Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. A review in 3 parts. Part 3: in vitro tests of adhesive systems.

In the third part of this review of laboratory testing, methods of testing adhesive systems are evaluated. Test set-ups that are used to analyze the restorative material in combination with the adhesive system are presented. Currently, there is no standardized protocol available for the evaluation of adhesives. This complicates any direct comparisons of values between different testing institutes. Therefore, the statistically evaluated ranking of the different adhesives is more important than mean values. Depending on the testing institute, a correlation between bond strength measurements and clinical outcomes may exist. Qualitative analysis of adhesive/tooth interaction can help explain the functioning of a system, but the depth of penetration of the adhesive cannot predict bond strength. Indirect bond measurements or analyses of the interactions of adhesive and composite materials, such as dye penetration or marginal analysis, do not correlate or correlate only partially with clinical findings. Adhesive systems should be tested in vitro and compared to a well-known standard adhesive before they are used in the clinic. Water storage of specimens for several months before testing increases the predictability of the bonding performance of the tested adhesive.

[1]  J. V. van Dijken,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of a low-shrinkage resin composite: a five-year evaluation. , 2009, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[2]  S. Heintze,et al.  Interdental mutans streptococci suppression in vivo: a comparison of different chlorhexidine regimens in relation to restorative material. , 2002, American journal of dentistry.

[3]  Roland Frankenberger,et al.  Light curing of resin-based composites in the LED era. , 2008, American journal of dentistry.

[4]  A. Loguércio,et al.  Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[5]  M. Brackett,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[6]  R. Hickel,et al.  Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities. , 2006, Dental materials journal.

[7]  A. Harrison,et al.  Determination of doughing and manipulation times of acrylic resin denture base material and a proposal for a specification for a packing plasticity test. , 1992, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  M. Tyas,et al.  The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  E. Asmussen.  Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[10]  A. Fok,et al.  Multiple correlations of material parameters of light-cured dental composites. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[12]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Resin-dentin shear bond strength and interfacial ultrastructure with and without a hybrid layer. , 1997, Operative dentistry.

[13]  Antheunis Versluis,et al.  Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  N. Moszner,et al.  Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[15]  V. Rousson,et al.  Wear of two artificial tooth materials in vivo: a 12-month pilot study. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[17]  In-bog Lee,et al.  Rheological characterization of composites using a vertical oscillation rheometer , 2004 .

[18]  John M Powers,et al.  Fluorescence of layered resin composites. , 2005, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[19]  C. Garvan,et al.  A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. , 2009, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[20]  G. Zappini,et al.  The relationship between physical parameters and wear of dental composites , 2007 .

[21]  J. McCabe,et al.  Hygroscopic expansion of resin based composites during 6 months of water storage , 1994, British Dental Journal.

[22]  F. Tay,et al.  Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. , 1996, American journal of dentistry.

[23]  R. Hickel,et al.  Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[25]  D. Sarrett,et al.  The effect of water on polymer matrix and composite wear. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  Rasmusson Cg,et al.  Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. , 1995 .

[27]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  S. Heintze,et al.  Retention loss of class v restorations after artificial aging. , 2010, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[29]  G. Willems,et al.  Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods. , 2001, European journal of oral sciences.

[30]  V. Rousson,et al.  Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[31]  V. Rousson,et al.  The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading. , 2005, Journal of Adhesive Dentistry.

[32]  C. Chew,et al.  Marginal gap formation of composites in dentine: effect of water storage. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[33]  P. Gaengler,et al.  Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report. , 2004, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[34]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[35]  S D Heintze,et al.  Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[36]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Concise Review Biomaterials & Bioengineering: Meta-analytical Review of Factors Involved in Dentin Adherence , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[37]  U. Glendor.  Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries--a 12 year review of the literature. , 2008, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[38]  W. Sperr,et al.  Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[39]  K J Anusavice,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[40]  L. Baratieri,et al.  Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. , 2001, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[41]  Wolfgang Jacquet,et al.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results. , 2007 .

