .

[13]  Toshiyuki Ogihara.  Adverbial Quantifiers , Maximal Situations , and “ Weak ” E-type Pronouns * , 2003 .

[14]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[15]  Kurt Eberle,et al.  Ereignisse: Ihre Logik und Ontologie aus textsemantischer Sicht , 1991, IWBS Report.

[16]  Nissim Francez,et al.  Temporal Prepositions and Temporal Generalized Quantifiers , 2001 .

[17]  Michel Aurnague,et al.  Semantics of Time, Space, and Movement. , 1994 .

[18]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  Talking about trees, scope and concepts , 2005 .

[19]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[20]  Renate Musan,et al.  The German Perfect: Its Semantic Composition and its Interactions with Temporal Adverbials , 2002 .

[21]  P. Horwich.  The Composition of Meanings , 1997 .

[22]  R. Montague.  Formal philosophy; selected papers of Richard Montague , 1974 .

[23]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[24]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Quantification and Syntactic Theory , 1983 .

[25]  Marianne Celce-Murcia,et al.  The English perfect : tense-choice and pragmatic inferences , 1978 .

[26]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  An analysis of the German perfekt , 2000 .

[27]  Tomek Strzalkowski,et al.  From Discourse to Logic , 1991 .

[28]  Telmo Móia,et al.  Identifying and Computing Temporal Locating Adverbials with a Particular Focus on Portuguese and English , 2002 .

[29]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification: Construction, Representation and Deduction , 1993, J. Semant..

[30]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[31]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Always and Only: Why Not All Focus-Sensitive Operators Are Alike , 2003 .

[32]  Elena Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Observations about the form and meaning of the Perfect , 2003 .

[33]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Aspect shift and coercion , 1998 .

[34]  R. Musan.  The German Perfect , 2002 .

[35]  Toshiyuki Ogihara,et al.  Double-access sentences and reference to states , 1995 .

[36]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Introduction: the modules of Perfect constructions , 2003 .

[37]  George admires Adolf,et al.  Tense and Aspect , 2004 .

[38]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Temporality , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[39]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  Handbook of Logic and Language , 1996 .

[40]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Case, scope, and binding , 1993 .

[41]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  Studies in linguistic semantics , 1979 .

[42]  Kees van Deemter,et al.  Semantic ambiguity and underspecification , 1996 .

[43]  M. Garman,et al.  Tense and aspect , 1986 .

[44]  R. Sandt,et al.  Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , 1999 .

[45]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  Co-Indexing Labelled DRSs to Represent and Reason with Ambiguities , 1995, ArXiv.

[46]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[47]  Terence Parsons,et al.  Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .