Computer-aided antibody design

Recent clinical trials using antibodies with low toxicity and high efficiency have raised expectations for the development of next-generation protein therapeutics. However, the process of obtaining therapeutic antibodies remains time consuming and empirical. This review summarizes recent progresses in the field of computer-aided antibody development mainly focusing on antibody modeling, which is divided essentially into two parts: (i) modeling the antigen-binding site, also called the complementarity determining regions (CDRs), and (ii) predicting the relative orientations of the variable heavy (VH) and light (VL) chains. Among the six CDR loops, the greatest challenge is predicting the conformation of CDR-H3, which is the most important in antigen recognition. Further computational methods could be used in drug development based on crystal structures or homology models, including antibody–antigen dockings and energy calculations with approximate potential functions. These methods should guide experimental studies to improve the affinities and physicochemical properties of antibodies. Finally, several successful examples of in silico structure-based antibody designs are reviewed. We also briefly review structure-based antigen or immunogen design, with application to rational vaccine development.

[1]  R. K. Brown BIOPHYSICS , 1931 .

[2]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[3]  S. Tonegawa Somatic generation of antibody diversity , 1983, Nature.

[4]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[5]  C. Chothia,et al.  Domain association in immunoglobulin molecules. The packing of variable domains. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  T. A. Jones,et al.  Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[7]  J. Thornton,et al.  Continuous and discontinuous protein antigenic determinants , 1986, Nature.

[8]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  K. D. Hardman,et al.  Single-chain antigen-binding proteins. , 1988, Science.

[10]  R. Dwek,et al.  Glycobiology , 2018, Biochimie.

[11]  Lutz Riechmann,et al.  Reshaping human antibodies for therapy , 1988, Nature.

[12]  Jiří Novotný,et al.  Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm , 1988, Nature.

[13]  A. Lesk,et al.  Structural determinants of the conformations of medium‐sized loops in proteins , 1989, Proteins.

[14]  A C Martin,et al.  Modeling antibody hypervariable loops: a combined algorithm. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Lesk,et al.  Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions , 1989, Nature.

[16]  R. Glockshuber,et al.  A comparison of strategies to stabilize immunoglobulin Fv-fragments. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[17]  A Tramontano,et al.  Framework residue 71 is a major determinant of the position and conformation of the second hypervariable region in the VH domains of immunoglobulins. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  A. Lesk,et al.  Common features of the conformations of antigen‐binding loops in immunoglobulins and application to modeling loop conformations , 1992, Proteins.

[19]  S. Smith‐Gill,et al.  Experimental analysis by site-directed mutagenesis of somatic mutation effects on affinity and fine specificity in antibodies specific for lysozyme. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[20]  Johan Desmet,et al.  The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning , 1992, Nature.

[21]  R L Stanfield,et al.  Major antigen-induced domain rearrangements in an antibody. , 1993, Structure.

[22]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  S Suhai,et al.  Prediction of hypervariable CDR-H3 loop structures in antibodies. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[25]  Melinda Fitzgerald,et al.  Immunol. Cell Biol. , 1995 .

[26]  G. Cohen,et al.  Interactions of protein antigens with antibodies. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  M. V. Regenmortel,et al.  Mapping Epitope Structure and Activity: From One-Dimensional Prediction to Four-Dimensional Description of Antigenic Specificity , 1996 .

[29]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 in antibodies , 1996, FEBS letters.

[30]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  The Immunological Evolution of Catalysis , 1996, Science.

[31]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Protein design automation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  A Tramontano,et al.  Antibody structure, prediction and redesign. , 1997, Biophysical chemistry.

[33]  P. Schultz,et al.  Crystal structures of the free and liganded form of an esterolytic catalytic antibody. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[36]  A. McCoy,et al.  Electrostatic complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  A. Murzin,et al.  The 2.0-A resolution crystal structure of a trimeric antibody fragment with noncognate VH-VL domain pairs shows a rearrangement of VH CDR3. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Automated classification of antibody complementarity determining region 3 of the heavy chain (H3) loops into canonical forms and its application to protein structure prediction. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  A. Kidera,et al.  Conformational sampling of CDR-H3 in antibodies by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  C Chothia,et al.  Structural determinants in the sequences of immunoglobulin variable domain. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimizing electrostatic affinity in ligand-receptor binding: Theory, computation, and ligand properties , 1998 .