[42]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Microtensile Specimen Attachment and Shape—Finite Element Analysis , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[43]  I. Mjör,et al.  Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/ self-etching restorative system: three-year findings. , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[44]  F. Lobbezoo,et al.  No association between incisal tooth wear and temporomandibular disorders. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[45]  J. Roulet.  Marginal integrity: clinical significance. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[46]  L. Vaz,et al.  The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[47]  J. Meyer,et al.  Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[48]  T. Stolarski,et al.  Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[49]  M. Toledano,et al.  Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[50]  J. McCabe,et al.  Two-and three-body wear of dental restorative materials , 2002 .

[51]  S. Heintze,et al.  Retention of restorations placed in noncarious cervical lesions after centric and eccentric occlusal loading in a chewing simulator--A pilot study. , 2006, Journal of Adhesive Dentistry.

[52]  P. Martus,et al.  Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[53]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[54]  U. Blunck,et al.  Marginal adaptation of compomer Class V restorations in vitro. , 1999, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[55]  A. Mine,et al.  Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[56]  V. Rousson,et al.  Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[57]  C. Goracci,et al.  Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimens' structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[58]  Y. Momoi,et al.  10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[59]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[60]  U. Lohbauer,et al.  The effect of resin composite pre-heating on monomer conversion and polymerization shrinkage. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[61]  S D Heintze,et al.  Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[62]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[63]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[64]  S. Heintze.  How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[65]  V. Rousson,et al.  Pooling of dentin microtensile bond strength data improves clinical correlation. , 2011, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[66]  N. Opdam,et al.  Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[67]  A. Herrero,et al.  Comparison of shear bond strength relative to two testing devices. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[68]  D. Pashley,et al.  The microtensile bond test: a review. , 1999, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[69]  P. Bush,et al.  A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[70]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin , 2008, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[71]  S. Heintze,et al.  Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers--comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[72]  L. Walsh,et al.  Depth of cure and surface microhardness of composite resin cured with blue LED curing lights. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[73]  M. Huysmans,et al.  The influence of simulated clinical handling on the flexural and compressive strength of posterior composite restorative materials. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[74]  D. Sarrett.  Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[75]  I. Mjör.  Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[76]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[77]  G Willems,et al.  Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[78]  Yasuaki Hotta,et al.  Examination of composite resins with electron microscopy, microhardness tester and energy dispersive X-ray microanalyzer. , 2009, Dental materials journal.

[79]  P. Zaslansky,et al.  Effectiveness of all-in-one adhesive systems tested by thermocycling following short and long-term water storage. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[80]  R. H. Roydhouse.  Punch-Shear Test for Dental Purposes , 1970, Journal of dental research.

[81]  U. John,et al.  Risk factors for high occlusal wear scores in a population-based sample: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[82]  J D Rugh,et al.  Association of Salivary Flow Rates with Maximal Bite Force , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[83]  P. Gaengler,et al.  Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[84]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Critical analysis of the influence of different parameters on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[85]  A. Domb,et al.  Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[86]  J. Bader,et al.  The consequences of not replacing a missing posterior tooth. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[87]  N. Opdam,et al.  Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[88]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  A pilot study of a simple photon migration model for predicting depth of cure in dental composite. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[89]  C F Cox,et al.  Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. , 1982, Journal of oral pathology.

[90]  J F Roulet,et al.  Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. , 1989, Scanning microscopy.

[91]  I. Mjör,et al.  Bonding of all-porcelain crowns: structural characteristics of the substrate. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[92]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. , 2003, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[93]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[94]  I. Mjör,et al.  A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[95]  V. Tserki,et al.  Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[96]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[97]  K. Asaoka,et al.  Diffusion coefficient of water through dental composite resin. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[98]  E. Piva,et al.  Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[99]  M. Toledano,et al.  Sorption and solubility testing of orthodontic bonding cements in different solutions. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[100]  G. Ryge,et al.  Reprint of Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[101]  J. V. van Dijken,et al.  Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite , 1998, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[102]  M. Bakke,et al.  Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution , 2001, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[103]  M. O. Ahlers,et al.  Depth of cure of LED vs QTH light-curing devices at a distance of 7 mm. , 2004, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[104]  P. Odman,et al.  A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[105]  A. Lussi,et al.  Erosion—diagnosis and risk factors , 2008, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[106]  F. Tay,et al.  Durability of resin-dentin bonds related to water and oil storage. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[107]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites. , 2004, Quintessence international.

[108]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. , 1999, Operative dentistry.

[109]  E. Kidd,et al.  Prediction of Secondary Caries around Tooth-colored Restorations: A Clinical and Microbiological Study , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[110]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[111]  F Toffenetti,et al.  Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. , 2000, Quintessence international.

[112]  F. Demarco,et al.  Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[113]  G. Eckert,et al.  A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[114]  D. Watts,et al.  Dimensional changes of resin/ionomer restoratives in aqueous and neutral media. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[115]  J. Dennison,et al.  A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. , 1996, Operative dentistry.

[116]  J. Tagami,et al.  Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. , 2007, Dental materials journal.

[117]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[118]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years , 2001, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[119]  J. Roulet,et al.  The effects of thermocycling on the flexural strength and flexural modulus of modern resin-based filling materials. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[120]  C. N. Brooks,et al.  Clinical performance evaluation of a packable posterior composite in bulk-cured restorations. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[121]  R Hickel,et al.  A New Optical 3-D Device for the Detection of Wear , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[122]  Yong-Keun Lee,et al.  Changes in opalescence and fluorescence properties of resin composites after accelerated aging. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[123]  Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. , 2005 .

[124]  P. Pallav,et al.  Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[125]  J. V. Dijken.  Three-year performance of a calcium-, fluoride-, and hydroxyl-ions-releasing resin composite , 2002 .

[126]  T. Araki,et al.  Autofluorescence in human dentine in relation to age, tooth type and temperature measured by nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence microscopy. , 1999, Archives of oral biology.

[127]  S. Heintze,et al.  Automatic gap detection at restoration margins with an optical sensor in vitro. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[128]  M. Brännström.  Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. , 1992, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia.

[129]  Stephen Bayne,et al.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[130]  D C Watts,et al.  Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[131]  D. Pashley,et al.  Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[132]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etching adhesives in posterior restorations. , 2009, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[133]  R. MATTOS-GRANER,et al.  Analyses of biofilms accumulated on dental restorative materials. , 2009, American journal of dentistry.

[134]  R. Genco,et al.  Current View of Risk Factors for Periodontal Diseases. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[135]  J. Powers,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. , 2005, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[136]  Brown Wd,et al.  A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. , 1996 .

[137]  S. Heintze,et al.  Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[138]  S L Yankell,et al.  New studies on estimated and actual toothbrushing times and dentifrice use. , 1998, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[139]  J. W. Curtis,et al.  Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. , 1994, Operative dentistry.

[140]  Yong-Keun Lee,et al.  Translucency of varied brand and shade of resin composites. , 2008, American journal of dentistry.

[141]  R. Hickel,et al.  Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[142]  G Ryge,et al.  Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[143]  P. Cesar,et al.  Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[144]  V. Rousson,et al.  A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[145]  O. Bernhardt,et al.  Association of malocclusion and functional occlusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. , 2004, Quintessence international.

[146]  J. Dunn.  Direct composites in a contemporary restorative practice. , 1998, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[147]  B. Hugo,et al.  Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[148]  V. Rousson,et al.  Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[149]  A. Tveit,et al.  Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[150]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Predictors of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: a 20-year follow-up study from childhood to adulthood , 2002, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[151]  E. Swift,et al.  2-year Clinical evaluation of sodium hypochlorite treatment in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a pilot study. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[152]  I. Mjör.  Minimum requirements for new dental materials. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[153]  M. Tyas.  Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in Class IV cavities. , 1990, Australian dental journal.

[154]  S. Paris,et al.  Improved Resin Infiltration of Natural Caries Lesions , 2008, Journal of dentistry research.

[155]  C. S. Jones,et al.  The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[156]  W. Solberg,et al.  The Prevalence of Dental Attrition and its Association with Factors of Age, Gender, Occlusion, and TMJ Symptomatology , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[157]  Yong-Keun Lee,et al.  Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[158]  J. Bader,et al.  Movement of Teeth Adjacent to Posterior Bounded Edentulous Spaces , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[159]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.