Extensions to the Concept of Excess Commuting

When people commute to work longer or farther than the actual spatial arrangement of homes and workplaces suggest they could be commuting, people are engaging in excess commuting. In the aggregate, excess commuting is the nonoptimal or surplus work travel occurring in cities because people do not minimize their journeys to work. In this paper an alternative view of excess commuting based on a theoretical maximum commute is presented. The calculation of a theoretical maximum commute allows for an analysis of the range between the theoretical minimum and maximum commutes, which marks an improvement over current approaches to the measure of excess commuting. Conceptually, this range is taken to be the commuting capacity of a city. To what extent commuting capacity is consumed in terms of current levels of commuting forms a primary question of the analysis. A model is formulated and applied to 1990 Census data for a sample of US cities. Numerical and visual results suggest variation in the amount of excess commuting and consumed commuting potential for the sample of cities. The results also suggest a relationship between the jobs – housing balance of a city (as captured by its theoretical minimum commute) and its observed commute. Additionally, the maximization calculation is shown to provide insight into the degree of decentralized urban form. A conclusion is provided which relates the findings of this research to larger issues of urban sustainability.

[1]  F. L. Hitchcock The Distribution of a Product from Several Sources to Numerous Localities , 1941 .

[2]  Benjamin H. Stevens,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY IN URBAN AREAS. , 1960 .

[3]  John R Hamburg,et al.  LINEAR PROGRAMMING TEST OF JOURNEY-TO-WORK MINIMIZATION , 1965 .

[4]  Alan Wilson,et al.  A statistical theory of spatial distribution models , 1967 .

[5]  Alan Wilson Urban and regional models in geography and planning , 1974 .

[6]  D. Griffith,et al.  Explorations into the Relationship between Spatial Structure and Spatial Interaction , 1980 .

[7]  Bruce W. Hamilton,et al.  Wasteful Commuting , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey , 1989 .

[9]  M. White Urban Commuting Journeys Are Not "Wasteful" , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  Spatial Interaction Models:Formulations and Applications , 1988 .

[11]  Bruce W. Hamilton,et al.  Wasteful Commuting Again , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  R. Cervero Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility , 1989 .

[13]  Seoung Hwan Suh,et al.  Wasteful commuting: An alternative approach , 1990 .

[14]  Anthony M. J. Yezer,et al.  Testing the Monocentric Urban Model: Evidence Based on Wasteful Commuting , 1991 .

[15]  G. Giuliano Is Jobs-Housing Balance a Transportation Issue? , 1991 .

[16]  Maureen L. Cropper,et al.  Wasteful commuting: A re-examination , 1991 .

[17]  K. Small,et al.  "Wasteful" Commuting: A Resolution , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Seyoung Kim AFTER THE RESOLUTION: EXCESS COMMUTING FOR TWO-WORKER HOUSEHOLDS IN THE LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN AREA , 1993 .

[19]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure? , 1993 .

[20]  James A. Pooler,et al.  Structural Spatial Interaction , 1993 .

[21]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Market Solutions for Sustainable Cities , 1995 .

[22]  Tsutomu Suzuki,et al.  Excess Commuting in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area: Measurement and Policy Simulations , 1995 .

[23]  Farhad Atash Reorienting metropolitan land use and transportation policies in the USA , 1996 .

[24]  Michael Breheny,et al.  Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable? , 1997 .

[25]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  Impacts of commuting efficiency on congestion and emissions: case of the Hamilton CMA, Canada , 1997 .

[26]  William R. Black,et al.  North American transportation: perspectives on research needs and sustainable transportation , 1997 .

[27]  David L. Phillips,et al.  The post-suburban era comes to Richmond: city decline, suburban transition, and exurban growth , 1997 .

[28]  D. Levinson Accessibility and the Journey to Work , 1998 .

[29]  Ann Verhetsel THE IMPACT OF SPATIAL VERSUS ECONOMIC MEASURES IN AN URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 1 Reprints: University of Antwerp – UFSIA – Faculty of Economics Prinsstraat 13 B-2000 Antwerp. 1 , 1998 .

[30]  Nigel Spence,et al.  Excess or wasteful commuting in a selection of British cities , 1998 .

[31]  A. Helling,et al.  Changing intra-metropolitan accessibility in the U.S.: Evidence from Atlanta , 1998 .

[32]  M. Kwan Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures , 1999 .

[33]  Simon Shepherd,et al.  Optimal transport strategies for European cities , 2000 .

[34]  Lance Freeman,et al.  The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties: An Explanatory Analysis , 2001 .

[35]  Fahui Wang Explaining Intraurban Variations of Commuting by Job Proximity and Workers' Characteristics , 2001 .

[36]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Excess Commuting and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2002 .

[37]  W. Clark,et al.  Black and White Commuting Behavior in a Large Segregated City: Evidence from Atlanta , 2003 .