Voting before discussing: computer voting as social communication

Presents a case study on the use of an alternative method of computer support to that normally used, one that uses voting as a tool for social rather than rational choice. This voting-before-discussion (VBD) method is indicated in cases where agreement is an important group output, or where inter-personal conflict is creating problems in meetings. Given that participants are warned to avoid "groupthink", the VBD method seems to increase group unity, reduce inter-personal conflict and speed up decision making, while still allowing argument and analysis. The method is based on a three-process integrative theory of group interaction, which proposes that group cohesion arises primarily from normative influences rather than rational information exchange. If this model is correct, the VBD method may be just one of many new possible ways that computer support can be tailored to support group processes according to the nature of the group and the situation.

[1]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload , 1985, CACM.

[2]  Randy Hirokawa.  GROUP COMMUNICATION AND PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF GROUP PHASES , 1983 .

[3]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Utilizing GDSS technology: Final report on a recent empirical study , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  Will Distributed GSS Groups Make More Extreme Decisions? An Empirical Study , 1996, ICIS.

[5]  Feedback III: Sequence Effects , 1975 .

[6]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[7]  Brian Whitworth,et al.  Measuring disagreement in groups facing limited-choice problems , 1999, DATB.

[8]  Brian Whitworth,et al.  Generating group agreement in cooperative computer-mediated groups: towards an integrative model of group interaction , 1997 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems as innovation: A study of the innovation process , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[10]  K. Lewin,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Personality , 1936 .

[11]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a decade of group support systems research , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts , 1977 .

[14]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action , 1992 .

[15]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[16]  N. Maier.  Problem-solving discussions and conferences : leadership methods and skills , 1963 .

[17]  M. Winniford,et al.  Issues in automated voting , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 1991 .

[19]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[20]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[21]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[22]  M. Lea,et al.  Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer-mediated communication. , 1991 .

[23]  Brian Whitworth,et al.  Generating Agreement in Computer-Mediated Groups , 2001 .

[24]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Revision, Weighting, and commitment in consensus group judgment , 1990 .

[25]  Kate M. Kaiser,et al.  Using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed locations: a preliminary analysis of participant satisfaction , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[27]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.  Generality of a theory of collective induction: face-to-face and computer-mediated interaction, amount of potential information, and group versus member choice of evidence , 1995 .

[29]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[30]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in computer-mediated groups , 1997 .

[31]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[32]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Computer‐mediated communication requirements for group support , 1991 .

[33]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  The effect of choosing on confidence in choice , 1990 .

[34]  Fraser J. M. Reid,et al.  The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication , 1996 .

[35]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. , 1974 .

[36]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[37]  J. Hackman,et al.  Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups , 1974 .

[38]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Group Confidence Pressures in Iterative Decisions , 1982 .

[39]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992 .

[40]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[41]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Task Requirements and Media Choice in Collaborative Writing , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  I. Janis.  Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[43]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed group support systems: experimental design and pilot study , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[44]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.