Spelling provides a precise (but sometimes misplaced) phonological target. Orthography and acoustic variability in second language word learning

L1 French participants learned novel L2 English words over two days of learning sessions, with half of the words presented with their orthographic forms (Audio-Ortho) and half without (Audio only). One group heard the words pronounced by a single talker, while another group heard them pronounced by multiple talkers. On the third day, they completed a variety of tasks to evaluate their learning. Our results show a robust influence of orthography, with faster response times in both production (picture naming) and recognition (picture mapping) tasks for words learned in the Audio-Ortho condition. Moreover, formant analyses of the picture naming responses show that orthographic input pulls pronunciations of English novel words towards a non-native (French) phonological target. Words learned with their orthographic forms were pronounced more precisely (with smaller Dispersion Scores), but were misplaced in the vowel space (as reflected by smaller Euclidian distances with respect to French vowels). Finally, we found only limited evidence of an effect of talker-based acoustic variability: novel words learned with multiple talkers showed faster responses times in the picture naming task, but only in the Audio-only condition, which suggests that

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Modeling the relation between the production and recognition of spoken word forms , 2003 .

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Karen E. Mulak,et al.  Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn't always help* , 2013, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[5]  Makiko Sadakata,et al.  High stimulus variability in nonnative speech learning supports formation of abstract categories: evidence from Japanese geminates. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Chris Pratt,et al.  Evidence for an automatic orthographic code in the processing of visually novel word forms , 2004 .

[7]  C. Pattamadilok,et al.  The contribution of visual articulatory gestures and orthography to speech processing: Evidence from novel word learning. , 2021, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French , 1996 .

[9]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  A Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning , 2005 .

[10]  Lionel Mathieu The influence of foreign scripts on the acquisition of a second language phonological contrast , 2016 .

[11]  William Paterson,et al.  Spellings of Words : A Neglected Facilitator of Vocabulary Learning , 2022 .

[12]  Bruce L. Smith,et al.  Orthographic Input and the Acquisition of German Final Devoicing by Native Speakers of English , 2018, Language and speech.

[13]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[14]  Haley A. Vlach,et al.  Cross-Situational Learning of Minimal Word Pairs , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  A. Bürki,et al.  Orthography and second language word learning: Moving beyond "friend or foe?" , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[18]  Douglas H. Whalen,et al.  Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[19]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[20]  C. G. Henton,et al.  Towards an auditory theory of speaker normalization , 1984 .

[21]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input , 2015, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[22]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Perceptual Assimilation and Discrimination of Non-Native Vowel Contrasts , 2014, Phonetica.

[23]  J. Berns Merging low vowels in metropolitan French , 2015, Journal of French Language Studies.

[24]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels , 1962 .

[25]  B. Bassetti Orthography Affects Second Language Speech: Double Letters and Geminate Production in English , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Crosslanguage Study of Vowel Perception , 1969, Language and speech.

[27]  Kiwako Ito,et al.  Early L2 Spoken Word Recognition Combines Input-Based and Knowledge-Based Processing , 2018, Language and speech.

[28]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Building phonetic categories: an argument for the role of sleep , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[29]  S. Goldinger,et al.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[31]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[32]  P. Trofimovich What Do Second Language Listeners Know About Spoken Words? Effects of Experience and Attention in Spoken Word Processing , 2008, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  Edward Carney,et al.  A Survey of English Spelling , 1993 .

[34]  Chisato Kojima,et al.  Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners , 2014 .

[35]  Cyril Perret,et al.  Written training tasks are better than oral training tasks at improving L2 learners’ speech production , 2019, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[36]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words , 2003, Cognition.

[37]  D. Pisoni Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Meghan Clayards,et al.  Stimulus variability and perceptual learning of nonnative vowel categories , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[39]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Talker and Acoustic Variability in Learning to Produce Nonnative Sounds: Evidence from Articulatory Training , 2018, Language Learning.

[40]  Jason A. Shaw,et al.  Resilience of English vowel perception across regional accent variation , 2018, Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology.

[41]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: the L2LP model revised , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[42]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Eva Reinisch,et al.  Lexical representations can rapidly be updated in the early stages of second-language word learning , 2021, J. Phonetics.

[44]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Auditory-orthographic integration at the onset of L2 speech acquisition , 2018, Language and speech.

[45]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[46]  B van Ooijen,et al.  Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task. , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[47]  F. Craik,et al.  The Effect of Speaker's Voice on Word Recognition , 1974 .

[48]  Shannon L. Barrios,et al.  The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition , 2021, Language Teaching.

[49]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[50]  J. Harrington,et al.  An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels* , 1997 .

[51]  Lexical and Phonetic Influences on the Phonolexical Encoding of Difficult Second-Language Contrasts: Insights From Nonword Rejection , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[52]  Kira Gor,et al.  Fuzzy Nonnative Phonolexical Representations Lead to Fuzzy Form-to-Meaning Mappings , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[53]  A. Angwin,et al.  Investigating orthographic versus auditory cross-situational word learning with online and lab-based research , 2021 .

[54]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[55]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  Florian Schiel,et al.  Multilingual processing of speech via web services , 2017, Comput. Speech Lang..

[58]  Haley A. Vlach,et al.  Cross-Situational Learning of Phonologically Overlapping Words Across Degrees of Ambiguity , 2019, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  B. Bassetti,et al.  Effects of L1 orthography and L1 phonology on L2 English pronunciation , 2018 .

[60]  Mitchell S. Sommers,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC VARIABILITY ON SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[61]  G. Khattab,et al.  On the role of orthography in L2 vowel production: The case of Polish learners of German , 2020, Second Language Research.

[62]  J. Berns Low vowel variation in three French-speaking countries , 2018, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[63]  P. Wong,et al.  Poor phonetic perceivers are affected by cognitive load when resolving talker variability. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  J. Flege Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[65]  Kazuya Saito,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF TALKER VARIABILITY AND FREQUENCY OF EXPOSURE ON THE ACQUISITION OF SPOKEN WORD KNOWLEDGE , 2021, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[66]  E. Simon,et al.  Understanding the Role of Orthography in the Acquisition of a Non-Native Vowel Contrast. , 2010 .

[67]  Orthography-induced transfer in the production of English-speaking learners of Spanish , 2016 .

[68]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora , 2010 .

[69]  C. Best,et al.  VOCABULARY SIZE IS ASSOCIATED WITH SECOND-LANGUAGE VOWEL PERCEPTION PERFORMANCE IN ADULT LEARNERS , 2011, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[70]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .