Monetary Incentives for Low-Stakes Tests

This research attempted to discover the degree to which performance on assessments that have no direct consequences for individual students can be attributed to students' motivational states in addition to their underlying achievement in the domains measured. If such findings were reliable, it would allow us to correct underestimates of domain performance due to lack of motivation. Such corrections would be extremely interesting in explaining differential subgroup performance in state or national assessments that have institutional but not individual consequences. Recent information on international assessments (e.g., the Third International Mathematics and Science Study [TIMSS]) indicates that 12th-grade students in the United States are doing poorly on such assessments compared with their peers in other countries. These poor results are usually attributed to cognitive factors such as students' opportunities to learn, etc. However, a partial explanation may be motivational. Because the low-stakes tests were administered in these 12th-graders' final year in high school, this timing may have negatively affected motivation, and thus performance. Using TIMSS released math items, we provided $10.00 per item correct so as to increase a motivational effect and thus increase performance. However, the monetary incentive was not effective in improving performance.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Alison H. Paris,et al.  Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning , 2001 .

[3]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[4]  P. Pintrich.  Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. , 2000 .

[5]  Patrick Gonzales,et al.  Pursuing Excellence: A Study of U.S. Twelfth-Grade Mathematics and Science Achievement in International Context. Initial Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. , 1997 .

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[7]  Jenny C. Kao,et al.  English Language Learners and Math Achievement: A Study of Opportunity to Learn and Language Accommodation. Technical Report 702. , 2006 .

[8]  W. McKeachie,et al.  The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire , 2005 .

[9]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[10]  J. Abedi.  Standardized Achievement Tests and English Language Learners: Psychometrics Issues , 2002 .

[11]  B. Lazerick.  Third international mathematics and science study , 1997 .

[12]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[13]  C. Wolters,et al.  Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning , 2003 .

[14]  Jürgen Baumert,et al.  Test motivation in the assessment of student skills: The effects of incentives on motivation and performance , 2001 .

[15]  I-Lin Gloria Hsieh,et al.  Types of feedback in a computer-based collaborative problem-solving group task , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  H. O'Neil,et al.  Ethnicity, Effort, Self-Efficacy, Worry, and Statistics Achievement in Malaysia: A Construct Validation of the State-Trait Motivation Model , 2002 .

[17]  Dana L. Kelly,et al.  International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement , 1998 .

[18]  E. S. Smoller.  I Can't Remember , 1997 .

[19]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Turning Research Into Results: A Guide to Selecting the Right Performance Solutions , 2002 .

[20]  J. Abedi.  The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues , 2004 .

[21]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[22]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model , 2001 .

[23]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. , 1994 .

[24]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Self‐regulation, goal orientation, self‐efficacy, worry, and high‐stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students 1 , 2 , 1999 .

[25]  D. Schunk.  Self-Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich , 2005 .

[26]  Jamal Abedi,et al.  Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment , 1996 .

[27]  Los Angeles,et al.  on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, , 1991 .

[28]  Michael O. Martin.  TIMSS 1999 international science report : Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade , 2000 .

[29]  I. Mullis.  TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report : Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade , 2000 .

[30]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[31]  H. O'Neil,et al.  Effects of expertise on state self-efficacy and state worry during a computer-based certification test☆ , 1999 .

[32]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[33]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Effects of Motivational Interventions on the National Assessment of Educational Progress Mathematics Performance , 1995 .

[34]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  H. O'Neil,et al.  The effects of test item format on self-efficacy and worry during a high-stakes computer-based certification examination , 1999 .