Performance of mycology and histopathology tests for the diagnosis of toenail onychomycosis due to filamentous fungi: Dermatophyte and non‐dermatophyte moulds

Improvement of laboratory diagnosis of onychomychosis is important so that adequate treatment can be safely implemented. To evaluate and compare the performance of mycological and histopathological examinations in onychomycoses caused by dermatophyte and non‐dermatophyte moulds. Patients with lateral/distal subungual onychomycosis in at least one hallux were enrolled in the protocol and assessed via mycological and histopathological tests. The isolation of filamentous fungi was considered the gold standard. Test performance was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. A total of 212 patients were enrolled in the study. Direct microscopy (DM) was positive in 57.5% patients, and cultures in 34.4%. Among these patients, 23.3% were positive for dermatophytes, with Trichophyton rubrum the most frequently isolated, and 86.3% were positive for non‐dermatophytes, with Neoscytalidium dimidiatum predominance. Histopathology was positive in 41.0% samples. Direct microscopy showed better sensitivity for non‐dermatophyte moulds (P=.000) and nail clipping was more specific for dermatophyte (P=.018). Histopathology of the distal nail plate is a valuable complementary tool for the diagnosis of onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes and direct microscopy is especially useful for non‐dermatophyte molds.

[1]  S. Ranque,et al.  Performance of MALDI‐TOF MS platforms for fungal identification , 2016, Mycoses.

[2]  S. Noriki,et al.  Production of an anti-dermatophyte monoclonal antibody and its application: immunochromatographic detection of dermatophytes , 2016, Medical mycology.

[3]  R. Summerbell,et al.  The prevalence of unsuspected onychomycosis and its causative organisms in a multicentre Canadian sample of 30 000 patients visiting physicians' offices , 2016, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[4]  B. Werner,et al.  Microscopic Nail Clipping Findings in Patients With Psoriasis , 2015, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[5]  D. Yadav,et al.  The nondermatophyte molds: Emerging as leading cause of onychomycosis in south-east Rajasthan , 2015, Indian dermatology online journal.

[6]  C. A. Morales-Cardona,et al.  Non‐dermatophyte mould onychomycosis: a clinical and epidemiological study at a dermatology referral centre in Bogota, Colombia , 2014, Mycoses.

[7]  E. Sattler,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a new valuable tool in the diagnosis of onychomycosis – comparison of six diagnostic methods , 2013, Mycoses.

[8]  A. Shemer Update: medical treatment of onychomycosis , 2012, Dermatologic therapy.

[9]  Í. B. Cursi,et al.  Onychomycosis Due to Neoscytalidium Treated with Oral Terbinafine, Ciclopirox Nail Lacquer and Nail Abrasion: A Pilot Study of 25 Patients , 2012, Mycopathologia.

[10]  J. Misdraji,et al.  An improved method of surgical pathology testing for onychomycosis. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  J. Nazar,et al.  [Onychomycoses: epidemiology, causative agents and assessment of diagnostic laboratory methods]. , 2012, Revista Argentina de microbiologia.

[12]  R. Hay,et al.  Onychomycosis: a proposed revision of the clinical classification. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  Ígor Brum Cursi,et al.  Onicomicose por Scytalidium spp.: estudo clínico-epidemiológico em um hospital universitário do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil , 2011 .

[14]  T. Bieber,et al.  New reasons for histopathological nail‐clipping examination in the diagnosis of onychomycosis , 2011, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[15]  Í. B. Cursi,et al.  Onycomychosis due to Scytalidium spp.: a clinical and epidemiologic study at a University Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. , 2011, Anais brasileiros de dermatologia.

[16]  R. Brilhante,et al.  Successive mycological nail tests for onychomycosis: a strategy to improve diagnosis efficiency. , 2008, The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.

[17]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for toenail onychomycosis: a repeated-measure, single-blinded, cross-sectional evaluation of 7 diagnostic tests. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[18]  Aditya K. Gupta,et al.  Diagnosing onychomycosis. , 2006, Dermatologic clinics.

[19]  M Feuilhade de Chauvin,et al.  New diagnostic techniques , 2006, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[20]  R. Summerbell,et al.  Onychomycosis: classification and diagnosis. , 2004, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[21]  M. Landthaler,et al.  Histopathological diagnosis of onychomycosis by periodic acid–Schiff‐stained nail clippings , 2003, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  C. Gianni,et al.  Usefulness of Histological Examination for the Diagnosis of Onychomycosis , 2001, Dermatology.