On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host–Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations

We use thermodynamic integration (TI) and explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to estimate the absolute free energy of host–guest binding. In the unbound state, water molecules visit all of the internally accessible volume of the host, which is fully hydrated on all sides. Upon binding of an apolar guest, the toroidal host cavity is fully dehydrated; thus, during the intermediate λ stages along the integration, the hydration of the host fluctuates between hydrated and dehydrated states. Estimating free energies by TI can be especially challenging when there is a considerable difference in hydration between the two states of interest. We investigate these aspects using the popular TIP3P and TIP4P water models. TI free energy estimates through MD largely depend on water-related interactions, and water dynamics significantly affect the convergence of binding free energy calculations. Our results indicate that wetting/dewetting transitions play a major role in slowing the convergence of free energy estimation. We employ two alternative approaches—one analytical and the other empirically based on actual MD sampling—to correct for the standard state free energy. This correction is sizable (up to 4 kcal/mol), and the two approaches provide corrections that differ by about 1 kcal/mol. For the system considered here, the TIP4P water model combined with an analytical correction for the standard state free energy provides higher overall accuracy. This observation might be transferable to other systems in which water-related contributions dominate the binding process.

[1]  Lyle Isaacs,et al.  Toxicology and Drug Delivery by Cucurbit[n]uril Type Molecular Containers , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Khaleel I. Assaf,et al.  Molecular Dynamics of Methyl Viologen-Cucurbit(n)uril Complexes in Aqueous Solution , 2010 .

[3]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of cyclodextrin binding affinities: energy, entropy, and implications for drug design. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Yi Wang,et al.  Effects of Biomolecular Flexibility on Alchemical Calculations of Absolute Binding Free Energies. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Hydrophobic Association and Volume‐Confined Water Molecules , 2012 .

[6]  P. Kollman,et al.  A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char , 1993 .

[7]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Molecular binding: Under water's influence. , 2010, Nature chemistry.

[8]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[9]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[10]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  How Can Hydrophobic Association Be Enthalpy Driven? , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Standard free energy of releasing a localized water molecule from the binding pockets of proteins: double-decoupling method. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  J. Collins,et al.  Solubilisation and cytotoxicity of albendazole encapsulated in cucurbit[n]uril. , 2008, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[13]  R. Baron,et al.  Water in Cavity−Ligand Recognition , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  J. Kirkwood Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .

[15]  A. Kaifer,et al.  Complexation of ferrocene derivatives by the cucurbit[7]uril host: a comparative study of the cucurbituril and cyclodextrin host families. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  New ultrahigh affinity host-guest complexes of cucurbit[7]uril with bicyclo[2.2.2]octane and adamantane guests: thermodynamic analysis and evaluation of M2 affinity calculations. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  David L Mobley,et al.  Nonlinear scaling schemes for Lennard-Jones interactions in free energy calculations. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of Host-Guest Binding Affinities Using a Quantum-Mechanical Energy Model. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  Lyle Isaacs,et al.  Acyclic cucurbit[n]uril molecular containers enhance the solubility and bioactivity of poorly soluble pharmaceuticals , 2012, Nature Chemistry.

[20]  B. Berne,et al.  Dewetting transitions in protein cavities , 2010, Proteins.

[21]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  A synthetic host-guest system achieves avidin-biotin affinity by overcoming enthalpy–entropy compensation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Ignacio J General A Note on the Standard State's Binding Free Energy. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  T. Straatsma,et al.  Separation‐shifted scaling, a new scaling method for Lennard‐Jones interactions in thermodynamic integration , 1994 .

[25]  Young Ho Ko,et al.  Novel molecular drug carrier: encapsulation of oxaliplatin in cucurbit[7]uril and its effects on stability and reactivity of the drug. , 2005, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[26]  M. Gilson,et al.  The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Carlos Vega,et al.  Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[28]  Lingle Wang,et al.  Hydrophobic interactions in model enclosures from small to large length scales: non-additivity in explicit and implicit solvent models. , 2010, Faraday discussions.

[29]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  Lyle Isaacs,et al.  The cucurbit[n]uril family. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  B. Brooks,et al.  An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms , 1988 .

[32]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  Enhanced docking with the mining minima optimizer: Acceleration and side‐chain flexibility , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[33]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[34]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Host-guest complexes with protein-ligand-like affinities: computational analysis and design. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  Kremer,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[36]  Eunsung Lee,et al.  New Cucurbituril Homologues: Syntheses, Isolation, Characterization, and X-ray Crystal Structures of Cucurbit[n]uril (n = 5, 7, and 8) , 2000 .

[37]  Lingle Wang,et al.  Ligand binding to protein-binding pockets with wet and dry regions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  H. L. Hartley,et al.  Manuscript Preparation , 2022 .

[39]  P. Kollman,et al.  Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvation , 1993 .

[40]  Lyle Isaacs,et al.  The cucurbit[n]uril family: prime components for self-sorting systems. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.