Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for the recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following treatment for a first unprovoked VTE

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a chronic disease, with fatal recurrences occurring in 5% to 9% of patients, yet it is also one of the best examples of preventable disease. Prognostic models that utilise multiple prognostic factors (demographic, clinical and laboratory patient characteristics) in combination to predict individual outcome risk may allow the identification of patients who would benefit from long-term anticoagulation therapy, and conversely those that would benefit from stopping such therapy due to a low risk of recurrence. The study will systematically review the evidence on potential prognostic models for the recurrence of VTE or adverse outcomes following the cessation of therapy, and synthesise and summarise each model’s prognostic value. The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42013003494).Methods/designArticles will be sought from the Cochrane library (CENTRAL, CDSR, DARE, HTA databases), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Trial registers will be searched for ongoing studies, and conference abstracts will be sought. Reference lists and subject experts will be utilised. No restrictions on language of publications will be applied. Studies of any design will be included if they examine, in patients ceasing therapy after at least three months’ treatment with an oral anticoagulant therapy, whether more than one factor in combination is associated with the risk of VTE recurrence or another adverse outcome. Study quality will be assessed using appropriate guidelines for prognostic models. Prognostic models will be summarised qualitatively and, if tested in multiple validation studies, their predictive performance will be summarised using a random-effects meta-analysis model to account for any between-study heterogeneity.DiscussionThe results of the review will identify prognostic models for the risk of VTE recurrence or adverse outcome following cessation of therapy for a first unprovoked VTE. These will be informative for clinicians currently treating patients for a first unprovoked VTE and considering whether to stop treatment or not for particular individuals. The conclusions of the review will also inform the potential development of new prognostic models and clinical prediction rules to identify those at high or low risk of VTE recurrence or adverse outcome following a first unprovoked VTE.

[1]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[2]  S. Daeschner Pulmonary embolism. , 1988, Nursing.

[3]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Yvonne Vergouwe,et al.  Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Golder,et al.  Good Practice Guidelines for Decision-Analytic Modelling in Health Technology Assessment , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[7]  S. Kahn,et al.  Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[8]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Prognostic Models: A Methodological Framework and Review of Models for Breast Cancer , 2009, Cancer investigation.

[9]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  R. Hull,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. , 1986, Chest.

[11]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Mary Cushman,et al.  Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  G. Raskob,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). , 2008, Chest.

[14]  Georg Heinze,et al.  Risk Assessment of Recurrence in Patients With Unprovoked Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism: The Vienna Prediction Model , 2010, Circulation.

[15]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research , 2013, PLoS medicine.