A Markov model for performance evaluation of channel bonding in IEEE 802.11

Abstract The ever-growing popularity of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) in home, public, and work environments is fueling the need for WLANs that can accommodate more stations, each with higher throughput. This typically results in WLANs containing a larger number of heterogeneous devices, making the prediction of the network’s behavior and its efficient configuration an even more elaborate problem. In this paper, we propose a Markovian model that predicts the throughput achieved by each Access Point (AP) of the WLAN as a function of the network’s topology and the AP’s throughput demands. By means of simulation, we show that our model achieves mean relative errors of around 10% for networks of different sizes and with diverse node configurations. The model is adapted to the specification of IEEE 802.11 standards that implement channel bonding, namely 802.11n/ac/ax, and as such it can be used to provide insight into issues of channel assignment when using channel bonding. We derive guidelines on the best practice in static channel bonding given a performance metric and for different node characteristics such as the Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) indexes, frame aggregation rates, saturation levels, and network topologies. We then put our findings to the test by identifying the optimal channel bonding combination in an 802.11ac WLAN containing nodes with diverse characteristics. We conclude that the optimal solution is highly dependent on the particular network configuration. However, we find that, in general, larger channels are better suited for throughput maximization and smaller (and separate) channels render higher fairness.

[1]  Michele Garetto,et al.  Modeling per-flow throughput and capturing starvation in CSMA multi-hop wireless networks , 2008, TNET.

[2]  Thomas R. Gross,et al.  Evaluating 802.11ac features in indoor WLAN: an empirical study of performance and fairness , 2016, WiNTECH@MobiCom.

[3]  Patrick Thiran,et al.  Self-Organization Properties of CSMA/CA Systems and Their Consequences on Fairness , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Channel Bonding Based on Game Theory in Dense WLANs , 2019, 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN).

[5]  Jaume Barceló,et al.  On the Interactions Between Multiple Overlapping WLANs Using Channel Bonding , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Thomas Begin,et al.  Conflict graph-based model for IEEE 802.11 networks: A Divide-and-Conquer approach , 2019, Perform. Evaluation.

[7]  Evgeny Khorov,et al.  A Tutorial on IEEE 802.11ax High Efficiency WLANs , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Bruno Gaujal,et al.  Study of the impact of asymmetry and carrier sense mechanism in IEEE 802.11 multi-hops networks through a basic case , 2004, PE-WASUN '04.

[9]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  On the Performance of the Spatial Reuse Operation in IEEE 802.11ax WLANs , 2019, 2019 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN).

[10]  Nada Golmie,et al.  A Throughput Study for Channel Bonding in IEEE 802.11ac Networks , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Single Hop IEEE 802.11 DCF Analysis Revisited: Accurate Modeling of Channel Access Delay and Throughput for Saturated and Unsaturated Traffic Cases , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Evgeny Khorov,et al.  Current Status and Directions of IEEE 802.11be, the Future Wi-Fi 7 , 2020, IEEE Access.

[13]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Intelligent Channel Bonding in 802.11n WLANs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  Parth H. Pathak,et al.  A first look at 802.11ac in action: Energy efficiency and interference characterization , 2014, 2014 IFIP Networking Conference.

[15]  Cory C. Beard,et al.  Analytical models for understanding space, backoff, and flow correlation in CSMA wireless networks , 2012, Wireless Networks.

[16]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  WSN01-1: Frame Aggregation and Optimal Frame Size Adaptation for IEEE 802.11n WLANs , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[17]  Evgeny M. Khorov,et al.  Several EDCA parameter sets for improving channel access in IEEE 802.11ax networks , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[18]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  Dynamic Channel Bonding in Spatially Distributed High-Density WLANs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[19]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  To overlap or not to overlap: Enabling Channel Bonding in High Density WLANs , 2018, Comput. Networks.

[20]  Lili Qiu,et al.  Estimation of link interference in static multi-hop wireless networks , 2005, IMC '05.

[21]  Michelle X. Gong,et al.  Channel Bounding and MAC Protection Mechanisms for 802.11ac , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[22]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  The impact of channel bonding on 802.11n network management , 2011, CoNEXT '11.

[23]  Bruno Baynat,et al.  Performance analysis of multi-hop flows in IEEE 802.11 networks: A flexible and accurate modeling framework , 2016, Perform. Evaluation.

[24]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  Channel Bonding in Short-Range WLANs , 2014 .

[25]  Minyoung Park,et al.  IEEE 802.11ac: Dynamic Bandwidth Channel Access , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[26]  Carla-Fabiana Chiasserini,et al.  Cellular Network Traces Towards 5G: Usage, Analysis and Generation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[27]  Venkatesh Ramaiyan,et al.  Performance analysis of an IEEE 802.11ac WLAN with dynamic bandwidth channel access , 2016, 2016 Twenty Second National Conference on Communication (NCC).

[28]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  AP-initiated Multi-User Transmissions in IEEE 802.11ax WLANs , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[29]  Bang Chul Jung,et al.  Performance comparison of downlink user multiplexing schemes in IEEE 802.11ac: Multi-user MIMO vs. frame aggregation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[30]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Measurement-based study of the performance of IEEE 802.11ac in an indoor environment , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[31]  Katarzyna Kosek-Szott,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of IEEE 802.11 DCF heterogeneous traffic sources , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[32]  Zheng Chang,et al.  IEEE 802.11ac: Enhancements for very high throughput WLANs , 2011, 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[33]  Bertrand Ducourthial,et al.  Improving fairness between close Wi-Fi access points , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[34]  Saber Malekmohammadi,et al.  Parameterizing Enterprise WiFi Networks: The Use of Wide Channels , 2019 .

[35]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Measurement study of IEEE 802.11ac Wi-Fi performance in high density indoor deployments: Are wider channels always better? , 2017, 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM).

[36]  Yu Cheng,et al.  Performance Analysis of Opportunistic Channel Bonding in Multi-Channel WLANs , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[37]  Zhu Han,et al.  A Renewal Theory Based Analytical Model for Multi-Channel Random Access in IEEE 802.11ac/ax , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[38]  A. Kesselman,et al.  Performance analysis of A-MPDU and A-MSDU aggregation in IEEE 802.11n , 2007, 2007 IEEE Sarnoff Symposium.

[39]  Boris Bellalta,et al.  On the Performance of the Spatial Reuse Operation in IEEE 802.11ax WLANs , 2019, ArXiv.