DETC 97 / DFM-4333 TOWARD HYBRID VARIANT / GENERATIVE PROCESS PLANNING

INTRODUCTION In process planning practice, variant techniques are the tools of choice: they currently support almost all practical implementations of computer-aided process planning. Several variant process planning systems are commercially available and have provided significant benefits—but despite the relative popularity of this approach, variant process planning has some well known drawbacks. A generative process planner that provides realistic process plans for a reasonably wide spectrum of products would make a great impact on industrial practice. Thus, a great deal of research has been done on generative approaches, and a number of experimental systems have been developed for various aspects of process planning. However, generative process planning has proved quite difficult. Most existing systems work only in restricted domains, and have not really achieved significant industrial use. This paper describes a hybrid process planning approach that we are developing. This approach attempts to combine the best characteristics of both variant and generative process planning while avoiding the worst limitations of each. As shown in Figure 1, our approach involves the following steps: • Create a database of designs a d process plans imilar to a variant database—but instead of using GT codes to index and classify the entries in the database, use detailed product design attributes that are more meaningful and accurate than GT codes and can be computed automatically from the designs stored in the database. • Given a new design for which a process plan is needed, retrieve relevant process planning information from the database—but unlike traditional variant process planning, this information is not a single plan but includes instead portions or “slices” of several plans, each of which is relevant for a different portion of the design. • Use generative plan-merging techniques to c mbine and modify the retrieved plan slices in order to synthesize a process plan for the new design. This paper describes the basic approach we are developing for each of these steps. Some of the steps are implemented and working, and some of them are still work in progress.

[1]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Towards multiprocessor feature recognition , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  John S. Baras,et al.  Integrating Tradeoff Analysis and Plan-Based Evaluation of Designs for Microwave Modules , 1996 .

[3]  M. J. Wozny,et al.  Topics In Feature-Based Design And Manufacturing , 1994 .

[4]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Machine Understanding of CSG: Extraction and Unification of Manufacturing Features , 1987, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[5]  Stelios Kafandaris,et al.  Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing , 1990 .

[6]  James A. Hendler,et al.  MERGING SEPARATELY GENERATED PLANS WITH RESTRICTED INTERACTIONS , 1992, Comput. Intell..

[7]  Subbarao Kambhampati,et al.  Integrating general purpose planners and specialized reasoners: case study of a hybrid planning architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Mark Henderson,et al.  Automated Group Technology Part Coding From a Three-Dimensional CAD Database , 1988 .

[9]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  A Methodology For Systematic Generation And Evaluation Of Alternative Operation Plans , 1994 .

[11]  Richard H. Crawford,et al.  Automatic Part Coding Based on Interfeature Relationships , 1994 .

[12]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Group technology classification from feature-based geometric models , 1989 .

[13]  Dana S. Nau,et al.  Feature-based similarity assessment of solid models , 1997, SMA '97.

[14]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Generating redesign suggestions to reduce setup cost: a step towards automated redesign , 1996, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  Rakesh Nagi,et al.  Identification of similar parts in agile manufacturing , 1994 .

[16]  J. Britanik,et al.  Case-based process planning with hierarchical plan merging , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[17]  I. Minis,et al.  Applications of group technology in distributed manufacturing , 1996, J. Intell. Manuf..

[18]  Yong Yue,et al.  Validation, Workpiece Selection and Clamping of Complex 2.5D Components , 1994 .

[19]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Explanation-based learning for intelligent process planning , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[20]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Computer-Aided Process Planning: The Present and the Future , 1988 .

[21]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Extracting alternative machining features: An algorithmic approach , 1995 .