Anticipated vs. Actual Synergy in Merger Partner Selection and Post-Merger Innovation

Past research has primarily focused on what happens after a merger. This research attempts to determine whether anticipated benefits from the merger actually accrue. We characterize the effects of observed variables on whether pairs of firms merge, vis-a-vis roommate matching, and then link these factors to post-merger innovation (i.e., number of patents). We jointly estimate the two models using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods with a unique panel data set of 1,979 mergers between 4,444 firms across industries and countries from 1992 to 2008. We find that similarity in national culture and technical knowledge has a positive effect on partner selection and post-merger innovation. Anticipated synergy from subindustry similarity, however, is not realized in post-merger innovation. Furthermore, some key synergy sources are unanticipated when selecting a merger partner. For example, financial synergy from higher total assets and complementarity in total assets and debt leverage as well as knowledge synergy from breadth and depth of knowledge positively influence innovation but not partner selection. Furthermore, factors that dilute synergy (e.g., higher debt levels) are unanticipated, and firms merge with firms that detract from their innovation potential. Overall, the results reveal some incongruity between anticipated and realized synergy.Data, as supplemental material, are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.0978 .

[1]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance , 1987 .

[2]  Jeffry Netter,et al.  What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions , 2002 .

[3]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Site Aggregation in a Random Utility Model of Recreation , 1992 .

[4]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  A Balance Model for Evaluating Firms for Acquisition , 1991 .

[5]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[6]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Financial Value of Brands in Mergers and Acquisitions: Is Value in the Eye of the Beholder? , 2008 .

[7]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Consumer Attitudes and Voluntary Rate Schedules for Public Utilities , 1987 .

[8]  Friedrich Trautwein,et al.  Merger Motives and Merger Prescriptions , 1990 .

[9]  J. Hulland,et al.  Value Creation following Merger and Acquisition Announcements: The Role of Strategic Emphasis Alignment , 2008 .

[10]  K. Ramaswamy.  The performance impact of strategic similarity in horizontal mergers: Evidence from the U.S. banking industry , 1997 .

[11]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: Toward a Conceptual Framework , 1999 .

[12]  Imran S. Currim,et al.  What Drives Managerial Use of Marketing and Financial Metrics and Does Metric Use Affect Performance of Marketing-Mix Activities? , 2013 .

[13]  L. Capron,et al.  Productivity enhancement at home via cross-border acquisitions: The roles of learning and contemporaneous domestic investments: Cross-Border Acquisitions and Domestic Productivity , 2015 .

[14]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Editorial: Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[15]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Do Innovations Really Payoff? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[16]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[17]  R. Veugelers,et al.  The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness , 2005 .

[18]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Quantifying Operational Synergies in a Merger/Acquisition , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Rajesh K. Chandy,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development , 2006 .

[20]  Isil Erel,et al.  Determinants of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011 .

[21]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries , 2006 .

[23]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Synergies and Post-Acquisition Performance: Differences versus Similarities in Resource Allocations , 1991 .

[24]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[25]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[26]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Global Takeoff of New Products: Culture, Wealth or Vanishing Differences? , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[27]  Albert B. Schwarzkopf,et al.  A study of innovation in the pesticide industry: Analysis of the innovation record of an industrial sector , 1987 .

[28]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Make, Buy, or Ally? Choice of and Payoff from Announcements of Alternate Strategies for Innovations , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[29]  L. Capron.  The long‐term performance of horizontal acquisitions , 1999 .

[30]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[31]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[32]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[33]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[34]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .

[35]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Value Maximization and the Acquisition Process , 1988 .

[36]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[37]  S. Viswanathan,et al.  Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence ☆ , 2005 .

[38]  Aloke Ghosh,et al.  Managerial Ownership, the Method of Payment for Acquisitions, and Executive Job Retention , 1998 .

[39]  W. Wong,et al.  The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .

[40]  L. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 1962 .

[41]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[42]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[43]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[45]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Managing innovation in the information age , 1994 .

[46]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[47]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[48]  G. Pisano.  Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[49]  H. Barkema,et al.  FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING , 1996 .

[50]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[51]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Effects Of Acquisitions on R&D Inputs and Outputs , 1991 .

[52]  Minjung Park,et al.  Understanding Merger Incentives and Outcomes in the US Mutual Fund Industry , 2013 .

[53]  Giovanni Valentini,et al.  Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality , 2012 .

[54]  Kai Li,et al.  Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions: Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[55]  John Geweke,et al.  Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 249 Using Simulation Methods for Bayesian Econometric Models: Inference, Development, and Communication , 2022 .

[56]  D. Petmezas,et al.  When It Pays to Pay Your Investment Banker: New Evidence on the Role of Financial Advisors in M&As , 2011 .

[57]  Does Corporate International Diversification Destroy Value? Evidence from Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions , 2008 .

[58]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Building an innovation base: exploring the role of acquisition behavior , 2013 .

[59]  G. Hult,et al.  Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance , 2001 .

[60]  P. Feather.  Valuing Food Store Access: Policy Implications for the Food Stamp Program , 2003 .

[61]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[62]  G. Karolyi,et al.  Regulatory Arbitrage and Cross-Border Bank Acquisitions: Regulatory Arbitrage and Cross-Border Bank Acquisitions , 2015 .

[63]  S. Chib,et al.  Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data , 1993 .

[64]  S. Dutta,et al.  Success in High-Technology Markets: is Marketing Capability Critical? , 1999 .

[65]  G. Tellis,et al.  Drivers of Success for Market Entry into China and India , 2007 .

[66]  F. Scherer,et al.  Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[67]  R. Chandy,et al.  Why some acquisitions do better than others : Product capital as a driver of long-term stock returns , 2007 .