Quality of Grasping and the Role of Haptics in a 3-D Immersive Virtual Reality Environment in Individuals With Stroke

Reaching and grasping parameters with and without haptic feedback were characterized in people with chronic post-stroke behaviors. Twelve (67 ±10 years) individuals with chronic stroke and arm/hand paresis (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Arm: ≥46/66 pts) participated. Three dimensional (3-D) temporal and spatial kinematics of reaching and grasping movements to three objects (can: cylindrical grasp; screwdriver: power grasp; pen: precision grasp) in a physical environment (PE) with and without additional haptic feedback and a 3-D virtual environment (VE) with haptic feedback were recorded. Participants reached, grasped and transported physical and virtual objects using similar movement strategies in all conditions. Reaches made in VE were less smooth and slower compared to the PE. Arm and trunk kinematics were similar in both environments and glove conditions. For grasping, stroke subjects preserved aperture scaling to object size but used wider hand apertures with longer delays between times to maximal reaching velocity and maximal grasping aperture. Wearing the glove decreased reaching velocity. Our results in a small group of subjects suggest that providing haptic information in the VE did not affect the validity of reaching and grasping movement. Small disparities in movement parameters between environments may be due to differences in perception of object distance in VE. Reach-to-grasp kinematics to smaller objects may be improved by better 3-D rendering. Comparable kinematics between environments and conditions is encouraging for the incorporation of high quality VEs in rehabilitation programs aimed at improving upper limb recovery.

[1]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimensional environment in healthy and stroke subjects. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Soha Saleh,et al.  Robots integrated with virtual reality simulations for customized motor training in a person with upper extremity hemiparesis: a case study. , 2012, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[3]  S. Kilbreath,et al.  Task-specific training of reaching and manipulation , 1994 .

[4]  P. Pigeon,et al.  Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Ryad Chellali,et al.  Depth Perception within Virtual Environments: A Comparative Study Between Wide Screen Stereoscopic Displays and Head Mounted Devices , 2009, 2009 Computation World: Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns.

[6]  Mihaela A. Zahariev,et al.  Grasping at ‘thin air’: multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  L. S. Tamkei,et al.  Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment: potential for virtual rehabilitation. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Virtual surfaces and the influence of cues to surface shape on grasp , 1998, Virtual Reality.

[9]  Mark F. Bradshaw,et al.  Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Shahina Pardhan,et al.  Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Depth Perception in Virtual Reality: Distance Estimations in Peri- and Extrapersonal Space , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Goodale,et al.  Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  Sigal Berman,et al.  Arm-plane representation of shoulder compensation during pointing movements in patients with stroke. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Physical Therapists' Guideline Adherence on Early Mobilization and Intensity of Practice at Dutch Acute Stroke Units: A Country-Wide Survey , 2012, Stroke.

[16]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Use of an interactive video gaming program compared with conventional physiotherapy for hospitalised older adults: a feasibility trial , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[17]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Vicky Chan,et al.  A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Ontological issues in distance perception: Cue use under full cue conditions cannot be inferred from use under controlled conditions , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Eliane C Magdalon,et al.  Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Danielle Levac,et al.  Documenting the Content of Physical Therapy for Children With Acquired Brain Injury: Development and Validation of the Motor Learning Strategy Rating Instrument , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[23]  P. L. Weiss,et al.  Kinematics of Reaching Movements in a 2-D Virtual Environment in Adults With and Without Stroke , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Günther Deuschl,et al.  Hand coordination following capsular stroke. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  M. Levin,et al.  Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: the reaching performance scale. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[26]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Is More Better? Using Metadata to Explore Dose–Response Relationships in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2014, Stroke.

[27]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[29]  T. Schenk,et al.  The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  J. Bell-Krotoski,et al.  The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. , 1987, The Journal of hand surgery.

[31]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[32]  Norman H. Hamm,et al.  Normative Data for the Purdue Pegboard on a Sample of Adult Candidates for Vocational Rehabilitation , 1980 .

[33]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[34]  Antonio Frisoli,et al.  The Combined Impact of Virtual Reality Neurorehabilitation and Its Interfaces on Upper Extremity Functional Recovery in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[35]  Qinyin Qiu,et al.  Learning in a Virtual Environment Using Haptic Systems for Movement Re-Education: Can This Medium Be Used for Remodeling other Behaviors and Actions? , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[36]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Virtual reality environments for post-stroke arm rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[37]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Consistent haptic feedback is required but it is not enough for natural reaching to virtual cylinders. , 2008, Human movement science.

[39]  A. Castellanos,et al.  Force Feedback Plays a Significant Role in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Results and Analysis , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[40]  Heidi Sveistrup,et al.  Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Arm Motor Recovery Using a Virtual Reality Intervention in Chronic Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[42]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[43]  D. G. Lawrence,et al.  The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways. , 1968, Brain : a journal of neurology.