Component and system evaluation for the development of a handheld point-of-care spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) device

Recently, digital photography has become an efficient and economic method to assist dermatologists in monitoring skin characteristics. Although this technology has advanced a great deal in resolution and costs, conventional digital cameras continue to only provide qualitative recording of color information. To address this issue, we are developing a compact, quantitative skin imaging camera by employing spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI), a non-contact approach for determining tissue optical properties over a wide field-of-view. SFDI uses knowledge of optical properties at multiple wavelengths to recover concentrations of tissue constituents such as oxy/deoxy-hemoglobin, water, and melanin. This method has been well researched and presented in laboratory and research settings. The next step in the development of SFDI systems is to make typical systems compact and cheaper using commercial components. We present our findings by performing a component-by-component analysis of key SFDI system components including light sources, projectors, and cameras.

[1]  Robert J Goldman,et al.  More than One Way to Measure a Wound: An Overview of Tools and Techniques , 2002, Advances in skin & wound care.

[2]  Bernard Choi,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of burn wound severity using optical technology: a review of current and future modalities. , 2011, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[3]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Postoperative Quantitative Assessment of Reconstructive Tissue Status in a Cutaneous Flap Model Using Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Modulated imaging: quantitative analysis and tomography of turbid media in the spatial-frequency domain. , 2005, Optics letters.

[5]  Bernard Choi,et al.  Implementation of an LED-based clinical spatial frequency domain imaging system , 2012, Other Conferences.

[6]  Sylvain Gioux,et al.  Wavelength optimization for rapid chromophore mapping using spatial frequency domain imaging. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  C. V. Vander Kolk,et al.  Standardizing digital photography: it's not all in the eye of the beholder. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  B. Thiers,et al.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting , 2009 .

[9]  David Hsiang,et al.  Effects of motion on optical properties in the spatial frequency domain. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  T. Wilson,et al.  Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope. , 1997, Optics letters.

[11]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Spatial frequency domain imaging of port wine stain biochemical composition in response to laser therapy: A pilot study , 2012, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[12]  Rolf B. Saager,et al.  Multilayer silicone phantoms for the evaluation of quantitative optical techniques in skin imaging , 2010, BiOS.

[13]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Wide‐field spatial mapping of in vivo tattoo skin optical properties using modulated imaging , 2009, Lasers in surgery and medicine.