[42]  A Tramontano,et al.  Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Mutual stabilization of VL and VH in single-chain antibody fragments, investigated with mutants engineered for stability. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[44]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Conformational analysis of the first observed non-proline cis-peptide bond occurring within the complementarity determining region (CDR) of an antibody. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  L Wang,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Different equilibrium stability behavior of ScFv fragments: identification, classification, and improvement by protein engineering. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[47]  C. Dobson Protein misfolding, evolution and disease. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[48]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Junctional amino acids determine the maturation pathway of an antibody. , 1999, Immunity.

[49]  N. Nakajima,et al.  Enhanced conformational diversity search of CDR‐H3 in antibodies: Role of the first CDR‐H3 residue , 1999, Proteins.

[50]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  H3‐rules: identification of CDR‐H3 structures in antibodies , 1999, FEBS letters.

[51]  M. Levitt,et al.  De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  E. Söderlind,et al.  Recombining germline-derived CDR sequences for creating diverse single-framework antibody libraries , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[54]  A R Rees,et al.  WAM: an improved algorithm for modelling antibodies on the WEB. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[55]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Marc De Maeyer,et al.  The Dead-End Elimination Theorem: , 2000 .

[57]  A Tramontano,et al.  Antibody modeling: implications for engineering and design. , 2000, Methods.

[58]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[59]  A. Sali,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.

[60]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Stability engineering of antibody single-chain Fv fragments. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  L L Looger,et al.  Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable: implications for protein design and structural genomics. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Yet another numbering scheme for immunoglobulin variable domains: an automatic modeling and analysis tool. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  K Nishikawa,et al.  Knowledge-based potential defined for a rotamer library to design protein sequences. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[64]  K Furukawa,et al.  A Role of the Third Complementarity-determining Region in the Affinity Maturation of an Antibody* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  N. Sinha,et al.  Differences in electrostatic properties at antibody-antigen binding sites: implications for specificity and cross-reactivity. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[66]  D. Burton Antibodies, viruses and vaccines , 2002, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[67]  Kim K. Baldridge,et al.  Flexibility and molecular recognition in the immune system , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Enrique Vargas-Madrazo,et al.  Modifications to canonical structure sequence patterns: Analysis for L1 and L3 , 2002, Proteins.

[69]  C. Borrebaeck,et al.  Antibody evolution beyond Nature , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[70]  Andrew C. R. Martin,et al.  SACS-Self-maintaining database of antibody crystal structure information , 2002, Bioinform..

[71]  Rama Ranganathan,et al.  Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[72]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Immunogenicity of peptide-vaccine candidates predicted by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  Kouhei Tsumoto,et al.  The Role of Hydrogen Bonding via Interfacial Water Molecules in Antigen-Antibody Complexation , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[74]  David Baker,et al.  Protein–protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment , 2003, Proteins.

[75]  S. Smith‐Gill,et al.  X-ray snapshots of the maturation of an antibody response to a protein antigen , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[76]  Enrique Vargas‐Madrazo,et al.  An improved model of association for VH–VL immunoglobulin domains: Asymmetries between VH and VL in the packing of some interface residues , 2003, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[77]  C. Dobson,et al.  Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide andprotein aggregation rates , 2003, Nature.

[78]  N. Sinha,et al.  Modeling the binding sites of anti-hen egg white lysozyme antibodies HyHEL-8 and HyHEL-26: an insight into the molecular basis of antibody cross-reactivity and specificity. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[79]  Ronald M Levy,et al.  Have we seen all structures corresponding to short protein fragments in the Protein Data Bank? An update. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[80]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The specificity of cross‐reactivity: Promiscuous antibody binding involves specific hydrogen bonds rather than nonspecific hydrophobic stickiness , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[81]  J. Engler,et al.  Expressed murine and human CDR-H3 intervals of equal length exhibit distinct repertoires that differ in their amino acid composition and predicted range of structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[82]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Antibody Multispecificity Mediated by Conformational Diversity , 2003, Science.

[83]  B. Honig,et al.  A hierarchical approach to all‐atom protein loop prediction , 2004, Proteins.

[84]  Salvador Ventura,et al.  Short amino acid stretches can mediate amyloid formation in globular proteins: the Src homology 3 (SH3) case. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  Ana Cauerhff,et al.  Structural mechanism for affinity maturation of an anti-lysozyme antibody. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  L. Serrano,et al.  Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[87]  A. Rees,et al.  Antibody Variable Regions , 2004 .

