TRUCK ACCOMMODATION DESIGN GUIDANCE: DESIGNER WORKSHOP

16. Abstract The number of trucks on many highways in Texas and across the nation has increased to the point that special or unique roadway design treatments may be warranted. Increases in truck traffic have resulted from increases in time-sensitive freight (e.g., just-in-time deliveries), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and until recently a robust economy. As particular corridors have become increasingly dominated by truck traffic, or in locations where truck traffic might reasonably be segregated, questions have arisen regarding accommodations and treatments that may be appropriate for those corridors to address issues caused by truck traffic. This research investigated the sensitivity of current Texas design practice to the unique operating characteristics of large commercial vehicles and determined threshold conditions under which design should reflect these larger vehicles. Findings indicate that serious consideration needs to be given trucks when the average annual daily truck traffic (AADTT) reaches 5000 trucks per day during the design period. When the design AADTT reaches 25,000 trucks per day, there may be justification for considering separated truck roadways with a minimum of two lanes in each direction. This research recommends that the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) consider changes in the following design parameters in its Roadway Design Manual (and/or other appropriate documents): stopping sight distance, intersection and channelization, lane width, shoulder width and composition, sideslopes and drainage features, traffic barrier, passive signs, and acceleration lanes.

[1]  R D Ervin EFFECTS OF EXPRESSWAY RAMPS ON CONTROL OF TRACTOR-SEMITRAILERS , 1986 .

[2]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  CASE STUDIES AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF TRUCK ACCIDENT COUNTERMEASURES ON URBAN FREEWAYS. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[3]  L A Hoel,et al.  ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF TRUCK TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS AND SEPARATION METHODS ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS , 1996 .

[4]  John M Mason,et al.  Operational and geometric evaluation of exclusive truck lanes , 1986 .

[5]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  THE POTENTIAL FOR FREIGHT PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG URBAN CORRIDORS , 1996 .

[6]  Nicholas Garber,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF LARGE-TRUCK CRASHES IN VIRGINIA , 1989 .

[7]  Deborah L Jasek,et al.  Guidelines for Truck Lane Restrictions in Texas , 1997 .

[8]  Christopher B. Winkler,et al.  Field Operational Test of the Freightliner/Meritor WABCO Roll Stability Advisor and Control at Praxair , 2002 .

[9]  Bruce N Janson,et al.  FEASIBILITY OF EXCLUSIVE FACILITIES FOR CARS AND TRUCKS. FINAL REPORT , 1990 .

[10]  P Samuel HOW TO "BUILD OUR WAY OUT OF CONGESTION". INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO EXPANDING URBAN HIGHWAY CAPACITY , 1999 .

[11]  Lance R Grenzeback,et al.  METHODS FOR REDUCING THE IMPACT OF LARGE TRUCKS ON URBAN PEAK PERIOD FREEWAY CONGESTION , 1989 .

[12]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  TRUCK RESTRICTION EVALUATION: THE PUGET SOUND EXPERIENCE , 1993 .

[13]  T D Gillespie,et al.  TRUCK OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS , 1997 .

[14]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  CASE STUDIES AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF TRUCK ACCIDENT COUNTERMEASURES ON URBAN FREEWAYS , 1994 .

[15]  C A O'flaherty TRANSPORT PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 4TH EDITION. CHAPTER 19: GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS , 1997 .

[16]  C F McDevitt BASICS OF CONCRETE BARRIERS , 2000 .

[17]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Truck characteristics for use in highway design and operation. Volume II, Appendices , 1990 .

[18]  L A Hoel,et al.  EXCLUSIVE LANES FOR TRUCKS AND PASSENGER VEHICLES ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS IN VIRGINIA: AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION , 1997 .

[19]  P Schonfeld,et al.  STATE-OF-THE-ART STUDIES/PRELIMINARY WORK SCOPES: IMPACTS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF FREEWAY TRUCK LANE RESTRICTIONS. FINAL REPORT , 1988 .

[20]  D Middleton A STUDY OF SELECTED WARNING DEVICES FOR REDUCING TRUCK SPEEDS. INTERIM REPORT , 1994 .

[21]  Nicholas J Garber,et al.  EFFECTS OF TRUCK STRATEGIES ON TRAFFIC FLOW AND SAFETY ON MULTILANE HIGHWAYS (ABRIDGMENT) , 1990 .

[22]  P M Cawley EVALUATION OF OVERHEIGHT VEHICLE DETECTION/WARNING SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[23]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  REVIEW OF TRUCK CHARACTERISTICS AS FACTORS IN ROADWAY DESIGN , 2003 .

[24]  W D Glauz,et al.  TRUCK CHARACTERISTICS FOR USE IN HIGHWAY DESIGN AND OPERATION. VOLUME II: APPENDIXES. FINAL REPORT , 1990 .

[25]  R W Stokes,et al.  TRUCK OPERATIONS AND REGULATIONS ON URBAN FREEWAYS , 1984 .

[26]  H W McGee,et al.  DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE FOR HIGHWAY DESIGN AND TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS , 1978 .

[27]  Herbert Miehsler,et al.  EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT , 1983 .

[28]  Cesar Quiroga,et al.  TRUCK ACCOMMODATION DESIGN GUIDANCE: FINAL REPORT , 2003 .

[29]  Martin Kroon,et al.  Freight transport and the environment , 1991 .

[30]  D H Weir,et al.  MEASURES OF THE LATERAL PLACEMENT OF PASSENGER CARS AND OTHER VEHICLES IN PROXIMITY TO INTERCITY BUSES ON 2 LANE AND MULTILANE HIGHWAYS , 1972 .

[31]  T. Jukes New Jersey Turnpike , 1980, Nature.

[32]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  AN OPERATIONAL EVALUATION OF TRUCK RESTRICTIONS ON SIX-LANE RURAL INTERSTATES IN TEXAS. FINAL RPEORT , 1990 .

[33]  Clyde E Lee,et al.  Truck Monitoring and Warning Systems for Freeway-to-Freeway Connections , 1999 .