Speed of response initiation in a time-to-contact discrimination task reflects the use of η

Avoiding collisions and making interceptions seem to require an organism to estimate the time that will elapse before an object will arrive to the point of observation (time-to-contact). The most outstanding account for precise timing has been the tau hypothesis. However, recent studies demonstrate that tau is not the only source of information in judging time-to-contact. By measuring reaction time in a time-to-contact discrimination task, we show that the eta function, which is a specific combination of optical size and rate of expansion, explains both accuracy and the observed RT pattern. The results conform to the hypothesis that the observers initiate the response when eta reaches a response threshold value.

[1]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field , 1995, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Pins,et al.  On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron’s law and choice reaction time , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  G. Laurent,et al.  Collision-avoidance: nature's many solutions , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  D. Ingle,et al.  Brain mechanisms and spatial vision , 1985 .

[8]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Gaston H. Gonnet,et al.  On the LambertW function , 1996, Adv. Comput. Math..

[10]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  B. Frost,et al.  Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  C Bonnet,et al.  The Piéron function in the threshold region , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  H. Whiting,et al.  Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Image Velocity, Not Tau, Explains Arrival-Time Judgments From Global Optical Flow , 1999 .

[15]  G. Laurent,et al.  Elementary Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field Visual Neuron , 1995, Science.

[16]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. Tresilian.  Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Perceiving visual expansion without optic flow , 2001, Nature.

[21]  E Brenner,et al.  Is Judging Time-to-Contact Based on ‘Tau’? , 1996, Perception.

[22]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  Michael F. Land.  Brain Mechanisms and Spatial Vision, David J. Ingle, Marc Jeannerod, David N. Lee (Eds.). Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1985), viii , 1985 .

[24]  R Gray,et al.  Attentional modulation of motion-in-depth processing , 2000, Vision Research.

[25]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[26]  Patricia R. Delucia,et al.  Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.