[88]  Wayne C Koff,et al.  HIV vaccine design and the neutralizing antibody problem , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[89]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Prediction of the absolute aggregation rates of amyloidogenic polypeptide chains. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[90]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[91]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[92]  Marie-Paule Lefranc,et al.  IMGT/3Dstructure-DB and IMGT/StructuralQuery, a database and a tool for immunoglobulin, T cell receptor and MHC structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[93]  F. Papavasiliou,et al.  The regulation of somatic hypermutation. , 2004, Current opinion in immunology.

[94]  K. Misura,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 59:15–29 (2005) Progress and Challenges in High-Resolution Refinement of Protein Structure Models , 2022 .

[95]  David Baker,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 58:893–904 (2005) A “Solvated Rotamer ” Approach to Modeling Water- Mediated Hydrogen Bonds at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2022 .

[96]  Arthur M Lesk,et al.  Molecular forces in antibody maturation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[97]  Ida Retter,et al.  VBASE2, an integrative V gene database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[98]  C. J. Bond,et al.  A structure-based database of antibody variable domain diversity. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[99]  Fred Dyda,et al.  Water molecules in the antibody-antigen interface of the structure of the Fab HyHEL-5-lysozyme complex at 1.7 A resolution: comparison with results from isothermal titration calorimetry. , 2005, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[100]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Prediction of aggregation rate and aggregation‐prone segments in polypeptide sequences , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[101]  L. Serrano,et al.  Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[102]  C. Rapp,et al.  Crystal packing effects on protein loops , 2005, Proteins.

[103]  L. Wilkinson Immunity , 1891, The Lancet.

[104]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Simulations as analytical tools to understand protein aggregation and predict amyloid conformation. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[105]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure‐based computational design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[106]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Flexible protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[107]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  Generation of a flexible loop structural ensemble and its application to induced-fit structural changes following ligand binding , 2006, Biophysics.

[108]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Structural model of the mAb 806-EGFR complex using computational docking followed by computational and experimental mutagenesis. , 2006, Structure.

[109]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  High-resolution protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[110]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[111]  Herman W. T. van Vlijmen,et al.  Trends in Antibody Sequence Changes during the Somatic Hypermutation Process , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[112]  Ian F. Thorpe,et al.  Antibody evolution constrains conformational heterogeneity by tailoring protein dynamics , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[113]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Shapes of antibody binding sites: qualitative and quantitative analyses based on a geomorphic classification scheme. , 2006, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[114]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Synthetic therapeutic antibodies , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[115]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Computational models for the prediction of polypeptide aggregation propensity. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[116]  P. Carter Potent antibody therapeutics by design , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[117]  R. Friesner,et al.  Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program , 2006, Proteins.

[118]  Oleg V. Koliasnikov,et al.  Antibody Cdr H3 Modeling Rules: Extension for the Case of Absence of Arg H94 and Asp H101 , 2006, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[119]  M Rosenberg,et al.  Computational protein design: a novel path to future protein drugs. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[120]  O. Lund,et al.  Prediction of residues in discontinuous B‐cell epitopes using protein 3D structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[121]  Patrice Duroux,et al.  IMGT/LIGM-DB, the IMGT® comprehensive database of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor nucleotide sequences , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[122]  Doheon Lee,et al.  Specificity of molecular interactions in transient protein–protein interaction interfaces , 2006, Proteins.

[123]  András Fiser,et al.  Saturating representation of loop conformational fragments in structure databanks , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.

[124]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[125]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Design of Multi-Specificity in Protein Interfaces , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[126]  Francesc X. Avilés,et al.  AGGRESCAN: a server for the prediction and evaluation of "hot spots" of aggregation in polypeptides , 2007, BMC Bioinform..

[127]  B. Braden,et al.  Affinity maturation increases the stability and plasticity of the Fv domain of anti-protein antibodies. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[128]  BMC Bioinformatics , 2005 .

[129]  P. Bourne,et al.  Antibody-protein interactions: benchmark datasets and prediction tools evaluation , 2007 .

