Multidimensional Encoding Strategy of Spiking Neurons

Neural responses in sensory systems are typically triggered by a multitude of stimulus features. Using information theory, we study the encoding accuracy of a population of stochastically spiking neurons characterized by different tuning widths for the different features. The optimal encoding strategy for representing one feature most accurately consists of narrow tuning in the dimension to be encoded, to increase the single-neuron Fisher information, and broad tuning in all other dimensions, to increase the number of active neurons. Extremely narrow tuning without sufficient receptive field overlap will severely worsen the coding. This implies the existence of an optimal tuning width for the feature to be encoded. Empirically, only a subset of all stimulus features will normally be accessible. In this case, relative encoding errors can be calculated that yield a criterion for the function of a neural population based on the measured tuning curves.

[1]  G. Deco,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Approach to Neural Computing , 1997, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[2]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[4]  H B Barlow,et al.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[5]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Mutual Information, Fisher Information, and Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[6]  Herman P. Snippe,et al.  Parameter Extraction from Population Codes: A Critical Assessment , 1996, Neural Computation.

[7]  Helmut Schwegler,et al.  Coarse coding: calculation of the resolution achieved by a population of large receptive field neurons , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Sander M. Bohte,et al.  Unsupervised clustering with spiking neurons by sparse temporal coding and multilayer RBF networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[9]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Interpreting neuronal population activity by reconstruction: unified framework with application to hippocampal place cells. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[12]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Accuracy and learning in neuronal populations. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[14]  J. B. Kernan,et al.  An Information‐Theoretic Approach* , 1971 .

[15]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[16]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[17]  W. Pitts,et al.  What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[18]  A K Kreiter,et al.  Synchronization and assembly formation in the visual cortex. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[19]  Sander M. Bohte,et al.  Error-backpropagation in temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons , 2000, Neurocomputing.

[20]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Corresponding , 1994 .