Quantum Reversibility and a New Model of Quantum Automaton

Since a quantum computational system is a generalization of a classical computational system, its computational power should be greater or equal than that of the classical system. In spite of that the computational power of 1-way quantum finite automata has been shown to be smaller than that of their classical counterpart. I argue that this paradox lies on the ground that the currently accepted definition of quantum automaton neglects the concept of quantum reversibility. In this article I review the role that reversibility plays into quantum computing and I propose a new model of 1-way quantum finite automata whose computational power is at least equal to that of classical automata.

[1]  T. Toffoli,et al.  Conservative logic , 2002, Collision-Based Computing.

[2]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Logical reversibility of computation , 1973 .

[3]  John Watrous,et al.  On the power of quantum finite state automata , 1997, Proceedings 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[4]  Ming Li,et al.  Reversible Simulation of Irreversible Computation by Pebble Games , 1997, ArXiv.

[5]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Reversible Computing , 1980, ICALP.

[6]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations , 1998, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[7]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Quantum automata and quantum grammars , 2000, Theor. Comput. Sci..