[130]  N. Sinha,et al.  Understanding antibody–antigen associations by molecular dynamics simulations: Detection of important intra- and inter-molecular salt bridges , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[131]  Ian F. Thorpe,et al.  Molecular evolution of affinity and flexibility in the immune system , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[132]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  The PASTA server for protein aggregation prediction. , 2007, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[133]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Progress in computational protein design. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[134]  Akbar Nayeem,et al.  Loopholes and missing links in protein modeling , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[135]  Andrew C. R. Martin,et al.  Analyzing the "degree of humanness" of antibody sequences. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[136]  David Baker,et al.  RosettaDock in CAPRI rounds 6–12 , 2007, Proteins.

[137]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  High-resolution design of a protein loop , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[138]  J. C. Almagro,et al.  Humanization of antibodies. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[139]  M. Neuberger,et al.  Antibody diversification by somatic mutation: from Burnet onwards , 2008, Immunology and cell biology.

[140]  L. A. Clark,et al.  A knowledge‐based forcefield for protein–protein interface design , 2007, Proteins.

[141]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies as innovative therapeutics. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[142]  Mark C Evans,et al.  Recent advances in immunoinformatics: application of in silico tools to drug development. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[143]  F. Ding,et al.  Probing protein aggregation using discrete molecular dynamics. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[144]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Toward better refinement of comparative models: Predicting loops in inexact environments , 2008, Proteins.

[145]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Novel affinity tag system using structurally defined antibody‐tag interaction: Application to single‐step protein purification , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[146]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[147]  Andrew C. R. Martin,et al.  Analysis and improvements to Kabat and structurally correct numbering of antibody variable domains. , 2008, Molecular immunology.

[148]  M. Oda,et al.  Exploring the energy landscape of antibody-antigen complexes: protein dynamics, flexibility, and molecular recognition. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[149]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Modeling the structure of mAb 14B7 bound to the anthrax protective antigen , 2007, Proteins.

[150]  Peter Timmerman,et al.  Affinity maturation of antibodies assisted by in silico modeling , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[151]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 revisited: A lesson in antibody modeling , 2008, Proteins.

[152]  Kristiina Takkinen,et al.  Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. , 2008 .

[153]  Yang Zhang Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[154]  Paolo Marcatili,et al.  PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures , 2008, Bioinform..

[155]  S. Takada,et al.  Dynamic energy landscape view of coupled binding and protein conformational change: Induced-fit versus population-shift mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[156]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[157]  Barry Honig,et al.  Loop modeling: Sampling, filtering, and scoring , 2007, Proteins.

[158]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Submitting antibodies to binding arbitration. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[159]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Systematic classification of CDR‐L3 in antibodies: Implications of the light chain subtypes and the VL–VH interface , 2009, Proteins.

[160]  J. Mascola,et al.  Relationship between Antibody 2F5 Neutralization of HIV-1 and Hydrophobicity of Its Heavy Chain Third Complementarity-Determining Region , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[161]  Bernhardt L. Trout,et al.  Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[162]  Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al.  Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[163]  Chi Zhang,et al.  Prediction of antigenic epitopes on protein surfaces by consensus scoring , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[164]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Multi‐constraint computational design suggests that native sequences of germline antibody H3 loops are nearly optimal for conformational flexibility , 2009, Proteins.

[165]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  RosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[166]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Toward high‐resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen docking , 2009, Proteins.

[167]  Stanley R. Krystek,et al.  Closing the side-chain gap in protein loop modeling , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[168]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[169]  Bernhardt L Trout,et al.  Aggregation-prone motifs in human immunoglobulin G. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[170]  P. Scolnik mAbs , 2009 .

[171]  Franklin Peale,et al.  Variants of the Antibody Herceptin That Interact with HER2 and VEGF at the Antigen Binding Site , 2009, Science.

[172]  Satoshi Ohara,et al.  High Affinity Anti-inorganic Material Antibody Generation by Integrating Graft and Evolution Technologies , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[173]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  In silico vaccine design based on molecular simulations of rhinovirus chimeras presenting HIV-1 gp41 epitopes. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[174]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Development trends for therapeutic antibody fragments , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[175]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Energy-based analysis and prediction of the orientation between light- and heavy-chain antibody variable domains. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[176]  Rino Rappuoli,et al.  Vaccinology in the genome era. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[177]  Maria Pamela C. David,et al.  Using simple artificial intelligence methods for predicting amyloidogenesis in antibodies , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[178]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of affinity and specificity at protein-protein interfaces. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[179]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Improving the species cross-reactivity of an antibody using computational design. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[180]  Naresh Chennamsetty,et al.  Predictive tools for stabilization of therapeutic proteins , 2009, mAbs.

