Numerical Estimation of the Degree of Reservoir Permeability Heterogeneity Using Pressure Drawdown Tests

This study aims to correlate the response of pressure transient test to permeability distribution type. For this purpose, correlated permeability distributions in x–y direction are generated using fractional Brownian motion (fBm) as it has been shown in literature that permeability in carbonate reservoirs exhibits an fBm type distribution horizontally. 2-D fBm permeability distributions created using mid point displacement method are employed as data to a black oil simulator. The intermittence exponent, H or fractal dimension of the distribution, D, as defined by D=2 − H, characterizes the distribution type. All permeability distributions are normalized to represent the same arithmetic mean (20, 100, and 500 mD) and uniform variance so that only their fractal dimension that underlies the smoothness of the distribution distinguishes them. Many different realizations of permeability distributions are generated based on the random number seeds used and pressure transient (drawdown) tests are simulated using a black oil simulator package (ECLIPSE 100). Pressure transient analysis is performed using PanSystem package. As a base case and for the comparison purpose, the same procedure is repeated for the totally homogeneous case (the same permeability for all grids) and a random (normally distributed) permeability distribution with the same mean and uniform variance. The effects of permeability distribution type on the pressure response are clarified. A strong impact of heterogeneity is observed as an increase in skin effect with increasing fractal dimension of permeability distribution. This additional (or pseudo) skin effect due to heterogeneity is correlated to the fractal dimension of the permeability distribution. As a further step, the procedure is repeated for different flow rates applied during the drawdown test. The correlation between the fractal dimension of permeability distribution and additional skin is improved by incorporating the rate into it. The methodology followed can be used in the assessment of reservoir heterogeneity quantitatively using pressure transient response.

[1]  Steve Begg,et al.  Characterizing the Effects of Heterogeneity on Oil Recovery by Dry Gas Injection , 1992 .

[2]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Determination of Reservoir Permeability Distributions From Pressure Buildup Data , 1993 .

[3]  Dean S. Oliver.  Estimation of radial permeability distribution from well-test data , 1992 .

[4]  S. K. Yadavalli,et al.  Use of Pressure Transient Data to Estimate Permeability Variograms , 1995 .

[5]  George Stewart,et al.  A method for using the naturally-occurring negative geoskin in the description of fluvial reservoirs , 1996 .

[6]  Vertical versus Horizontal Well Log Variability and Application to Fractal Reservoir Modeling , 1995 .

[7]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Integrating field production history in stochastic reservoir characterization , 1997 .

[8]  R. Voss.  Random Fractal Forgeries , 1985 .

[9]  A. Journel,et al.  Integrating Well Test--Derived Effective Absolute Permeabilities in Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling , 1994 .

[10]  Effect of fractal permeability correlations on waterflooding performance in carbonate reservoirs , 1999 .

[11]  F. G. Alabert.  Constraining Description of Randomly Heterogeneous Reservoirs to Pressure Test Data: A Monte Carlo Study , 1989 .

[12]  Y. Yortsos,et al.  Practical Application of Fractal Pressure Transient Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs , 1995 .

[13]  Leif Larsen,et al.  Determination of Skin Factors and Flow Capacities of Individual Layers in Two-Layered Reservoirs , 1982 .

[14]  T. Hewett.  Fractal Distributions of Reservoir Heterogeneity and Their Influence on Fluid Transport , 1986 .

[15]  Thomas A. Hewett,et al.  Conditional Simulation of Reservoir Heterogeneity With Fractals , 1990 .

[16]  A. S. Emanuel,et al.  Reservoir performance prediction methods based on fractal geostatistics , 1989 .

[17]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  An Approximate Model for the Productivity of Non-Conventional Wells in Heterogeneous Reservoirs , 1999 .

[18]  A. K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of Fractal Models To Describe Reservoir Heterogeneity and Performance , 1997 .

[19]  D. Saupe.  Algorithms for random fractals , 1988 .

[20]  Y. Yortsos,et al.  Pressure Transient Analysis of Fractal Reservoirs , 1990 .

[21]  Mohan Kelkar,et al.  Conditional Simulation Method for Reservoir Description Using Spatial and Well-Performance Constraints , 1994 .

[22]  Mohan Kelkar,et al.  Reservoir Description by Integration of Well Test Data and Spatial Statistics , 1995 .

[23]  K. B. Hird,et al.  Quantification of reservoir connectivity for reservoir description applications , 1998 .

[24]  Peter S. Hegeman,et al.  A Field Application of Multiple-Well Testing for Reservoir Characterization , 1995 .

[25]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  Reservoir Description by Well Test Analysis Using Cyclic Flow Rate Variation , 1997 .

[26]  Fractal distributions of reservoir properties and their use in reservoir simulation , 1994 .

[27]  Murray,et al.  Use of transient testing in reservoir management , 1995 .