Researching far right groups on Twitter: Methodological challenges 2.0

The Internet poses a number of challenges for academics. Internet specificities such as anonymity, the decontextualisation of discourse, the misuse or non-use of references raise methodological questions about the quality and the authenticity of the data available online. This is particularly true when dealing with extremist groups and grass-root militants that cultivate secrecy. Based on a study of the far-right on Twitter, this article explores these methodological issues. It discusses the qualitative indicators we have developed to determine whether a given Twitter account should be included in the sample or not. By using digital traces drawn from profiles, interactions, content and through other visual information, we recontextualize user’s profile and analyze how digital traces participate in providing far right ideas with a wider representation.

[1]  Samuel Kinsley.  The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies , 2014 .

[2]  D. Karpf.  SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODS IN INTERNET TIME , 2012 .

[3]  John B. Thompson.  La nouvelle visibilité , 2005 .

[4]  Karina Horsti,et al.  Digital Islamophobia: The Swedish woman as a figure of pure and dangerous whiteness , 2017, New Media Soc..

[5]  S. Halford,et al.  Big Data: Methodological Challenges and Approaches for Sociological Analysis , 2014 .

[6]  Rogers Brubaker,et al.  Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective , 2017 .

[7]  Claudius Wagemann,et al.  Mobilizing on the Extreme RightGermany, Italy, and the United States , 2012 .

[8]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[9]  Jenny L. Davis,et al.  Context collapse: theorizing context collusions and collisions , 2014 .

[10]  A. Mondon,et al.  Articulations of Islamophobia: from the extreme to the mainstream? , 2017 .

[11]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[12]  Tamara A. Small.  WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .

[13]  Pierre-André Taguieff.  La rhétorique du national-populisme, les règles élémentaires de la propagande xénophobe , 1984 .

[14]  M. Caiani,et al.  The transnationalization of the extreme right and the use of the Internet , 2015 .

[15]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  Petter Törnberg,et al.  Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis , 2016 .

[17]  O. Voirol.  Les luttes pour la visibilité: Esquisse d'une problématique , 2005 .

[18]  Elisabeth Carter.  Right-wing extremism/radicalism: reconstructing the concept , 2018 .

[19]  C. Mudde,et al.  Right-Wing Extremism Analyzed. A Comparative Analysis of the Ideologies of Three Alleged Right-Wing Extremist Parties (NPD, NDP, CP'86) , 1995 .

[20]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology , 2007, Sociology.

[21]  Big data challenge for social sciences and market research : From society and opinion to replications , 2017 .

[22]  Saskia Sassen,et al.  Towards a Sociology of Information Technology , 2002 .

[23]  Mattias Ekman.  Online Islamophobia and the politics of fear: manufacturing the green scare , 2015 .

[24]  N. Marres,et al.  SCRAPING THE SOCIAL? , 2013 .

[25]  Vincent J. Roscigno,et al.  White Supremacists, Oppositional Culture and the World Wide Web , 2005 .

[26]  L. Back.  Aryans reading Adorno: cyber-culture and twenty-firstcentury racism , 2002 .

[27]  Joshua D. Freilich,et al.  Commitment to Extremist Ideology: Using Factor Analysis to Move beyond Binary Measures of Extremism , 2016 .

[28]  T. Butler,et al.  Adoption of geodemographic and ethno-cultural taxonomies for analysing Big Data , 2015 .

[29]  Mike Savage,et al.  Contemporary Sociology and the Challenge of Descriptive Assemblage , 2009 .

[30]  Chris Atton,et al.  Far-right media on the internet: culture, discourse and power , 2006, New Media Soc..

[31]  M. Savage,et al.  Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices , 2013 .

[32]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research , 2000 .

[33]  Farid Hafez.  Shifting borders: Islamophobia as common ground for building pan-European right-wing unity , 2014 .

[34]  L’inscription, le masque et la donnée. Datafication du web et conflits d’interprétation autour des données dans un laboratoire invisible des sciences sociales , 2016 .

[35]  Sarah N. Gatson.  Self-Naming Practices on the Internet: Identity, Authenticity, and Community , 2011 .

[36]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[37]  M. Williams,et al.  Big and broad social data and the sociological imagination: A collaborative response , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[38]  Mitch Berbrier.  The Victim Ideology of White Supremacists and White Separatists in the United States , 2000 .

[39]  D. Cardon.  Regarder les données , 2012 .

[40]  B. Latour,et al.  'The whole is always smaller than its parts': a digital test of Gabriel Tardes' monads. , 2012, The British journal of sociology.

[41]  José Pedro Zúquete.  The new frontlines of right-wing nationalism , 2015 .