[181]  L. Croner,et al.  Conserved amino acid networks involved in antibody variable domain interactions , 2009, Proteins.

[182]  Yoonjoo Choi,et al.  FREAD revisited: Accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm , 2010, Proteins.

[183]  R. Levy,et al.  Antigenic characteristics of rhinovirus chimeras designed in silico for enhanced presentation of HIV-1 gp41 epitopes [corrected]. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[184]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The role of CDR H3 in antibody recognition of a synthetic analog of a lipopolysaccharide antigen. , 2010, Glycobiology.

[185]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[186]  D. Baker,et al.  Elicitation of structure-specific antibodies by epitope scaffolds , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[187]  Floyd E Romesberg,et al.  Molecular description of flexibility in an antibody combining site. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[188]  E. Pai,et al.  Ablation of the Complementarity-Determining Region H3 Apex of the Anti-HIV-1 Broadly Neutralizing Antibody 2F5 Abrogates Neutralizing Capacity without Affecting Core Epitope Binding , 2010, Journal of Virology.

[189]  G. Gilliland,et al.  Noncanonical conformation of CDR L1 in the anti-IL-23 antibody CNTO4088. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications.

[190]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  A generalized approach to sampling backbone conformations with RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 13–19 , 2010, Proteins.

[191]  Andrew C. R. Martin,et al.  Analysis and prediction of VH/VL packing in antibodies. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[192]  Hiroki Shirai,et al.  Use of amino acid composition to predict epitope residues of individual antibodies. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[193]  William R Taylor,et al.  De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design , 2009, Proteins.

[194]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[195]  Luigi Calzolai,et al.  Rapid structural characterization of human antibody-antigen complexes through experimentally validated computational docking. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[196]  Andrew C. R. Martin,et al.  The humanness of macaque antibody sequences. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[197]  Bernhardt L Trout,et al.  Prediction of aggregation prone regions of therapeutic proteins. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[198]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Antibodies as a model system for comparative model refinement , 2010, Proteins.

[199]  Michail Yu. Lobanov,et al.  FoldAmyloid: a method of prediction of amyloidogenic regions from protein sequence , 2010, Bioinform..

[200]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  Potential Aggregation-Prone Regions in Complementarity-Determining Regions of Antibodies and Their Contribution Towards Antigen Recognition: A Computational Analysis , 2010, Pharmaceutical Research.

[201]  On the domain pairing in chimeric antibodies. , 2010, Molecular immunology.

[202]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  Computational design of epitope-scaffolds allows induction of antibodies specific for a poorly immunogenic HIV vaccine epitope. , 2010, Structure.

[203]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  Computational protein design using flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing: case studies in structure-based antigen design. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[204]  S. Reddy,et al.  Systems analysis of adaptive immunity by utilization of high-throughput technologies. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[205]  Y. Duan,et al.  Probing the stability-limiting regions of an antibody single-chain variable fragment: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2011, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[206]  Bernhardt L Trout,et al.  Aggregation in protein-based biotherapeutics: computational studies and tools to identify aggregation-prone regions. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[207]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  A free-energy landscape for coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein in explicit solvent from detailed all-atom computations. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[208]  S. Kaveri,et al.  “Rational Vaccine Design” for HIV Should Take into Account the Adaptive Potential of Polyreactive Antibodies , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[209]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  Coupling of Aggregation and Immunogenicity in Biotherapeutics: T- and B-Cell Immune Epitopes May Contain Aggregation-Prone Regions , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[210]  Peter M Tessier,et al.  Mutational analysis of domain antibodies reveals aggregation hotspots within and near the complementarity determining regions , 2011, Proteins.

[211]  A. Tramontano,et al.  Structural repertoire of immunoglobulin λ light chains , 2011, Proteins.

[212]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  The association of heavy and light chain variable domains in antibodies: implications for antigen specificity , 2011, The FEBS journal.

[213]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[214]  O. Keskin,et al.  Transient protein-protein interactions. , 2011, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[215]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Effects of somatic mutations on CDR loop flexibility during affinity maturation , 2011, Proteins.

[216]  P. Labute,et al.  Antibody modeling assessment , 2011, Proteins.

[217]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Assessment of flexible backbone protein design methods for sequence library prediction in the therapeutic antibody Herceptin–HER2 interface , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.