Ultrasound Velocity of Trabecular Cubes Reflects Mainly Bone Density and Elasticity

Abstract. Studies have indicated that quantitative ultrasound (QUS) variables may be influenced by the mechanical properties of bone which in turn are determined by bone's material and structural properties. However, from these studies it is unclear what role density, elasticity, and structure play in determining velocity. Eighteen defatted, 12-mm cubic trabecular bone specimens were cut from cadaveric specimens. Amplitude-dependent speed of sound (SOS) using a single point QUS system was assessed in three orthogonal axes. Magnetic resonance images were obtained, from which measures of apparent trabeuclar structure were derived. The specimens were nondestructively tested in compression along three orthogonal axes defined by the sides of the cubes. The elastic modulus (in the three directions) and the strength (in one direction) were determined. Trabecular BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography. SOS varied significantly with direction of measurement, with the highest value in the axial direction (axial:1715 m/s, sagittal: 1662 m/second, and coronal: 1676 m/s). SOS of each of the three axes was generally associated with the various mechanical (r = 0.30–0.87), density (r = 0.81–0.93), and bone structural variables (0.3–0.8). However, after adjusting the SOS correlations by density, only the correlation with elasticity remained significant in the coronal direction. BMD alone explained 88–93% of variance in SOS whereas in the multivariate model, BMD plus elasticity and/or anisotropic variables explained 96–98% of the variance in SOS. Variability of SOS is explained mostly by density and to a small extent by elasticity or anisotropy. Since only 2–6% of the variance of the QUS measurement is not explained by density and elasticity, one could conclude that the remaining variance reflects other properties of bone or perhaps simply measurement error. Evidence that these other properties may be structure related is only found in the anisotropy of QUS parameter.

[1]  C. M. Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[2]  D. Hans,et al.  Age-related changes in os calcis ultrasonic indices: A 2-year prospective study , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  T A Einhorn,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of bone. , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  E. Orwoll,et al.  Precision and Discriminatory Ability of Calcaneal Bone Assessment Technologies , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures , 1985, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  T. Ishida,et al.  Trabecular Pattern Analysis Using Fractal Dimension , 1993 .

[7]  R. Cadossi,et al.  Pathways of transmission of ultrasound energy through the distal metaphysis of the second phalanx of pigs: An in vitro study , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. , 1987, Bone.

[9]  J. Davis,et al.  Ultrasound velocity and broadband attenuation as predictors of load-bearing capacities of human calcanei , 2009, Calcified Tissue International.

[10]  A M Schott,et al.  Ultrasonic assessment of bone: a review. , 1993, The European journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Application of fractal geometry techniques to the study of trabecular bone. , 1993, Medical physics.

[12]  F. Linde,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone by a non-destructive compression testing approach. , 1988, Engineering in medicine.

[13]  S. Bentzen,et al.  The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density. , 1989, Bone.

[14]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[15]  A M Schott,et al.  Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass?: a two-dimensional histomorphometric study. , 1995, Bone.

[16]  C. M. Langton,et al.  Prediction of Human Femoral Bone Strength Using Ultrasound Velocity and BMD: An In Vitro Study , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[17]  A. Kriska,et al.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: A review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  G Van der Perre,et al.  A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Bone.

[21]  C. Glüer,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current Status , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  T. Fuerst,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound bone measurement , 1997, European Radiology.

[23]  S Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoporosis. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[24]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: An in vitro study , 1993, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Analysis of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius using high-resolution MRI , 1994, European Radiology.

[26]  C. Simmons,et al.  Trabecular bone morphology from micro‐magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  C F Njeh,et al.  Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  J. A. Evans,et al.  Low-frequency ultrasonic velocity measurements in human calcaneal trabecular bone. , 1997, Physiological measurement.

[29]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Ultrasound Characterization of Bone Demineralization , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  Thomas A. Einhorn,et al.  Perspectives: Ultrasound assessment of bone , 1993 .

[32]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[33]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  C. Turner,et al.  Ultrasonic velocity as a predictor of strength in bovine cancellous bone , 1991, Calcified Tissue International.

[35]  S. Majumdar,et al.  A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis , 1995, Osteoporosis International.

[36]  J. A. Evans,et al.  Dependence of the velocity and attenuation of ultrasound in bone on the mineral content. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  C F Njeh,et al.  The ability of ultrasound velocity to predict the stiffness of cancellous bone in vitro. , 1997, Bone.

[39]  P. Nicholson,et al.  The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  R. Lew,et al.  The relationship between ultrasound and densitometric measurements of bone mass at the calcaneus in women , 1992, Calcified Tissue International.

[41]  James A. Zagzebski,et al.  Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis , 1991, Calcified Tissue International.