Cognitive support embedded in self-regulated e-learning systems for students with special learning needs

This paper presents an anthropocentric approach in human – machine interaction in the area of self-regulated e-learning. In an attempt to enhance communication mediated through computers for pedagogical use we propose the incorporation of an intelligent emotional agent that is represented by a synthetic character with multimedia capabilities, modelled to imitate human behaviour. The agent is aiming to provide cognitive support to users with learning difficulties and attention disorders and is designed to accommodate self regulated learning elements. We review the basic principles of self regulated learning which, in turn, act as a basis for designing and implementing our system. Kolb’s learning cycle is used to provide a framework upon which agents’ pedagogical behaviour is constructed. A study between 24 students from higher education with learning difficulties and attention disorders is presented. The learning particularities of this special group that contradict with the principles of self regulated learning are reported. The study refers to students in higher education, in the domain of information technology. The analysis of results indicates that emotional agents improve communication between users of the particular learning group and learning environments by providing cognitive support through behavioural communication, compared to agents with neutral behaviour.

[1]  S. Beers,et al.  Processing speed and working memory performance in those with both ADHD and a reading disorder compared with those with ADHD alone. , 2011, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[2]  A. Bandura,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of the Role of Perceived Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning in Academic Continuance and Achievement. , 2008 .

[3]  Jack Mostow,et al.  Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: adding human-provided emotional scaffolding to an automated reading tutor that listens , 2002, Proceedings. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces.

[4]  Anthony Kaye,et al.  Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers , 2012 .

[5]  J. Fletcher.  Learning Disabilities : From Identification to Intervention , 2006 .

[6]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Emotion Research by the People, for the People , 2010 .

[7]  Mel Slater,et al.  Human Tails: Ownership and Control of Extended Humanoid Avatars , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community , 1998 .

[9]  Kathryn Howe.  Anthropomorphic Systems: An Approach for Categorization , 2009, HCI.

[10]  D. Forrest-Pressley,et al.  Metacognition, cognition, and human performance , 1985 .

[11]  R. Klassen.  Confidence to Manage Learning: The Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning of Early Adolescents with Learning Disabilities , 2010 .

[12]  Richard S. Newman,et al.  What Do I Need to Do to Succeed…When I Don't Understand What I'm Doing!?: Developmental Influences on Students' Adaptive Help Seeking , 2002 .

[13]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[14]  P. Pintrich.  A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students , 2004 .

[15]  David Kember,et al.  Beliefs about Knowledge and the Process of Teaching and Learning as a Factor in Adjusting to Study in Higher Education , 2001 .

[16]  J. McGillivray,et al.  Effects of Comorbid ADHD with Learning Disabilities on Anxiety, Depression, and Aggression in Adults , 2009, Journal of attention disorders.

[17]  Hiroshi Nakajima,et al.  We learn better together: enhancing eLearning with emotional characters , 2005, CSCL.

[18]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Gender-Specific Approaches to Developing Emotionally Intelligent Learning Companions , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[19]  Luis Carretié,et al.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: Neural correlates , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Building an Interactive Caring Agent for Students in Computer-based Learning Environments , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[21]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Development of achievement motivation. , 2007 .

[22]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[23]  M. Kenny,et al.  Comparing the Self-Concept of Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 2003, Journal of learning disabilities.

[24]  Russell Beale,et al.  Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Three pedagogical agent roles: Designing, developing, and validating agent as expert, motivator, and mentors , 2003 .

[26]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[27]  C. Walcott,et al.  The Relation Between Disinhibition and Emotion Regulation in Boys With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2004, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[28]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[29]  Martin Wessner,et al.  The CSCL community in its first decade: development, continuity, connectivity , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[30]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Modeling and Measuring Self-Regulated Learning in Teachable Agent Environments , 2010, AAAI Fall Symposium: Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems.

[31]  B. Wong.  CHAPTER 4 – Metacognition and Learning Disabilities , 1985 .

[32]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Evidence for Gender Specific Approaches to the Development of Emotionally Intelligent Learning , 2007 .

[33]  Ellen L. Usher,et al.  Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning , 2008 .

[34]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: problems and promises , 2011 .

[36]  Virginia M. C. Tze,et al.  Internalizing Problems of Adults With Learning Disabilities , 2013, Journal of learning disabilities.