Developing Zonal Crash Prediction Models with a Focus on Application of Different Exposure Measures

1 Assessing the safety impacts of Travel Demand Management (TDM) policies is essential to be 2 carried out by means of a proactive approach. Since TDM policies are typically implemented at 3 an aggregate level, Crash Prediction Models (CPMs) should also be developed at a similar level 4 of aggregation. These models should match better with the resolution at which TDM evaluations 5 are performed. Therefore Zonal Crash Prediction Models (ZCPMs) are considered to construct 6 the association between observed crashes and a set of predictor variables in each zone. This is 7 carried out by the Generalized Linear Modeling (GLM) procedure with the assumption of 8 Negative Binomial (NB) error distribution. Different exposure, network and socio-demographic 9 variables of 2200 Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) are considered as predictors of crashes in the 10 study area, Flanders, Belgium. To this end, an activity-based transportation model framework is 11 applied to produce exposure measurements. Crash data used in this study consist of recorded 12 injury crashes between 2004 and 2007. The network and socio-demographic variables are also 13 collected from other sources. In this study, different ZCPMs are developed to predict the Number 14 of Injury Crashes (NOICs); including fatal, severely and slightly injury crashes. These models 15 are classified into three different groups, i.e. 1) flow-based models, 2) trip-based models and 3) a 16 combination of the two. The results show a considerable improvement of the model performance 17 when both trip-based and flow-based exposure variables are used simultaneously in the model’s 18 formulation. The main purpose of this study is to provide a predictive tool at the planning-level 19 which can be applied on different TDM policies to evaluate their traffic safety impacts. 20 TRB 2012 Annual Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. Pirdavani, Brijs, Bellemans, Kochan and Wets 3

[1]  M. Quddus Modelling area-wide count outcomes with spatial correlation and heterogeneity: an analysis of London crash data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  J L Martin,et al.  Comparison of road crashes incidence and severity between some French counties. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Ali Naderan,et al.  Aggregate crash prediction models: introducing crash generation concept. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Todd Alexander Litman,et al.  Macrolevel Collision Prediction Models to Evaluate Road Safety Effects of Mobility Management Strategies: New Empirical Tools to Promote Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[5]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[6]  M G Karlaftis,et al.  Heterogeneity considerations in accident modeling. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Development of Planning-Level Transportation Safety Models using Full Bayesian Semiparametric Additive Techniques , 2010 .

[8]  Meiwu An,et al.  Using Travel Demand Model and Zonal Safety Planning Model for Safety Benefit Estimation in Project Evaluation , 2011 .

[9]  A. Shalaby,et al.  Macrolevel Accident Prediction Models for Evaluating Safety of Urban Transportation Systems , 2003 .

[10]  Robert B Noland,et al.  The effect of infrastructure and demographic change on traffic-related fatalities and crashes: a case study of Illinois county-level data. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Safety Prediction Models , 2007 .

[12]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Modelling Short-Term Dynamics in Activity-Travel Patterns: Conceptual Framework of the Feathers Model , 2007 .

[13]  A. Shalaby,et al.  Development of planning level transportation safety tools using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Macrolevel Collision Prediction Models to Enhance Traditional Reactive Road Safety Improvement Programs , 2007 .

[15]  Rajiv Bhatia,et al.  An area-level model of vehicle-pedestrian injury collisions with implications for land use and transportation planning. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Alireza Hadayeghi,et al.  Temporal transferability and updating of zonal level accident prediction models. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Macro-level collision prediction models for evaluating neighbourhood traffic safety , 2006 .

[18]  P. Jovanis,et al.  Spatial analysis of fatal and injury crashes in Pennsylvania. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Fuel Cost on Traffic Demand in Flanders using Activity-Based Models , 2008 .

[20]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Zonal-Level Safety Evaluation Incorporating Trip Generation Effects , 2011 .

[21]  Jutaek Oh,et al.  Forecasting Crashes at the Planning Level: Simultaneous Negative Binomial Crash Model Applied in Tucson, Arizona , 2004 .

[22]  N. Levine,et al.  Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: II. Zonal generators. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  M. Quddus,et al.  A spatially disaggregate analysis of road casualties in England. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Helai Huang,et al.  County-Level Crash Risk Analysis in Florida: Bayesian Spatial Modeling , 2010 .